Team:Arizona State/Judging Criteria

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(One intermediate revision not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{:Team:Arizona_State/Template:Header}}
{{:Team:Arizona_State/Template:Header}}
-
"Ryan: Build out the Registry pages of the key parts (things the group is attempting to measure now)…Strep-beta gal constructs, Topo, Topo targets. Think ahead of time about how the data will be displayed"
+
Note from Dr. Haynes: Hi Ryan. The judging form is here [https://igem.org/2012_Judging_Form?id=891].<br>
 +
 
 +
Teams often create their own "Here's how we met the judging criteria" page because the Judging form isn't very personalized. Here is an example:
 +
https://2011.igem.org/Team:Harvard/Results/Accomplishments<br>
 +
 
 +
The ASU page should include accomplishments met for Bronze, Silver, and Gold, and accomplishments that are relevant to any of the Special Prizes (Best Human Practice Advance, Best Experimental Measurement, Best Model) if applicable.

Latest revision as of 18:08, 29 September 2012

Note from Dr. Haynes: Hi Ryan. The judging form is here [1].

Teams often create their own "Here's how we met the judging criteria" page because the Judging form isn't very personalized. Here is an example: https://2011.igem.org/Team:Harvard/Results/Accomplishments

The ASU page should include accomplishments met for Bronze, Silver, and Gold, and accomplishments that are relevant to any of the Special Prizes (Best Human Practice Advance, Best Experimental Measurement, Best Model) if applicable.