Team:ZJU-China/project.htm
From 2012.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
(30 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 129: | Line 129: | ||
padding: 0px 10px; | padding: 0px 10px; | ||
margin: 0; | margin: 0; | ||
- | |||
align: justify; | align: justify; | ||
} | } | ||
Line 147: | Line 146: | ||
align: justify; | align: justify; | ||
} | } | ||
- | + | b.orange{ | |
+ | color: #FF8000; | ||
+ | font-style:italic; | ||
+ | } | ||
h5{ | h5{ | ||
Line 339: | Line 341: | ||
<!--Content Goes Here--> | <!--Content Goes Here--> | ||
- | <p align="justify">In cells, engineered multi-enzyme pathways are common and are often physically and spatially organized, thus leading to the high output efficiency. But engineered synthetic pathways utilizing non-homologous enzymes often suffer from low efficiency of production caused by relative lack of spatial organization. RNA scaffold is designed to co-localize enzymes through interactions between binding domains on the scaffold and target peptides fused to each enzyme in engineered biological pathways in vivo. The scaffold allows efficient channeling of substrates to products over several enzymatic steps by limiting the diffusion of intermediates thus providing a bright future for solving the problem.</p> | + | <p align="justify">In cells, engineered multi-enzyme pathways are common and are often physically and spatially organized, thus leading to the high output efficiency. But engineered synthetic pathways utilizing non-homologous enzymes often suffer from low efficiency of production caused by relative lack of spatial organization. <b class="orange">RNA scaffold is designed to co-localize enzymes through interactions between binding domains on the scaffold and target peptides fused to each enzyme in engineered biological pathways <i>in vivo</i></b>. The scaffold allows <b class="orange">efficient channeling of substrates to products</b> over several enzymatic steps by <b class="orange">limiting the diffusion of intermediates</b> thus providing a bright future for solving the problem.</p> |
<p align="justify"> </p> | <p align="justify"> </p> | ||
- | <p align="justify">ZJU-China aims to design and realize tunable RNA scaffolds to accelerate biological pathways and control them on and off. In order to achieve the object, we added an aptamer structure on RNA scaffold as a switch to regulate biological pathways by micromolecular ligands. Then we can control the all-or-none binding relationship between the enzymes and the scaffold by the absence and the presence of a special ligand. </p> | + | <p align="justify">ZJU-China aims to design and realize tunable RNA scaffolds to accelerate biological pathways and control them on and off. In order to achieve the object, we added an aptamer structure on RNA scaffold as a switch to regulate biological pathways by micromolecular ligands. Then we can <b class="orange">control the all-or-none binding relationship</b> between the enzymes and the scaffold by the absence and the presence of a special ligand. </p> |
<p align="justify"> </p> | <p align="justify"> </p> | ||
<p align="justify">We demonstrated RNA scaffold do make the split GFPs get closer and fluoresce. As was expected, the riboscaffold with a theophylline aptamer can be regulated by theophylline in the range of 0-0.5mM IPTG. A scaffold library was also desired. By changing the sequence of MS2 aptamer binding site, we made the fluorescent decreased. The mutations with different arm length decrease the fluorescent intensity of split GPF by extending the distance between two split GFP parts FA and FB. It provides a series of half-on scaffolds. </p> | <p align="justify">We demonstrated RNA scaffold do make the split GFPs get closer and fluoresce. As was expected, the riboscaffold with a theophylline aptamer can be regulated by theophylline in the range of 0-0.5mM IPTG. A scaffold library was also desired. By changing the sequence of MS2 aptamer binding site, we made the fluorescent decreased. The mutations with different arm length decrease the fluorescent intensity of split GPF by extending the distance between two split GFP parts FA and FB. It provides a series of half-on scaffolds. </p> | ||
Line 356: | Line 358: | ||
<!--Content Goes Here--> | <!--Content Goes Here--> | ||
