Team:Carnegie Mellon/Met-Results
From 2012.igem.org
(37 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- Nav Bar --> | <!-- Nav Bar --> | ||
- | |||
<ul class="sf-menu sf-navbar"> | <ul class="sf-menu sf-navbar"> | ||
<li style ='width: 193px'> | <li style ='width: 193px'> | ||
Line 16: | Line 15: | ||
<li> | <li> | ||
<a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Carnegie_Mellon/Hom-Team">Team</a> | <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Carnegie_Mellon/Hom-Team">Team</a> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li> | ||
+ | <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Carnegie_Mellon/Hom-Attributions">Attributions</a> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
<li> | <li> | ||
Line 72: | Line 74: | ||
<li> | <li> | ||
<a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Carnegie_Mellon/Mod-Matlab">Matlab</a> | <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Carnegie_Mellon/Mod-Matlab">Matlab</a> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li> | ||
+ | <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Carnegie_Mellon/Mod-Expanded">Expanded</a> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
Line 79: | Line 84: | ||
<a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Carnegie_Mellon/Hum-Overview">Human Practices</a> | <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Carnegie_Mellon/Hum-Overview">Human Practices</a> | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
- | <li class = 'offset' style ='width: | + | <li class = 'offset' style ='width: 302px'> <a href="#"></a></li> |
<li> | <li> | ||
<a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Carnegie_Mellon/Hum-Overview">Overview</a> | <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Carnegie_Mellon/Hum-Overview">Overview</a> | ||
Line 91: | Line 96: | ||
<li> | <li> | ||
<a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Carnegie_Mellon/Hum-Software">Software</a> | <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Carnegie_Mellon/Hum-Software">Software</a> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li> | ||
+ | <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Carnegie_Mellon/Hum-Team">Team Presentation</a> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li> | ||
+ | <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Carnegie_Mellon/Hum-Teaching">Teaching Presentation</a> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
Line 96: | Line 107: | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
<br /><br /><br /> | <br /><br /><br /> | ||
+ | |||
Line 123: | Line 135: | ||
<h1>Dosage Curves of Spinach and FAP with Their Respective Dyes</h1> | <h1>Dosage Curves of Spinach and FAP with Their Respective Dyes</h1> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
- | + | To understand binding kinetics and equilibria of both Spinach and FAP with their respective fluorogens, we collected dosage curves of the biosensors by adding different concentrations of fluorogens to bacteria that express both Spinach and FAP. Based on the dosage curves, we calculated dissociation constants (K<sub>D</sub>) of each biosensor-fluorogen complex and saturating dose of each fluorogen. | |
</p> | </p> | ||
- | <br | + | <br> |
<p> | <p> | ||
<img src="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/images/f/f8/CMU_Spin-DFHBI1.jpg", width="729", height="430"> <br \> | <img src="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/images/f/f8/CMU_Spin-DFHBI1.jpg", width="729", height="430"> <br \> | ||
- | <strong>Figure 1 | + | <strong>Figure 1: Fluorescence intensities of Spinach-DFHBI at a fixed concentration of Spinach and different concentrations of added DFHBI </strong>. |
+ | <br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | The measured K<sub>D</sub> of the Spinach-DFHBI complex is 537nM <sup>[2]</sup>. Our measured K<sub>D</sub> also has a nanomolar affinity. We also measured the dosage curves at both 10th and 60th minute timepoint. We did not observe significant differences in the fluorescence levels, suggesting that DFHBI diffusion across bacterial membrane and its binding to Spinach occurs rapidly. Lines are drawn as guide of eyes. Please refer to the Protocols page for details of experiments. | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
<img src="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/images/1/14/CMU_FAP-MG1.jpg", width="729", height="436"> <br \> | <img src="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/images/1/14/CMU_FAP-MG1.jpg", width="729", height="436"> <br \> | ||
- | <strong>Figure 2 | + | <strong>Figure 2: Fluorescence intensities of FAP-MG at a fixed concentration of FAP and different concentrations of added MG </strong>. |
+ | <br> | ||
+ | The measured K<sub>D</sub> of the FAP-MG complex is close to the published value of 320nM <sup>[1]</sup>. A line is drawn as guide of eyes. Please refer to the Protocols page for details of experiments. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 139: | Line 157: | ||
<h1>RNA and Protein Expression Levels of T7Lac Promoters</h1> | <h1>RNA and Protein Expression Levels of T7Lac Promoters</h1> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
- | + | We aim to compare expression levels of three new T7Lac promoters with the wild-type T7Lac promoter, when either 3,5-difluoro-4-hydroxybenzylidene imidazolinone (DFHBI) or Malachite Green (MG) is added. DFHBI is a specific fluorogen that binds to Spinach and MG is a specific fluorogen that binds to FAP. Therefore, we assume that there is a positive correlation between fluorescence values and the amount of either RNA and proteins in bacteria. | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
