Team:Cambridge/Outreach/FutureDirections
From 2012.igem.org
(Created page with "=Chanel number six= One of the big features of our project is the use of a second fluorescence/ luminescence channel to give a reliable estimate of cell activity, against which ...") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{Template:Team:Cambridge/CAM_2012_TEMPLATE_HEAD_OUTREACH}} | ||
+ | |||
=Chanel number six= | =Chanel number six= | ||
Line 27: | Line 29: | ||
===References=== | ===References=== | ||
*Gather M. and Yun S., Single-cell biological lasers, Nature Photonics (2011) '''5''', 406–410 | *Gather M. and Yun S., Single-cell biological lasers, Nature Photonics (2011) '''5''', 406–410 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {{Template:Team:Cambridge/CAM_2012_TEMPLATE_FOOT}} |
Revision as of 14:07, 20 September 2012
Contents |
Chanel number six
One of the big features of our project is the use of a second fluorescence/ luminescence channel to give a reliable estimate of cell activity, against which reporter activity can be adjusted. However, there is no need to limit ourselves to only two channels - the more channels that are used, the more data that can be squeezed out of a single biosensor strain.
Design considerations
An issue with this proposal is that with additional channels, there comes a greater risk of cross talk between the channels. This is part of the reason we have chosen to isolate our different biosensor strains in separate containers. In essence, each container is a different channel, separated in space rather than in wavelength. However, with the progression of our knowledge of the field of sythetic biology and the development of improved predictive software, we should be able to avoid this problem in the future.
More fundamental is the problem of reliably distinguishing the different channels. While a two channel system is relatively simple to use, use of three or more fluorescent proteins may cause ambiguities in the data, as shown in the figure. These problems are similar to those seen in vision, where the overlap in the spectral sensitivities of the three cone types leads to impairment of our ability to accurately distinguish different hues. In this case though, the main difficulty is with the growth of unreliability of the measurements with increasing numbers of overlapping emission curves.
To get around this, we propose using additional forms of channel. For example, one paper that has been published used the frequency of oscillation of a genetic circuit as an output. By using both amplitude and frequency of such an oscillatory system, it may be possible to encode two variables with a single fluorescent protein, effectively doubling the possible number of outputs. It is possible to concieve of other possible output channels - given that light is the most simple thing to detect in microbiological contexts (hence why fluorescent proteins and luminescent proteins are the most popular reporter choices for various assays on microscopic samples), it would be interesting to investigate the possibility of using other properties of the emitted light. Would it be possible to control the polorisation of the light, for example? Such a system would most likely need advances in cell fixation techniques, so as to ensure that the cells are aligned in the same direction.
Alternatively, the development of techniques that enable GFP (and, in the future, most likely other fluorescent proteins) to act as lasers may sharpen the emission spectra of these proteins. In doing so, the number of different fluorescent proteins that could be sqeezed into the available spectral range would be greatly increaced. Again, this would enable us to use even more channels.
Unfortuneately, such biological lasers have only been demonstrated in animal cells, and the cell walls of bacteria may interfere with the ability to generate effective lasing. Nevertheless, if a sensing standard within eukaryotic cells is ever developed, this may become a useful tool for increasing the range of such a system.
This approach is simelar to that used by the Mantis shrimp, which is capable
However, either of these techniques will require considerable leaps in our ability to create complex constructs. Gibson may be suitable, but from our experience it will need to be made more reliable before we use it to make the large constructions needed.
Potential applications
Should the prospect of reliable construction of plasmids with three or more channels become a reality, the oppertunities will be vast. One of the most simple (yet effective) may be the development of improved control systems for bioreactors. A three channel system should be all that is needed for the accurate and speedy detection of changes in the metabolism of cultured cells within the bioreactor. As discussed in this paper(LINK), magnesium often becomes a limiting nutrient within bacterial cultures, causing a distinct shift in the metabolic properties of the cells. One channel would therefore be devoted to the measurement of magnesium in the culture with the magnesium riboswitch (linK) we have characterized, causing automatic release of magnesium chloride by the control system into the medium. A second channel would monitor the levels of sigma factors usually only present during the plateau phase of growth, causing the release of fresh media if it detects that growth is about to slow down, and so preventing changes in the metabolic properties of the cells. The third channel would
With increacing complexity of our ability to use multiple channels comes increacing complexity of the applications.
References
- Gather M. and Yun S., Single-cell biological lasers, Nature Photonics (2011) 5, 406–410