- | <p align="justify">In cells, engineered multi-enzyme pathways are common and are often physically and spatially organized, thus leading to the high output efficiency. But engineered synthetic pathways utilizing non-homologous enzymes often suffer from low efficienty of production caused by relative lack of spatial organization. Thus important issue lies in the method to increase the efficiency of the multi-enzyme pathways. </p> | + | <p align="justify">In cells, engineered multi-enzyme pathways are common and are often physically and spatially organized, thus leading to the high output efficiency. But engineered synthetic pathways utilizing non-homologous enzymes often suffer from low efficienty of production caused by relative lack of spatial organization. Thus important issue lies in the method to <b class="orange">increase the efficiency of the multi-enzyme pathways</b>. </p> |
<p align="justify"> </p> | <p align="justify"> </p> | ||
- | <p align="justify">Protein scaffolds can be designed to make enzymes closed through interactions between binding domains on the scaffold and target peptides fused to each enzyme. However, protein scaffold is usually large, has limit binding sites, and is hard to be engineered in architecture. DNA can be designed to self-assemble in vitro into many and varied nanostructures. However, DNA scaffold is hard to be controlled and might cause some potential problems in vivo. By contrast, RNA scaffold shows great advantages. For instance, RNA is more flexible, whose structures are varied, thus leading to their ease to splice. RNA scaffold is able to be controlled and has a satisfactory regulating efficiency. RNA scaffold works fast, because it doesn’t need translation like protein scaffold. Camille J. Delebecque and his colleagues have designed and assembled RNA structures and used them to speed up the reaction of hydrogen production. And that is what our project based on.</p> | + | <p align="justify">Protein scaffolds can be designed to make enzymes closed through interactions between binding domains on the scaffold and target peptides fused to each enzyme. However, protein scaffold is usually large, has limit binding sites, and is hard to be engineered in architecture. DNA can be designed to self-assemble in vitro into many and varied nanostructures. However, DNA scaffold is hard to be controlled and might cause some potential problems <i>in vivo</i>. By contrast, RNA scaffold shows great advantages. For instance, <b class="orange">RNA is more flexible</b>, whose structures are varied, thus leading to their ease to splice. RNA scaffold is able <b class="orange">to be controlled</b> and has a satisfactory regulating efficiency</b>. RNA scaffold <b class="orange">works fast</b>, because it doesn’t need translation like protein scaffold. Camille J. Delebecque and his colleagues have designed and assembled RNA structures and used them to speed up the reaction of hydrogen production. And that is what our project based on.</p> |
<p align="justify"> </p> | <p align="justify"> </p> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/b/b7/Zju_Backround_syn_and_bio.png" width="700px" /> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/b/b7/Zju_Backround_syn_and_bio.png" width="700px" /> | ||
Line 379: | Line 381: | ||
<!-----------Figure!!!!--------------> | <!-----------Figure!!!!--------------> | ||
<div class="floatC"> | <div class="floatC"> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/d/dc/ZJU_PROJECT_S0_Scaffold_d.jpg" width=" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/d/dc/ZJU_PROJECT_S0_Scaffold_d.jpg" width="500px" /> |
<p> </p> | <p> </p> | ||
<p class="fig" align="justify"><b>Fig.1</b> How RNA scaffold works. FA and FB represent two halves of EGFP. FA and MS2 are connected with a linker of 30bp. FB and PP7 did the same. The purple scaffold is scaffold D0. MS2 and PP7 can specifically bind to two stem-loops on scaffold, thus FA and FB get closer and fluoresce under excitation of 480nm.</p> | <p class="fig" align="justify"><b>Fig.1</b> How RNA scaffold works. FA and FB represent two halves of EGFP. FA and MS2 are connected with a linker of 30bp. FB and PP7 did the same. The purple scaffold is scaffold D0. MS2 and PP7 can specifically bind to two stem-loops on scaffold, thus FA and FB get closer and fluoresce under excitation of 480nm.</p> | ||
Line 392: | Line 394: | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
<h5>1). pCJDFA: FA-MS2 cloned into T7 duet expression vectors pACYCDuet-1 Spr</h5> | <h5>1). pCJDFA: FA-MS2 cloned into T7 duet expression vectors pACYCDuet-1 Spr</h5> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/ | + | <div class="floatC"> |
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/b/b0/FA.png" width="450px" /> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
<p> </p> | <p> </p> | ||
+ | |||
<h5>2) pCJDFB (FB-PP7 cloned into T7 duet expression vector pCOLADuet-1) Kanr</h5> | <h5>2) pCJDFB (FB-PP7 cloned into T7 duet expression vector pCOLADuet-1) Kanr</h5> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/ | + | <div class="floatC"> |