- | <img src=" | + | <p> |
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/5/5c/CMU_Spin-DFHBI2.jpg", width="689", height="384"><br> | ||
+ | <strong>Figure 3: Spinach fluorescence (reporter for RNA levels) over time</strong>. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
- | Mutant I closely parallels the wild-type promoter in terms of magnitudes and expression rates of Spinach | + | Fluorescence values increase over time with all promoters. Mutant I (BBa_K921000) closely parallels the wild-type promoter in terms of magnitudes and expression rates of Spinach. Mutant II (BBa_K921001) exhibits significantly lower fluorescence levels than the wild-type promoter, indicating slower mRNA transcription rates. Fluorescence levels of mutant III (BBa_K921002) seems to be increasing at an accelerating rate as compared to the wild-type promoter and reach a significantly higher fluorescence level at the end of the experiment. All fluorescence values are normalized by the corresponding OD600 readings. Each error bar indicates one standard deviation of two replicates. Please refer to the Time-Lapse protocol in the Protocols page for the full experimental details. |
- | <br | + | <br><br> |
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/d/d0/CMU_FAP-MG2.jpg", width="689", height="384"><br> | ||
+ | <strong>Figure 4: FAP fluorescence (reporter for protein levels) over time </strong>. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | Fluorescence values increase over time with all promoters. The fluorescence level of Mutant I (BBa_K921000) increases more rapidly than the other constructs, indicating that this promoter indirectly increases the translation rate of mRNA. Fluorescence levels of mutant II (BBa_K921001) closely parallels the wild type fluorescence levels, being only slightly lower in magnitude. Mutant III's fluorescence levels (BBa_K921002) increase very rapidly at first, but seems to be leveling off after one hour. This may indicate that bacteria have adapted host machinery to compensate for the metabolic burden. The metabolic burden could also result in larger OD600 and fluorescence fluctuations across replicates, which could give rise to large error bars. All fluorescence values are normalized by the corresponding OD600 readings. Each error bar indicates one standard error of two replicates. Please refer to the Time-Lapse protocol in the Protocols page for the full experimental details. | ||
- | < | + | <br><br> |
- | + | <img src="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/images/0/09/CMU_leakyp.jpg", width="464", height="295"><br> | |
- | + | <img src="http://partsregistry.org/wiki/images/b/b4/CMU_leakyr.jpg", width="465", height="295"><br> | |
- | <br | + | |
+ | <br><strong>Figure 5: Leaky RNA (top panel) and protein (bottom panel) expression levels of our T7Lac promoters in BL21(DE3) cells.</strong> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | The leaky expression level of BBa_K921000 promoter is noticeably lower than the wild type promoter, which is consistent with the low RNA expression rates after induction of the promoter. However, the leaky expression levels of both BBa_K921001 and BBa_K921002 promoters are noticeably higher than the wild type promoter. Uninduced cells (without IPTG) were added to wells in a 96 well plate supplemented with either 200µM of DFHBI or 10µM of malachite green. Fluorescence intensities at the 3rd hour time point are shown for comparison between promoters.</p> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/d/de/Ts.png" height="300" width="380" align="center"/> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/9/9b/Tl.png" height="300" width="380" ><br> | ||
+ | <strong>Figure 6: Calculated values of transcription strength (left panel) and translation efficiency (right panel).</strong> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | Raw fluorescence values were normalized by OD600. Next, the normalized fluorescence values were fitted using differential equations that we developed to model our system. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <h1>Conclusion and Future Work</h1> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Based on our coupled RNA and protein biosensors, we have successfully characterized both translation and transcription rates of four T7Lac promoters. The coupled and non-invasive measurements of RNA and protein levels open doors to tremendous opportunities in studies of metabolic burden, gene regulation, and synthetic gene circuits. | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | In the near future, we plan to establish the kinetics of our biosensors more thoroughly using different bacterial strains and growth conditions. Furthermore, we plan to extend our study to different promoters and RBS, which could potentially generate new insight into the tight interplay between transcription and translation reactions. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
- | |||
<hr \> | <hr \> |
Latest revision as of 03:30, 27 October 2012
Dosage Curves of Spinach and FAP with Their Respective Dyes
To understand binding kinetics and equilibria of both Spinach and FAP with their respective fluorogens, we collected dosage curves of the biosensors by adding different concentrations of fluorogens to bacteria that express both Spinach and FAP. Based on the dosage curves, we calculated dissociation constants (KD) of each biosensor-fluorogen complex and saturating dose of each fluorogen.
Figure 1: Fluorescence intensities of Spinach-DFHBI at a fixed concentration of Spinach and different concentrations of added DFHBI .
