"
Team:Potsdam Bioware/SocialBrick/Science Meets Politics
From 2012.igem.org
(→Science Meets Politics) |
|||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
Primarily, we promote science and also demand the financial support of projects. Nevertheless, we see also the risks and potentially danger of Synthetic Biology. In the worst case we would abstain from gaining knowledge about a topic if there is danger associated with it. | Primarily, we promote science and also demand the financial support of projects. Nevertheless, we see also the risks and potentially danger of Synthetic Biology. In the worst case we would abstain from gaining knowledge about a topic if there is danger associated with it. | ||
Nevertheless there is a great potential of Synthetic Biology for example to avoid animal experiments. However, we see the release of genetically modified organisms into the environment very critical. For example, we would not have supported the disposal of genetically modified bacteria to combat the Exxon Valdez catastrophe 1989. | Nevertheless there is a great potential of Synthetic Biology for example to avoid animal experiments. However, we see the release of genetically modified organisms into the environment very critical. For example, we would not have supported the disposal of genetically modified bacteria to combat the Exxon Valdez catastrophe 1989. | ||
| - | Two points are very important, because they are official positions of Pirate Party Germany. Firstly, we demand free access to information for society because we don´t see danger for the public safety. In our opinion, the withholding of information promotes illegal behavior. Therefore, we strictly refuse military research. That is the reason why we demand the support of public research. That is also a part of the second point: when we financially support companies the results have to be freely accessible for the public without any constraints. Finally we recommend a survey in any case of public interest. | + | Two points are very important, because they are official positions of Pirate Party Germany. Firstly, we demand free access to information for society because we don´t see danger for the public safety. In our opinion, the withholding of information promotes illegal behavior. Therefore, we strictly refuse military research. That is the reason why we demand the support of public research. That is also a part of the second point: when we financially support companies the results have to be freely accessible for the public without any constraints. Finally we recommend a survey in any case of public interest.<br> |
| + | <br> | ||
| + | '''Dr. Max Lehmer'''<br> | ||
| + | (CSU, Member of the German Bundestag)<br><br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''Details to Dr. Max Lehmer''<br> | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | Dr. Max Lehmer received a doctor’s degree for agricultural sciences | ||
| + | in 1981. Since 1970 he’s a member of the CSU party and since 2005 | ||
| + | member of the German Bundestag. He is also member of the | ||
| + | Committee on Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection.<br> | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | ''Statements on Synthetic Biology''<br> | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | Synthetic Biology is one of the most exciting science fields. There is a great potential | ||
| + | associated with Synthetic Biology which we can and should use. Specially, the green genetic | ||
| + | engineering provides us with many possibilities to respond to future challenges such as | ||
| + | climate change. That is the reason why we should financially support companies developing | ||
| + | Synthetic Biology and German teams participating in the iGEM competition. Of course, there | ||
| + | are some risks and uncertainties. Nevertheless, we should use the possibilities of Synthetic | ||
| + | Biology in form of genetically modified organisms to meet the world’s need for food, to cure | ||
| + | diseases or even to attenuate the consequences of ecological disasters.<br> | ||
| + | To increase public acceptance for Synthetic Biology, it is important that scientists, politicians | ||
| + | and other citizens work together, for example in a civic dialogue. In my opinion this process | ||
| + | is very important, because the refusal of genetically modified organisms in our daily life, for | ||
| + | example in our food, will not be sustainable in the light of the increasing market potential and | ||
| + | possibilities of Synthetic Biology in the future. Furthermore, I think that the German public | ||
| + | and politics overreact to the topic of Synthetic Biology or genetic engineering in general. | ||
| + | Although Synthetic Biology provides us with many useful tools to modify and change genetic | ||
| + | information, it can also be used to genetically generate dangerous biological material like | ||
| + | Dutch scientists did with the H5N1 virus in 2011. Nevertheless, information should not be | ||
| + | restrained. In contrast, we have to discuss the problems more transparently. | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 10:13, 24 September 2012
Science Meets Politics
In this year we interviewed 6 Members from the German parliament (Bundestag) affiliating to two different parties, CDU and SPD and members of the squad for economy and environment of the Pirate party. Furthermore, we meet the German Minister of Education, Mrs. Schavan. In the following section we summarized the short interviews.
The Pirate Party Germany
Details to the Pirate Party Germany
The Pirate Party Germany is an alternative party which combines different political directions. The party demands direct democracy, transparency and freedom of information. That is why they are critical with copyright and patent law. Currently the party is not member of the German Bundestag but represented in some Landtagen (parliament of German constitutive federal states). We got the chance to meet the Berlin Squad for economy and environment on 6th September 2012. The Members of the Squad tried to answer our questions about Synthetic Biology. It has to be mentioned, that the given answers are not the opinion of the whole Pirate Party, only of the Berlin Squad for economy and environment.
Statements on Synthetic Biology
Primarily, we promote science and also demand the financial support of projects. Nevertheless, we see also the risks and potentially danger of Synthetic Biology. In the worst case we would abstain from gaining knowledge about a topic if there is danger associated with it.
Nevertheless there is a great potential of Synthetic Biology for example to avoid animal experiments. However, we see the release of genetically modified organisms into the environment very critical. For example, we would not have supported the disposal of genetically modified bacteria to combat the Exxon Valdez catastrophe 1989.
Two points are very important, because they are official positions of Pirate Party Germany. Firstly, we demand free access to information for society because we don´t see danger for the public safety. In our opinion, the withholding of information promotes illegal behavior. Therefore, we strictly refuse military research. That is the reason why we demand the support of public research. That is also a part of the second point: when we financially support companies the results have to be freely accessible for the public without any constraints. Finally we recommend a survey in any case of public interest.
Dr. Max Lehmer
(CSU, Member of the German Bundestag)
Details to Dr. Max Lehmer
Dr. Max Lehmer received a doctor’s degree for agricultural sciences
in 1981. Since 1970 he’s a member of the CSU party and since 2005
member of the German Bundestag. He is also member of the
Committee on Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection.
Statements on Synthetic Biology
Synthetic Biology is one of the most exciting science fields. There is a great potential
associated with Synthetic Biology which we can and should use. Specially, the green genetic
engineering provides us with many possibilities to respond to future challenges such as
climate change. That is the reason why we should financially support companies developing
Synthetic Biology and German teams participating in the iGEM competition. Of course, there
are some risks and uncertainties. Nevertheless, we should use the possibilities of Synthetic
Biology in form of genetically modified organisms to meet the world’s need for food, to cure
diseases or even to attenuate the consequences of ecological disasters.
To increase public acceptance for Synthetic Biology, it is important that scientists, politicians
and other citizens work together, for example in a civic dialogue. In my opinion this process
is very important, because the refusal of genetically modified organisms in our daily life, for
example in our food, will not be sustainable in the light of the increasing market potential and
possibilities of Synthetic Biology in the future. Furthermore, I think that the German public
and politics overreact to the topic of Synthetic Biology or genetic engineering in general.
Although Synthetic Biology provides us with many useful tools to modify and change genetic
information, it can also be used to genetically generate dangerous biological material like
Dutch scientists did with the H5N1 virus in 2011. Nevertheless, information should not be
restrained. In contrast, we have to discuss the problems more transparently.