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/5/56/FB.png" width="450px" /> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
<p> </p> | <p> </p> | ||
<h5>3) pCJDD0 (Scaffold D0 cloned into T7 duet expression vector PETDuet) Ampr</h5> | <h5>3) pCJDD0 (Scaffold D0 cloned into T7 duet expression vector PETDuet) Ampr</h5> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/f/ | + | <div class="floatC"> |
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/f/fa/D0.png" width="450px" /> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
<p> </p> | <p> </p> | ||
<p><h5>4) BL21-star(DE3)</h5> | <p><h5>4) BL21-star(DE3)</h5> | ||
Line 410: | Line 419: | ||
<p align="justify">Wash the bacteria twice with equivalent PBS. Then test the Fluorescence intensity (FI) and OD with Biotek Synergy Hybrid Reader. | <p align="justify">Wash the bacteria twice with equivalent PBS. Then test the Fluorescence intensity (FI) and OD with Biotek Synergy Hybrid Reader. | ||
<p> </p> | <p> </p> | ||
- | <p align="justify">Data was shown in Fig.3. The fluorescence of different expression systems are pictured by Olympus fluoview fv1000 confocal laser scanning microscope ( Fig.2)<p> | + | <p align="justify">Data was shown in Fig.3. The fluorescence of different expression systems are pictured by Olympus fluoview fv1000 confocal laser scanning microscope (Fig.2)<p> |
Line 416: | Line 425: | ||
<p> </p> | <p> </p> | ||
<h2>Results</h2> | <h2>Results</h2> | ||
- | <p | + | <p> </p> |
+ | <p>Contrasted to the fluorescence intensity (FI) of the E.coli which only express FA-MS2 and FB-PP7 fusion proteins, the fluorescence intensity of the E.coli with scaffold D0 was obviously increased. Thus, it was possible for us to carry out our development and reformation of RNA scaffold.</p> | ||
+ | <p> </p> | ||
+ | <div class="floatC"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/5/53/ZJU_PROJECT_S0_Confocal.jpg" width="500px" /> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <p class="fig"><b>Fig.2</b> FI of Split GFPs without or with RNA scaffold. A. BL21*(DE3) transformed with pCJDFA and pCJDFB. B. BL21*(DE3) transformed with pCJDFA, pCJDFB and pCJDD0. The contrast of FI obviously shown that RNA scaffold D0 could bind split GFPs together, so that split GFPs could fluoresce. (Pictures were obtained with Olympus fluoview fv1000 confocal laser scanning microscope, using a 60X objective.)</p> | ||
+ | <p> </p> | ||
+ | <div class="floatC"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/6/6f/0921.png" width="500px" /> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <p class="fig"><b>Fig.3</b> FI/OD of different transformation groups. There exist significant differences among three groups. And as expected, split GFPs with scaffold D0 together can fluoresce stronger than those without scaffold. </p> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | <h3>Reference:</h3> | ||
+ | <p class="ref">1. Thodey, K. & Smolke, C.D. Bringing It Together with RNA. Science 333, 412-413 (2011).</br> | ||
+ | 2. Delebecque, C.J., Lindner, A.B., Silver, P.A. & Aldaye, F.A. Organization of Intracellular Reactions with Rationally Designed RNA Assemblies. Science 333, 470-474 (2011).</p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p> </p> | ||
+ | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div><!-- end .acc_container --> | </div><!-- end .acc_container --> | ||
- | <h2 class="acc_trigger">04 <strong>S1: | + | <h2 class="acc_trigger">04 <strong>S1: ALLOSCAFFOLD</strong></h2> |
<div class="acc_container" style="display: none; "> | <div class="acc_container" style="display: none; "> | ||
Line 427: | Line 454: | ||
<div class="projectNav"> | <div class="projectNav"> | ||
<table class="tm"> | <table class="tm"> | ||
- | <tr><td class="tm" width=" | + | <tr><td class="tm" width="450px"> |
<div class="projectNavFloat"> | <div class="projectNavFloat"> | ||
- | <a target="brainFrame" href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:ZJU-China/project_s1_1.htm">1. Summary</a><br> | + | <a target="brainFrame" href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:ZJU-China/project_s1_1.htm" style="text-decoration:none">1. Summary</a><br> |
- | <a target="brainFrame" href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:ZJU-China/project_s1_2.htm">2. Design</a><br> | + | <a target="brainFrame" href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:ZJU-China/project_s1_2.htm" style="text-decoration:none">2. Design</a><br> |
- | <a target="brainFrame" href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:ZJU-China/ | + | <a target="brainFrame" href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:ZJU-China/project_s1_4.htm" style="text-decoration:none">3. Preparation: Characterize previous parts</a> |
