"
Team:Lyon-INSA/BiofilmK
From 2012.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
| (17 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Lyon-INSA/homeCss}} | {{Lyon-INSA/homeCss}} | ||
{{Lyon-INSA/videos}} | {{Lyon-INSA/videos}} | ||
| + | {{Lyon-INSA/fancybox}} | ||
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:og="http://ogp.me/ns#" xmlns:fb="https://www.facebook.com/2008/fbml" > | <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:og="http://ogp.me/ns#" xmlns:fb="https://www.facebook.com/2008/fbml" > | ||
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> | <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> | ||
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.7.2/jquery.min.js"></script> | <script type="text/javascript" src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.7.2/jquery.min.js"></script> | ||
| - | <link | + | <link href="http://cdn.jsdelivr.net/fancybox/2.1.0/jquery.fancybox.css"/><script type="text/javascript" src="http://cdn.jsdelivr.net/fancybox/2.1.0/jquery.fancybox.js"></script> |
| - | <script type="text/javascript" src="http:// | + | |
<script> | <script> | ||
$(document).ready(function(){ | $(document).ready(function(){ | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
<div id="pageContent"> | <div id="pageContent"> | ||
| - | <h1>The | + | <h1>The Lyon-INSA iGEM 2012 solution: “Biofilm Killer”</h1> |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
<div class="introduction contenuTexte" style="margin:20px;display:inline-block;margin-top:0"> | <div class="introduction contenuTexte" style="margin:20px;display:inline-block;margin-top:0"> | ||
<div style="float:left;width:600px"> | <div style="float:left;width:600px"> | ||
| - | <p>Biological solutions presented | + | <p>Biological solutions presented previously are very interesting and promising. But synthetic biology could make them even more powerful by providing a technology: |
| - | </br><ul><li>able to control, prevent and protect industrial equipment | + | </br><ul><li>able to control, prevent and protect industrial equipment;</li> |
| - | </ | + | <li>using non-persistent molecules in the environment;</li> |
| - | </ | + | <li>minimizing harm to individual, products and environment.</li></ul></p> |
<p></br> To meet these challenges, we have chosen to build a bacterial strain based on the environmental friendly <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> strain (already used to feed animals and promote healthy vegetable growth. “Biofilm Killer” was engineered to both destroy and then replace, if needed, the deleterious contamination by a positive biofilm. | <p></br> To meet these challenges, we have chosen to build a bacterial strain based on the environmental friendly <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> strain (already used to feed animals and promote healthy vegetable growth. “Biofilm Killer” was engineered to both destroy and then replace, if needed, the deleterious contamination by a positive biofilm. | ||
</br>Our solution is based on <u><strong>3 genetic modules: </strong></u></p> | </br>Our solution is based on <u><strong>3 genetic modules: </strong></u></p> | ||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
| - | <p><OL><li><strong>KILL and SCATTER</strong> the biofilm. The effect of the biocide and scattering agents produced by the bacteria can be enhanced by the “torpedo” behavior of the <i>Bacillus</i> swimmers | + | <p><OL><ul><li><strong>KILL and SCATTER</strong> the biofilm. The effect of the biocide and scattering agents produced by the bacteria can be enhanced by the “torpedo” behavior of the <i>Bacillus</i> swimmers;</li> |
| - | </ | + | <li><strong>COAT</strong> the surface with a surfactant reagent in presence of the inducteur 1 (xylose); </li> |
| - | </ | + | <li><strong>STICK</strong> to install a positif biofilm in presence of the inducteur 2 (IPTG).</li> |
| + | </ul> | ||
</br> </OL></p> | </br> </OL></p> | ||
| Line 61: | Line 62: | ||
In order to compare our biological solution to the currently used ones, we first approached companies whose concerns were similar to ours : they kindly gave us some of their data related to the price of their sterilizing solution.<br> | In order to compare our biological solution to the currently used ones, we first approached companies whose concerns were similar to ours : they kindly gave us some of their data related to the price of their sterilizing solution.<br> | ||
| - | <p> A first company that | + | <p> A first company that accepted to answer our questions estimated that, considering the use of chemical reagents (€50 per use : 3 kg of cleaning products, €15 of disinfectants) and of a sterilizing filter to recover biological waste (€100 to €300 per use depending on its size), the total cost of a 4-hour wash of a 1000L tank was from €165 to €365 ($215 to $475) per sterilization.<br></p> |
<p> The second one indicated a €480 ($625) cost estimation for a 1500L tank per sterilization.</p> | <p> The second one indicated a €480 ($625) cost estimation for a 1500L tank per sterilization.</p> | ||
| - | <br>Such estimations made us confident on the competitive potential of our bacteria, considering the low cost of their growth | + | <br>Such estimations made us confident on the competitive potential of our bacteria, considering the low cost of their growth. |
| - | <h1> Biofilm Killer implementation : a viable solution</h1> | + | <h1> <a style="text-decoration:none" name="solution"><font color="white">Biofilm Killer implementation : a viable solution</a></font></h1> |
| - | <p><br>We extrapolated both our results in 96 | + | <p><br>We extrapolated both our results in 96-well microplates, which showed us the optimal effective concentration of cells for a given surface (2.5x10<sup>8</sup> cells for a growth area of 0.34 cm² covered by <i>S. aureus</i>), and the market prices for genetically modified <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> freeze-dryed cells to an industrial facility model (1000L tank plus 20m of pipes). We used two different prices in our calculations: the average price ($5.55 / kg) and the highest price ($9.58 / kg). |
