Team:Amsterdam/project/description

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(3 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
{{Team:Amsterdam/Header}}
{{Team:Amsterdam/Header}}
{{Team:Amsterdam/Sidebar1}}
{{Team:Amsterdam/Sidebar1}}
-
<div id="main-content">
+
 
 +
<div id="content-area">
 +
<div id="sub-menu" class="content-block">
 +
 
<h1>Project Description</h1>
<h1>Project Description</h1>
 +
<center>__TOC__</center>
 +
 +
</div>
 +
<div id="sub-menu" class="content-block">
 +
<h2>Introduction</h2>
<h2>Introduction</h2>
Prokaryotes have been selected through evolutionary processes for accurate sensing and acting upon their living environments. This bacterial versatility can be used by us, humans, to sense the environments in places we have trouble reaching. Maybe we would want to measure the conditions (e.g. nutrient availability, toxicity, pathogen presence, light) somewhere deep under the ground, perhaps we would want to noninvasively scan for biomarkers in diseased tissue in our bodies. The classical way to make a bacteria tell us whether a certain event has happened is to link it to the transcription of fluorescent proteins. This however requires constant monitoring and maintenance in order to get an idea of the time-variation of the studied system. Could we make the cell ‘remember’ what it has sensed and when so we can leave it alone for a while and make it report back to us later?<br\>
Prokaryotes have been selected through evolutionary processes for accurate sensing and acting upon their living environments. This bacterial versatility can be used by us, humans, to sense the environments in places we have trouble reaching. Maybe we would want to measure the conditions (e.g. nutrient availability, toxicity, pathogen presence, light) somewhere deep under the ground, perhaps we would want to noninvasively scan for biomarkers in diseased tissue in our bodies. The classical way to make a bacteria tell us whether a certain event has happened is to link it to the transcription of fluorescent proteins. This however requires constant monitoring and maintenance in order to get an idea of the time-variation of the studied system. Could we make the cell ‘remember’ what it has sensed and when so we can leave it alone for a while and make it report back to us later?<br\>
Line 11: Line 19:
Just storing whether certain signals have been sensed by the cell is only half of the story however. The proposed memory mechanism would be a form of volatile memory, of which the traces slowly dissappear as the E. memo-population keeps proliferating. This is because methylation-patterns are not transferred to the progeny in eukaryotes. We can use this our advantage. The most exciting part of our project would be to infer when a signal has been sensed from the percentage of bits that is methylated, which slowly decreases as the cells keep proliferating. This way, we won’t just store whether a certain signal has occured; we will also know when it happened.<br\>
Just storing whether certain signals have been sensed by the cell is only half of the story however. The proposed memory mechanism would be a form of volatile memory, of which the traces slowly dissappear as the E. memo-population keeps proliferating. This is because methylation-patterns are not transferred to the progeny in eukaryotes. We can use this our advantage. The most exciting part of our project would be to infer when a signal has been sensed from the percentage of bits that is methylated, which slowly decreases as the cells keep proliferating. This way, we won’t just store whether a certain signal has occured; we will also know when it happened.<br\>
 +
 +
</div>
 +
<div id="sub-menu" class="content-block">
<h2>Molecular mechanism</h2>
<h2>Molecular mechanism</h2>
Line 19: Line 30:
the span of time we can use to do measurements on.
the span of time we can use to do measurements on.
</div>
</div>
 +
</div>
 +
{{Team:Amsterdam/Foot}}
{{Team:Amsterdam/Foot}}

Latest revision as of 12:40, 14 September 2012

Project Description

Contents

Introduction

Prokaryotes have been selected through evolutionary processes for accurate sensing and acting upon their living environments. This bacterial versatility can be used by us, humans, to sense the environments in places we have trouble reaching. Maybe we would want to measure the conditions (e.g. nutrient availability, toxicity, pathogen presence, light) somewhere deep under the ground, perhaps we would want to noninvasively scan for biomarkers in diseased tissue in our bodies. The classical way to make a bacteria tell us whether a certain event has happened is to link it to the transcription of fluorescent proteins. This however requires constant monitoring and maintenance in order to get an idea of the time-variation of the studied system. Could we make the cell ‘remember’ what it has sensed and when so we can leave it alone for a while and make it report back to us later?

Meet The Cellulair Logbook, a methylation based memory module which uses the naturally occurring phenomenon of DNA methylation to robustly store signals it has sensed in its environment. The Amsterdam iGEM 2012 team, consisting of six students, will dedicate the summer to the realization of this innovative and ambitious plan. This novel storage mechanism, redesignating an evolutionarly designed tested and proven principle for novel purposes, could be linked to any of the many biological sensors that are available in the DNA parts registry. The Cellular Logbook therefore holds great promise as a detect & store–system for experimental and industrial purposes.

Just storing whether certain signals have been sensed by the cell is only half of the story however. The proposed memory mechanism would be a form of volatile memory, of which the traces slowly dissappear as the E. memo-population keeps proliferating. This is because methylation-patterns are not transferred to the progeny in eukaryotes. We can use this our advantage. The most exciting part of our project would be to infer when a signal has been sensed from the percentage of bits that is methylated, which slowly decreases as the cells keep proliferating. This way, we won’t just store whether a certain signal has occured; we will also know when it happened.

Molecular mechanism

In short, we will introduce a site-specific methyltransferase into the iGEM default chassis organism E. coli, that will only be active/transcribed when the measured signal is encountered by the logbook-cell. The activated methyltransferase will then move over to a plasmid region we’ve termed the bit and append a methyl-group to it. By linking the methyltransferase to a Zinc-Finger, its site-specificity is greatly increased, reducing the amount of undesired background methylation events to a minimum. Furthermore, by slowing down the cell replication cycle of the cells, we can increase the span of time we can use to do measurements on.

Retrieved from "http://2012.igem.org/Team:Amsterdam/project/description"