<br> | <br> | ||
</div><!-- end .projectNavFloat --> | </div><!-- end .projectNavFloat --> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
- | <td class="tm" width=" | + | <td class="tm" width="250px"> |
<div class="projectNavFloat"> | <div class="projectNavFloat"> | ||
- | <a target="brainFrame" href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:ZJU-China/ | + | <a target="brainFrame" href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:ZJU-China/project_s1_3.htm" style="text-decoration:none">4. Characterization</a><br> |
- | <a target="brainFrame" href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:ZJU-China/project_s1_5.htm">5. Results</a> | + | <a target="brainFrame" href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:ZJU-China/project_s1_5.htm" style="text-decoration:none">5. Results</a> |
</div><!-- end .projectNavFloat --> | </div><!-- end .projectNavFloat --> | ||
Line 476: | Line 503: | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
<div class="floatC"> | <div class="floatC"> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/ | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/3/36/TypeL.png" width="450px" /> |
<p class="fig"><b>fig 1b.</b> The result of arm length mutating. Both D0M4 and D0M5 scaffold half-on GEP.</p> | <p class="fig"><b>fig 1b.</b> The result of arm length mutating. Both D0M4 and D0M5 scaffold half-on GEP.</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 482: | Line 509: | ||
<h3>2. Mutating aptamer binding site</h3> | <h3>2. Mutating aptamer binding site</h3> | ||
<p>Mutating the PP7 and MS2 binding sites prevented protein scaffolding. Preventing protein scaffolding lead to the key enzyme dissociation and the decrease of enzyme local concentration. By chancing the sequence of MS2 aptamer binding site, the fluorescent light decreased. D0M3 in our project is the molecular with mutated aptamer binding site. Split GFP experiment shows that there is a significant difference between D0 an D0M3(P≦0.05, fig2.c). Camille J. Delebecque has done the same work for the H2 biosynthesis pathway.</p> | <p>Mutating the PP7 and MS2 binding sites prevented protein scaffolding. Preventing protein scaffolding lead to the key enzyme dissociation and the decrease of enzyme local concentration. By chancing the sequence of MS2 aptamer binding site, the fluorescent light decreased. D0M3 in our project is the molecular with mutated aptamer binding site. Split GFP experiment shows that there is a significant difference between D0 an D0M3(P≦0.05, fig2.c). Camille J. Delebecque has done the same work for the H2 biosynthesis pathway.</p> | ||
- | < | + | </br> |
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/a/ad/Zju_library_Fig2a.jpg" width=" | + | <table class="tm" align="center"> |
- | + | <tr> | |
- | < | + | <td class="tm"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/a/ad/Zju_library_Fig2a.jpg" width="300px" /></td> |
- | + | <td class="tm"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/9/98/Zju_library_Fig2b.jpg" width="300px" /></td> | |
- | + | </tr> | |
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/9/98/Zju_library_Fig2b.jpg" width=" | + | </table> |
- | <p class="fig"><b>Fig2b.</b> By mutating aptamer binding site, scaffolding is stop. </p | + | <p class="fig"><b>Fig2a.</b> MS2 and PP7 bind to the scaffold and make GFP work. </br> |
- | + | <b>Fig2b.</b> By mutating aptamer binding site, scaffolding is stop. </p> | |
<p> </p> | <p> </p> | ||
<div class="floatC"> | <div class="floatC"> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/ | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/9/9b/TypeA.png" width="400px"/> |
<p class="fig"><b>Fig2c.</b> significant difference between D0 an D0M3</p> | <p class="fig"><b>Fig2c.</b> significant difference between D0 an D0M3</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 521: | Line 548: | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
<div class="floatC"> | <div class="floatC"> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/2/2f/Zju_library_Fig4a.jpg" width=" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/2/2f/Zju_library_Fig4a.jpg" width="300px" /> |
</div> | </div> | ||
- | <p class="fig"><b>Fig4a.</b> Dimerization and trimerization. Protein binding site is sealed off by the scaffolds themselves. Too much scaffold molecular lend to the self regulation.</ | + | <table class="tm" align="center"> |
- | < | + | <tr> |
- | < | + | <td class="tm"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/b/be/Zju_library_Fig4b.jpg" width="200px" /></td> |
