Team:TU Munich/Modeling/Priors

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Yeast mRNA Degradation Rate)
(Yeast Transcription Rate Rate)
Line 72: Line 72:
As these values do not give enough information to infer a proper distribution, only the two lower bounds 5 h and 30 h will serve as approximate lower bounds for the optimization routines.
As these values do not give enough information to infer a proper distribution, only the two lower bounds 5 h and 30 h will serve as approximate lower bounds for the optimization routines.
-
== Yeast Transcription Rate Rate ==
+
== Yeast Transcription Rate ==
<hr/>
<hr/>
[[File:TUM12_mRNA_transcription.png|300px|thumb|right|Picture taken from Pelechano et al. 2010]]
[[File:TUM12_mRNA_transcription.png|300px|thumb|right|Picture taken from Pelechano et al. 2010]]

Revision as of 17:47, 17 September 2012


Contents

Prior Data


Yeast mRNA Degradation Rate


Picture taken from Wang et. al. 2001
TUM12 PriormRNAdecay.jpg

Data was obtained from the Paper (Wang et al. 2001 [http://www.pnas.org/content/99/9/5860.long]) and processed by [http://arohatgi.info/WebPlotDigitizer/app/] to obtain raw data. Using a least-squared error approximation the distribution of the half life time in was approximated as noncentral t-distribution with parameters μ = 1.769 and ν = 20.59.

dataGraph = [
0.0018691649126431735,0.0016851538590669062
0.05978099456360327,0.01885629059542104
0.11548146330755026,0.21910551258377348
0.17122389948476902,0.396902157771723
0.2253457470848775,0.4417136917136917
0.2815821076690642,0.3552607791738227
0.3359848142456839,0.249812760682326
0.39216629434020744,0.19272091011221448
0.4465173486912618,0.11490683229813668
0.5026600896166115,0.07854043723608946
0.5569239808370243,0.04735863431515607
0.6111394480959699,0.04208365077930302
0.667233765059852,0.031624075102336016
0.7233280820237343,0.021164499425369035
0.777540321018582,0.017616637181854626
0.8373665112795547,0.010604847561369285
0.8897063570976615,0.008787334874291503
0.9420462029157682,0.006969822187213598
0.9999935434718044,0.005142624707842157
];
%scale the data
X = round(dataGraph(:,1)*90);
y = round(dataGraph(:,2)*2000);

k(1) = 1.769292045467269;
k(2) = 20.589996419308118;
k(3) = 24852.48237036381;

k=fminunc(@(z) sum((y-z(3)*nctpdf(X,z(1),z(2))).^2),k);
k=fminunc(@(z) sum((y-z(3)*nctpdf(X,z(1),z(2))).^2),k);
k=fminunc(@(z) sum((y-z(3)*nctpdf(X,z(1),z(2))).^2),k);
k=fminunc(@(z) sum((y-z(3)*nctpdf(X,z(1),z(2))).^2),k);
k=fminunc(@(z) sum((y-z(3)*nctpdf(X,z(1),z(2))).^2),k);

The matlab nctpdf.m script needs to compute the limit of an infinite series to calculate the probabilities for the noncentral t-distribution. As this the function will be called several million times during the generation of samples, the computation was quite time consuming and the funtion was approximated using chebyshev interpolation [http://www2.maths.ox.ac.uk/chebfun/].

Yeast Protein Degradation Rate


For the Degradation Rate the N-end rule (Varshavsky 1997 [http://openwetware.org/images/c/c2/The_N-end_Rule_Pathway_of_Protein_Degradation.pdf]) served as approximation for the half life time. It states that the half life time in S. cerevisiae can be approximated based on the amino acid after the initial start codon.

Residue ! Half-life
Arg 2 min
Lys, Phe, Leu, Trp, His, Asp, Asn 3 min
Tyr, Gln 10 min
Ile, Glu 30 min
Pro > 5 h
Cys, Ala, Ser, Thr, Gly, Val, Met > 30 h

As these values do not give enough information to infer a proper distribution, only the two lower bounds 5 h and 30 h will serve as approximate lower bounds for the optimization routines.

Yeast Transcription Rate


Picture taken from Pelechano et al. 2010
TUM12 PriormRNAtrans.jpg

Data was obtained from the Paper (Pelechano et al. 2010 [http://www.pnas.org/content/99/9/5860.long]) and processed by [http://arohatgi.info/WebPlotDigitizer/app/] to obtain raw data. Using a least-squared error approximation the distribution of the transcription rate was approximated as log-normal distribution with parameters μ = -1.492 and σ = 0.661;.

dataGraph = [
-1.8,0.3442950751957339
-1.6,1.3525375039897853
-1.4,3.5492668181220783
-1.2,11.28874786429094
-1.0,23.213749272450762
-0.8,26.31522126884587
-0.6,18.273455248681024
-0.4,7.913623476840467
-0.2,3.7755111620134825
0,1.9559339854677913
0.2,0.6458759692833385
0.4,0.12767315671880167
];

x = 10.^dataGraph(:,1);
y = dataGraph(:,2);

k(1) = -0.8;
k(2) = 0.2;
k(3) = 25;

k=fminunc(@(z) sum((y-z(3)*lognpdf(x,z(1),z(2))).^2),k);
k=fminunc(@(z) sum((y-z(3)*lognpdf(x,z(1),z(2))).^2),k);
k=fminunc(@(z) sum((y-z(3)*lognpdf(x,z(1),z(2))).^2),k);
k=fminunc(@(z) sum((y-z(3)*lognpdf(x,z(1),z(2))).^2),k);


Reference

  • []
  • []
  • []