The measured KD of the Spinach-DFHBI complex is 537nM [2]. Our measured KD also has a nanomolar affinity. We also measured the dosage curves at both 10th and 60th minute timepoint. We did not observe significant differences in the fluorescence levels, suggesting that DFHBI diffusion across bacterial membrane and its binding to Spinach occurs rapidly. Lines are drawn as guide of eyes. Please refer to the Protocols page for details of experiments.
Figure 2: Fluorescence intensities of FAP-MG at a fixed concentration of FAP and different concentrations of added MG .
The measured KD of the FAP-MG complex is close to the published value of 320nM [1]. A line is drawn as guide of eyes. Please refer to the Protocols page for details of experiments.
RNA and Protein Expression Levels of T7Lac Promoters
We aim to compare expression levels of three new T7Lac promoters with the wild-type T7Lac promoter, when either 3,5-difluoro-4-hydroxybenzylidene imidazolinone (DFHBI) or Malachite Green (MG) is added. DFHBI is a specific fluorogen that binds to Spinach and MG is a specific fluorogen that binds to FAP. Therefore, we assume that there is a positive correlation between fluorescence values and the amount of either RNA and proteins in bacteria.
Figure 3: Spinach fluorescence (reporter for RNA levels) over time.
Fluorescence values increase over time with all promoters. Mutant I (BBa_K921000) closely parallels the wild-type promoter in terms of magnitudes and expression rates of Spinach. Mutant II (BBa_K921001) exhibits significantly lower fluorescence levels than the wild-type promoter, indicating slower mRNA transcription rates. Fluorescence levels of mutant III (BBa_K921002) seems to be increasing at an accelerating rate as compared to the wild-type promoter and reach a significantly higher fluorescence level at the end of the experiment. All fluorescence values are normalized by the corresponding OD600 readings. Each error bar indicates one standard deviation of two replicates. Please refer to the Time-Lapse protocol in the Protocols page for the full experimental details.
Figure 4: FAP fluorescence (reporter for protein levels) over time .
Fluorescence values increase over time with all promoters. The fluorescence level of Mutant I (BBa_K921000) increases more rapidly than the other constructs, indicating that this promoter indirectly increases the translation rate of mRNA. Fluorescence levels of mutant II (BBa_K921001) closely parallels the wild type fluorescence levels, being only slightly lower in magnitude. Mutant III's fluorescence levels (BBa_K921002) increase very rapidly at first, but seems to be leveling off after one hour. This may indicate that bacteria have adapted host machinery to compensate for the metabolic burden. The metabolic burden could also result in larger OD600 and fluorescence fluctuations across replicates, which could give rise to large error bars. All fluorescence values are normalized by the corresponding OD600 readings. Each error bar indicates one standard error of two replicates. Please refer to the Time-Lapse protocol in the Protocols page for the full experimental details.
Figure 5: Leaky RNA (top panel) and protein (bottom panel) expression levels of our T7Lac promoters in BL21(DE3) cells.
The leaky expression level of BBa_K921000 promoter is noticeably lower than the wild type promoter, which is consistent with the low RNA expression rates after induction of the promoter. However, the leaky expression levels of both BBa_K921001 and BBa_K921002 promoters are noticeably higher than the wild type promoter. Uninduced cells (without IPTG) were added to wells in a 96 well plate supplemented with either 200µM of DFHBI or 10µM of malachite green. Fluorescence intensities at the 3rd hour time point are shown for comparison between promoters.
Figure 6: Calculated values of transcription strength (left panel) and translation efficiency (right panel).
Raw fluorescence values were normalized by OD600. Next, the normalized fluorescence values were fitted using differential equations that we developed to model our system.
Conclusion and Future Work
Based on our coupled RNA and protein biosensors, we have successfully characterized both translation and transcription rates of four T7Lac promoters. The coupled and non-invasive measurements of RNA and protein levels open doors to tremendous opportunities in studies of metabolic burden, gene regulation, and synthetic gene circuits.
In the near future, we plan to establish the kinetics of our biosensors more thoroughly using different bacterial strains and growth conditions. Furthermore, we plan to extend our study to different promoters and RBS, which could potentially generate new insight into the tight interplay between transcription and translation reactions.
[1] Szent-Gyorgyi, Christopher, Brigitte A. Schmidt, Yehuda Creeger, Gregory W. Fisher, Kelly L. Zakel, Sally Adler, James A J. Fitzpatrick, Carol A. Woolford, Qi Yan, Kalin V. Vasilev, Peter B. Berget, Marcel P. Bruchez, Jonathan W. Jarvik, and Alan Waggoner. "Fluorogen-activating Single-chain Antibodies for Imaging Cell Surface Proteins." Nature Biotechnology 26.2 (2007): 235-40. Print.
[2] Paige, J. S., K. Y. Wu, and S. R. Jaffrey. "RNA Mimics of Green Fluorescent Protein." Science 333.6042 (2011): 642-46. Print.