+ | <td class="tm"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/8/8d/Zju_library_Fig4c.jpg" width="200px" /></td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | <p class="fig"><b>Fig4a.(Upper)</b> Dimerization and trimerization. Protein binding site is sealed off by the scaffolds themselves. Too much scaffold molecular lend to the self regulation.</br> | ||
+ | <b>Fig4b.(Lower left)</b> Dimerization and trimerization. Protein binding site is sealed off by the scaffolds themselves. Too much scaffold molecular lend to the self regulation.</br> | ||
+ | <b>Fig4c.(Lower right)</b> Polo-scaffold be made by head-tail binding.</p> | ||
+ | <p> </p> | ||
+ | <p>Several RNA scaffold mutations are constructed and characterize, but they are the tip of the iceberg. There is still plenty to do in this part. The charms of library are the selection and combination. It introduces a new concept of biobrick combination mode.</p> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
- | < | + | </div><!-- end .acc_container --> |
+ | |||
+ | <h2 class="acc_trigger">06 <strong>S3: BIOSYNTHESIS OF IAA</strong></h2> | ||
+ | <div class="acc_container" style="display: none; "> | ||
+ | <div style="height:800px;overflow:scroll;"> | ||
+ | <h2>Background</h2> | ||
+ | <p>Indole 3-acetic acid (IAA) is a plant growth hormone that serves as a potent and important auxin to many plants. Although auxin is a key factor for plant growth, it can be a metabolic burden to plants at high concentrations and prohibit plant growth, which contrasts its initial goal. </p> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | <p>Imperial College London 2011 iGME team claimed that molecules of IAA are chemically labile in aqueous solution, so they produce IAA in soil to promote rather than stunt plant root growth. They also regulated output of IAA through change However, root sensitivity to IAA differs from variety to variety. There is no guarantee that a changeless IAA production will fit in all situation. Our designed RNA alloscaffold makes it possible to change the output of IAA in a range to adapt the need of plant root growth.</p> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | <p>There are two enzymes responsible for IAA biosynthesis in <i>E.coli</i>, IaaM and IaaH. IaaM catalyzes tryptophan to Indole-3-acetamide while IaaH catalyzes it to Indole-3-acetic acid.</p> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
<div class="floatC"> | <div class="floatC"> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/ | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/e/e8/IAA_pathway.png" width="500px"/> |
- | + | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
- | + | </br> | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
+ | <h2>Experiment Design</h2> | ||
+ | <p>With the help of riboscaffold, we can regulate IAA biosynthesis in the following two aspects, increasing yields and regulating reaction speed.</p> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | <p>IaaM and IaaH were fused to a dimer of MS2 and a single copy of PP7 protein respectively (in plasmids pZCM and pZCH).</p> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | <div class="floatC"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/c/c3/PZCM.png" width="400px"/><br/><br/> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/b/b4/PZCH.png" width="400px"/> | ||
+ | <p class="fig"><b>Fig 1.</b> pZCM (the upper one) and pZCH (the lower one)</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
- | + | </br> | |
+ | <h3>1. Increasing yields</h3> | ||
+ | <p>Basic scaffold D0 has been proved to be effective in bringing two proteins closer by split-GFP assay. We further proved that D0 can be used in accelerating reaction speed.</p> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | <p>Basic scaffold D0 (in plasmids pCJDD0) and pZCM, pZCH were transform into <i>E.coli</i> strain BL21*(DE3) for co-expression.</p> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | <div class="floatC"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/b/b8/IAA-1.png" width="500px" /> | ||
+ | <p class="fig"><b>Fig 2.</b> Two enzymes related to the reaction are fused to basic scaffold D0 to get spatial organized</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | <h3>2. Regulating reaction speed</h3> | ||
+ | <p>Alloscaffolds (clover 2 and clover 3) have been proved to be effective in regulating distance between two proteins by split-GFP assay. We further proved that they can be used in regulating reaction speed.</p> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | <p>The interaction inhibits the binding function of MS2 aptamer in the absence of theophylline. IaaM-2X-MS2 cannot bind on RNA scaffold thus the speed of reaction is normal.</p> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | <div class="floatC"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/2/21/IAA-3.png" width="500px" /> | ||