| - | <br>In the end, we estimated that the bacterial cost of the sterilization of | + | <br>In the end, we estimated that the bacterial cost of the sterilization of our model 1000L facility would be <strong>$0.3 per use</strong> in the first case and <strong>$0.5 per use</strong> in the second one. However, to confine the biological waste, we would also need a double 0.45/ 0.2 µm filter, so that the global price would be increased by at least $100. We also developped a sterilization protocol for this tank (see below) :</p> |
| - | <br><center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/ | + | <br><center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/c/c2/Schema_tank_2.png" width="700px"/></center> |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
| + | <p>Besides, we generalized our biological prices in relation to a 1 m<sup>2</sup> surface to sterilize : it would then be <strong>$0.06 / m<sup>2</sup></strong> for the average price and <strong>$0.1 / m<sup>2</sup></strong> for the highest one. | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | "Biofilm Killer" could be conditioned in 25kg bags of freeze-dried cells (usual conditioning in the market) and proposed to sale at an attractive price (estimated $12.25, FOB price). | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| Line 80: | Line 85: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="introduction contenuTexte" style="margin:20px;display:inline-block;width:95%;"> | <div class="introduction contenuTexte" style="margin:20px;display:inline-block;width:95%;"> | ||
| - | <strong>Lower cost</strong> : No need to have a protein purification step which is very expensive. | + | <p><strong>Lower cost</strong> : No need to have a protein purification step which is very expensive. |
<br/><strong>Eco-friendly</strong>: “Biofilm Killer” won’t release toxic chemicals in the environment since the proteins used can be easily destroyed. | <br/><strong>Eco-friendly</strong>: “Biofilm Killer” won’t release toxic chemicals in the environment since the proteins used can be easily destroyed. | ||
| - | <br/><strong>The “biological swiss-knife”</strong>: “Biofilm Killer” should be able to replace mechanical cleaning actions thanks to the swarming properties of our strain which can penetrate deep inside the biofilm and release the active molecules <i>in situ</i> all over the biofilm. | + | <br/><strong>The “biological swiss-knife”</strong>: “Biofilm Killer” should be able to replace mechanical cleaning actions thanks to the swarming properties of our strain which can penetrate deep inside the biofilm and release the active molecules <i>in situ</i> all over the biofilm.</p> |
Latest revision as of 12:00, 8 June 2013
The Lyon-INSA iGEM 2012 solution: “Biofilm Killer”
Biological solutions presented previously are very interesting and promising. But synthetic biology could make them even more powerful by providing a technology:
- able to control, prevent and protect industrial equipment;
- using non-persistent molecules in the environment;
- minimizing harm to individual, products and environment.
To meet these challenges, we have chosen to build a bacterial strain based on the environmental friendly Bacillus subtilis strain (already used to feed animals and promote healthy vegetable growth. “Biofilm Killer” was engineered to both destroy and then replace, if needed, the deleterious contamination by a positive biofilm. Our solution is based on 3 genetic modules:
- KILL and SCATTER the biofilm. The effect of the biocide and scattering agents produced by the bacteria can be enhanced by the “torpedo” behavior of the Bacillus swimmers;
- COAT the surface with a surfactant reagent in presence of the inducteur 1 (xylose);
- STICK to install a positif biofilm in presence of the inducteur 2 (IPTG).
Estimating the cost of the current industrial solutions
In order to compare our biological solution to the currently used ones, we first approached companies whose concerns were similar to ours : they kindly gave us some of their data related to the price of their sterilizing solution.
Such estimations made us confident on the competitive potential of our bacteria, considering the low cost of their growth.
A first company that accepted to answer our questions estimated that, considering the use of chemical reagents (€50 per use : 3 kg of cleaning products, €15 of disinfectants) and of a sterilizing filter to recover biological waste (€100 to €300 per use depending on its size), the total cost of a 4-hour wash of a 1000L tank was from €165 to €365 ($215 to $475) per sterilization.
The second one indicated a €480 ($625) cost estimation for a 1500L tank per sterilization.
Such estimations made us confident on the competitive potential of our bacteria, considering the low cost of their growth.
Biofilm Killer implementation : a viable solution
We extrapolated both our results in 96-well microplates, which showed us the optimal effective concentration of cells for a given surface (2.5x108 cells for a growth area of 0.34 cm² covered by S. aureus), and the market prices for genetically modified Bacillus subtilis freeze-dryed cells to an industrial facility model (1000L tank plus 20m of pipes). We used two different prices in our calculations: the average price ($5.55 / kg) and the highest price ($9.58 / kg).
In the end, we estimated that the bacterial cost of the sterilization of our model 1000L facility would be $0.3 per use in the first case and $0.5 per use in the second one. However, to confine the biological waste, we would also need a double 0.45/ 0.2 µm filter, so that the global price would be increased by at least $100. We also developped a sterilization protocol for this tank (see below) :
Besides, we generalized our biological prices in relation to a 1 m2 surface to sterilize : it would then be $0.06 / m2 for the average price and $0.1 / m2 for the highest one.
"Biofilm Killer" could be conditioned in 25kg bags of freeze-dried cells (usual conditioning in the market) and proposed to sale at an attractive price (estimated $12.25, FOB price).
Main advantages
Lower cost : No need to have a protein purification step which is very expensive.
Eco-friendly: “Biofilm Killer” won’t release toxic chemicals in the environment since the proteins used can be easily destroyed.
The “biological swiss-knife”: “Biofilm Killer” should be able to replace mechanical cleaning actions thanks to the swarming properties of our strain which can penetrate deep inside the biofilm and release the active molecules in situ all over the biofilm.
