Team:KAIT Japan/Human Practice

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 86: Line 86:
::::65 people answered these questions. Here is the results we obtained.
::::65 people answered these questions. Here is the results we obtained.
:::https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/3/35/KAIT_Japan-Human-Practice-graphQ1.png https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/4/47/KAIT_Japan-Human-Practice-graphQ2.png
:::https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/3/35/KAIT_Japan-Human-Practice-graphQ1.png https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/4/47/KAIT_Japan-Human-Practice-graphQ2.png
 +
:::https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/4/4c/KAIT_Japan-Human-Practice-graphQ3-1.png https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/7/7c/KAIT_Japan-Human-Practice-graphQ3-2.png
 +
:::https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/0/00/KAIT_Japan-Human-Practice-graphQ4-1.png https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/5/58/KAIT_Japan-Human-Practice-graphQ4-2.png
|}
|}

Revision as of 04:41, 25 September 2012

KAIT Japan2012 logo.png
KAIT Japan2012 Sub.png
Kaitjapan iGEM official.logo.png


Kaitjapan.home.png

Home

Kaitjapan project.png

Project

Kaitjapan parts.png

Parts

Kaitjapan protocol.png

Protocol

Kaitjapan notebook.png

Notebook

Kaitjapan results.png

Results

Kaitjapan safety.png

Safety

Kaitjapan human practice.png

Human Practice

Kaitjapan team.png

Team

Human Practice

Safety Icon Project

Project Page
partsregistry Page

Main

1.Overview
We did questionary survey about the gene recombination to a university student. As a result of questionnaire, we could know that there were many people who had a bad image for gene recombination.
“How do you think of gene recombination?”
　Answer result
  • It is adverse effects to a body.
  • It might change ecosystem.
  • It is untrustworthy.
  • It is difficult.
We thought that we wanted many people to know the good point of genetic modification and the synthetic creature.
2.Posters
　We want to convey that experiment of a gene recombination is not a dangerous thing. We made the poster of the question and answer form to make general people understand it.
　At first we felt that understanding about the reason why experiment of a gene recombination is dangerous for general people didn't have enough information. Therefore we commented on the risk of the gene recombination experiment from a point of view of the diffusion the recombination creature to the environment. And we gave the following examples and explained that there was an international decision for nonproliferation of the gene recombination creature to the environment.
  • 　There are P1, P2, P3 level in the laboratory where we experiment of gene recombination.
  • 　There is Cartagena Protocol about the handling of the gene recombination creature.　
　Our university has the laboratory of P1 and P2 level. We explained to a general person that we abide for nonproliferation of the genetically-modified creature to the environment.
　And we made the poster about the activity contents of the iGEM.
Poster
3.Questionnaire
Our survey consisted of the following questions:
  • Q1. Did you know the words “gene recombination ”?
  • Q2.Did you know the words “synthetic biology”?
  • Q3.How do you think of composing a creature by gene recombination ?
  • Q4.Do you think about genetic modification, is it terrible?
  • Q5.Please write an opinion about a thing and the genetic modification that you felt after having listened presentation.
KAIT_Japan-Human-Practice-graph1.png
65 people answered these questions. Here is the results we obtained.
KAIT_Japan-Human-Practice-graphQ1.png KAIT_Japan-Human-Practice-graphQ2.png
KAIT_Japan-Human-Practice-graphQ3-1.png KAIT_Japan-Human-Practice-graphQ3-2.png
KAIT_Japan-Human-Practice-graphQ4-1.png KAIT_Japan-Human-Practice-graphQ4-2.png
Retrieved from "http://2012.igem.org/Team:KAIT_Japan/Human_Practice"