+ | <p class="fig"><b>Fig 3.</b> Illustration of alloscaffolds in biosynthesis pathway.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <p>When theophylline is added, the fold of the loop is changed and thus the interaction will disappear, leading to the binding of MS2 aptamer and corresponding protein. IaaM and IaaH will get closer to accelerate reaction speed.</p> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | <p>When theophylline is added, the fold of the loop is changed and thus the interaction will disappear, leading to the binding of MS2 aptamer and corresponding protein. IaaM and IaaH will get closer to accelerate reaction speed.</p> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | <p>Alloscaffolds (in plasmids pZCCOV2 and pZCCOV3) and pZCM, pZCH were transformed into E.coli strain BL21*(DE3) for coexpression.</p> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | <h2>Results</h2> | ||
+ | <h3>1. Standard curve</h3> | ||
+ | <p>We plan to determined the concentration of IAA with salkowski assay. The standard curve has been made with IAA in LB.</p> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | <div class="floatC"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/2/25/IAA_standard_curve.png" width="500px" /> | ||
+ | <p class="fig"><b>Fig 4.</b> Standard curve for testing IAA concentration.</p> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <p>Our experiment is on going, click <a class="parts" href="http://bis.zju.edu.cn/igem2012/project-biosyn-result.htm" target="_blank">here</a> for latest results.</p> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | </div><!-- end of IAA biosynthesis --> | ||
+ | </div><!-- end .acc_container --> | ||
- | + | <h2 class="acc_trigger">07 <strong>S4: POLYSCAFFOLD</strong></h2> | |
<div class="acc_container" style="display: none; "> | <div class="acc_container" style="display: none; "> | ||
<!--Content Goes Here--> | <!--Content Goes Here--> | ||
- | |||
<div class="projectNav"> | <div class="projectNav"> | ||
- | + | <table class="tm"> | |
- | + | <tr><td class="tm" width="300px"> | |
- | + | <div class="projectNavFloat"> | |
- | + | <a target="s4Frame" href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:ZJU-China/project_s4_1.htm" style="text-decoration:none">1. Summary</a><br/> | |
- | + | ||
- | + | <a target="s4Frame" href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:ZJU-China/project_s4_2.htm" style="text-decoration:none">2. Design</a><br/> | |
- | + | </div><!-- end .projectNavFloat --> | |
- | + | </td> | |
- | + | <td class="tm" width="350px"> | |
- | + | <div class="projectNavFloat"> | |
- | + | <a target="s4Frame" href="http://bis.zju.edu.cn/igem2012/project-s4-3.htm" style="text-decoration:none">3. Results</a><br/> | |
- | + | ||
- | + | <a target="s4Frame" href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:ZJU-China/project_s4_4.htm" style="text-decoration:none">4. Future Work</a><br> | |
- | + | </div><!-- end .projectNavFloat --> | |
- | + | </td></tr> | |
- | + | </table> | |
- | + | <br class="clearfloat" /> | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | <br class="clearfloat"> | + | |
</div><!-- end .projectNav --> | </div><!-- end .projectNav --> | ||
- | + | <iframe src="" frameborder="0" name="s4Frame" width="100%" height="500px"> </iframe> | |
- | |||
+ | </div><!-- end .acc_container --> | ||
- | <h2 class="acc_trigger"> | + | <h2 class="acc_trigger">08 <strong>PARTS</strong></h2> |
<div class="acc_container" style="display: none; "> | <div class="acc_container" style="display: none; "> | ||
Line 666: | Line 751: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div><!-- end .acc_container --> | </div><!-- end .acc_container --> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
Line 787: | Line 804: | ||
<b>Fig3.2.(Upper right)</b> Long scaffold that has multiple binding sites.</br> | <b>Fig3.2.(Upper right)</b> Long scaffold that has multiple binding sites.</br> | ||
<b>Fig3.3.(Lower Left)</b> A possible device built by LEGO riboscaffold.</br> | <b>Fig3.3.(Lower Left)</b> A possible device built by LEGO riboscaffold.</br> | ||
- | <b>Fig3.4.(Lower Right)</b> Sheets and tubes constructed by LEGO riboscaffolds in vivo. [6]</p> | + | <b>Fig3.4.(Lower Right)</b> Sheets and tubes constructed by LEGO riboscaffolds <i>in vivo</i>. [6]</p> |
</br> | </br> | ||
<h2>4. Activator scaffold</h2> | <h2>4. Activator scaffold</h2> |