Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Judging

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(→Judging criteria)
(→Judging criteria)
Line 88: Line 88:
</html>
</html>
-
==Judging criteria==
 
-
 
-
=== Bronze criteria===
 
-
 
-
* Registration of our team
 
-
* Judging form completed
 
-
* Team Wiki constructed
 
-
* Presentation of a poster and a talk at the iGEM Jamboree
 
-
* One new submitted and highly-documented standard BioBrick Part or Device. A new application of and outstanding documentation (quantitative data showing the Part’s/ Device’s function) of a previously existing BioBrick part in the “Experience” section of that BioBrick’s Registry entry also counts.
 
-
 
-
=== Silver criteria===
 
-
In addition to the Bronze criteria...
 
-
 
-
* Demonstrate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expected
 
-
* Characterize the operation of at least one new BioBrick Part or Device and enter this information in the “Main Page” section of that Part’s/Device’s Registry entry.
 
-
 
-
===Gold criteria===
 
-
One or more of the following aspects in addition to the Bronze & Silver criteria...
 
-
 
-
* Improve the function of an existing BioBrick Part or Device (created by another team or your own institution in a previous year) and enter this information in the Registry (in the “Experience” section of that BioBrick’s Registry entry), and don't forget to create a new registry page for the improved part.
 
-
    The growth of the Registry depends on having a broad base of reliable parts. This is why the improvement of an existing part is just as important as the creation and documentation of a new part. An "improvement" is anything that improves the functionality and ease-of-use of a part, so that it is more likely to be used by the community. For instance: strengthening the expression of a part by mutating the DNA sequence; modifying one or a few parts in construct (Device) so that it performs its intended job better; improving a cloning or expression vector that can be easily used by the entire community; and of course, troubleshooting and fixing a part reported to be non-functional. Data from an experimental comparison between the original and improved part/ device is strongly recommended.
 
-
* Help another iGEM team by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system.
 
-
* Outline and detail a new approach to an issue of Human Practice in synthetic biology as it relates to your project, such as safety, security, ethics, or ownership, sharing, and innovation.
 
-
 
==Collaboration with the TU Munich and the UCL London==
==Collaboration with the TU Munich and the UCL London==
{{Team:TU_Munich/Badge}}  
{{Team:TU_Munich/Badge}}  

Revision as of 08:30, 22 September 2012

BioBricks

coming soon. read more

coming soon read more

coming soon read more

Collaboration with the TU Munich and the UCL London

This team completed TU Munich's survey on Standardization of BioBrick part descriptions

coming soon read more

Bielefeld2012 Under construction.png



55px Logo merck.jpg BioCircle.JPG Bielefeld2012 Evonik.jpg Bielefeld2012 Baxter.png Logo knauer.jpg Logo iit.jpg Bielefeld2012 BIEKUBA.jpg Logo biometra.jpg Logo bio-nrw.png Bielefeld2012 Logo ERASynbio.jpg

About our Wiki

Fifteen students from different fields of study from the Bielefeld University aspired to complete a project called TOXIC COMPOUNDS IN NATURAL WATER - A CASE FOR LACCASE. In his Wiki we document our achievements and our approach.

Contact Us

Universität Bielefeld
Universitätsstraße 25
D-33615 Bielefeld

info(at)igem-bielefeld.de

Navigate our Wiki

Start

Team

Project

Results

Since Regionals

Human Practice

Safety

Judging

Partner

Retrieved from "http://2012.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-Germany/Judging"