Team:Lyon-INSA/microbialControl
From 2012.igem.org
(36 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Lyon-INSA/homeCss}} | {{Lyon-INSA/homeCss}} | ||
{{Lyon-INSA/videos}} | {{Lyon-INSA/videos}} | ||
+ | {{Lyon-INSA/fancybox}} | ||
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:og="http://ogp.me/ns#" xmlns:fb="https://www.facebook.com/2008/fbml" > | <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:og="http://ogp.me/ns#" xmlns:fb="https://www.facebook.com/2008/fbml" > | ||
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> | <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> | ||
- | <script type="text/javascript" | + | <script type="text/javascript" src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.7.2/jquery.min.js"></script> |
- | <link | + | <link href="http://cdn.jsdelivr.net/fancybox/2.1.0/jquery.fancybox.css"/><script type="text/javascript" src="http://cdn.jsdelivr.net/fancybox/2.1.0/jquery.fancybox.js"></script> |
- | <script type="text/javascript" src="http:// | + | |
<script> | <script> | ||
$(document).ready(function(){ | $(document).ready(function(){ | ||
+ | $("#human").click(); | ||
$(".fancyable").fancybox(); | $(".fancyable").fancybox(); | ||
$("h2").click(function(){ | $("h2").click(function(){ | ||
Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
}); | }); | ||
</script> | </script> | ||
+ | <style> | ||
+ | .contenuTexte img{ | ||
+ | border:5px solid black; | ||
+ | border-radius:6px; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | </style> | ||
<head> | <head> | ||
</head> | </head> | ||
<body> | <body> | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
<div id="pageContent"> | <div id="pageContent"> | ||
- | |||
<h1>Applications</h1> | <h1>Applications</h1> | ||
<div class="introduction contenuTexte" style="margin:20px;display:inline-block;font-size:15px"> | <div class="introduction contenuTexte" style="margin:20px;display:inline-block;font-size:15px"> | ||
- | + | <br/><br/> | |
+ | <div><center><b><big>Click on the title to show/hide the text.</big></b></center></div><br/> | ||
<h2>The versatility of « Biofilm Killer »</h2> | <h2>The versatility of « Biofilm Killer »</h2> | ||
Line 55: | Line 50: | ||
<p>“Biofilm Killer” is designed to meet several industrial needs, because although almost every industry has problems dealing with biofilm development, cleaning biofilms does not mean the same in the different industries.</br> | <p>“Biofilm Killer” is designed to meet several industrial needs, because although almost every industry has problems dealing with biofilm development, cleaning biofilms does not mean the same in the different industries.</br> | ||
These applications can be briefly categorized in three different needs :</br> | These applications can be briefly categorized in three different needs :</br> | ||
- | <OL><li>The need for a clean, microorganism-free | + | <OL><li><i>The need for a clean, microorganism-free and chemical-free surface.</i> The industrial fields requiring this level of protection are basically those dealing with Human and Animal Health issues and in which the presence of contaminating microorganisms (whether good or bad) prevents certification or use of the instruments. This may as well concern the food industry because of health and hygiene related issues, although the use of a probiotic bacterium as a host for Biofilm Killer may be acceptable in certain conditions or countries.<br/> |
- | <br/><li>The need for a clean deleterious microorganism-free, with a protective bacterial barrier. Two main application domains are concerned. First, in farm animal breeding, protective biofilm barriers are already in use ( | + | <br/><li><i>The need for a clean deleterious microorganism-free, with a protective bacterial barrier.</i> Two main application domains are concerned. First, in farm animal breeding, protective biofilm barriers are already in use (e.g. poultry), and has application in other animal systems to prevent pathogen infection and excessive mortality. The second application domain is phytoprotection, e.g. biological control of plant pathogens in agriculture. Several microbial agents have been used successfully for years to control plant diseases. In many cases, the biocontrol agent is used to replace the local flora and create a protective barrier against the pathogens to prevent infection. <br/> |
- | <br/><li>The need for a clean, deleterious microorganism-free but biofilm colinization-protected surface. This may apply to certain areas in which long term protection would be useful, but | + | <br/><li><i>The need for a clean, deleterious microorganism-free but biofilm colinization-protected surface.</i> This may apply to certain areas in which long-term protection would be useful, but the protective biofilm presence is inadequate, e.g. food industry, cosmetics, and other soft-chemical industries. This also apply to refrigeration systems and air-conditioning units. |
</OL> <p> | </OL> <p> | ||
- | <br/><br/>The beauty of Bioflm Killer resides in its versatile design that | + | <br/><br/>The beauty of Bioflm Killer resides in its versatile design that enables the user to choose the best combination of action for his needs. The 3 modules of Biofilm Killer are independent, and can be used efficiently in any combination with the use of non toxic inducers in very limited quantities.<br/> |
- | Basically | + | Basically, given the above classification of needs <strong> the following options are suggested.</strong><br/> |
- | </br><ul><li>Health and food industry: Use of only Module 1 (Kill and | + | </br> |
- | < | + | <ul> |
- | < | + | <li><strong>Health and food industry:</strong> Use of only Module 1 (Kill and Scatter) to facilitate complete removal of the biofilm and recover a surface 100% free of bacteria after a regular cleaning procedure step.</li> |
+ | <li><strong>Poultry and Animal raising, Oil industry :</strong> Use of Module 1 (Kill and Scatter) to facilitate the complete removal of the biofilm and induction of Module 3 (STICK) to establish a protective <i>B. subtilis</i> biofilm to create a barrier flora in the intestine of the animal or on the surface of tubing to achieve long-term protection against pathogen recolonization or corrosion.</li> | ||
+ | <li><strong>Food industry, Soft chemical industry or the treatment of refrigeration units, air-conditionning modules :</strong> In other applications where the establishement of a bacterial biofilm cannot be envisionned, but long-term protection against microbial recolonization needs to be achieved, the user can use Module 1 (Kill and Scatter) to remove the biofilm in combination with Module 2 (COAT) to generate a protective, peptide-based protective coating of the surface to protect.</li><br/></ul> | ||
- | To make Biofilm Killer compatible for most industrial applications, we further propose to introduce our genetic constructions in a NON-sporulant <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> strain to prevent the release and survival of this strain in the environment. (See safety page)<br/><br/> | + | To make Biofilm Killer compatible for most industrial applications, we further propose to introduce our genetic constructions in a NON-sporulant <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> strain to prevent the release and survival of this strain in the environment. (<a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Lyon-INSA/safety"> See safety page</a>)<br/><br/> |
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 74: | Line 71: | ||
<div class="wrapper"> | <div class="wrapper"> | ||
+ | <div class="contenuTexte"> | ||
- | <div class="contenuTexte" style="width: | + | <div class="contenuTexte" style="width:70%;display:inline-block;"> |
- | <p>Oil industry faces | + | <p>The Oil industry faces important and costly difficulties due to biofilm-related issues. These include, but are not limited to, pipeline and metallic structure corrosion, porosity clogging in the rock or the tubing, microbial souring, petroleum spoilage during storage. The main consequences of microbial presence at the global scale are several : <br/> A reduced quality of the final product (microbial alteration), an increase in treatment costs (souring), the reduction of efficient production (souring, microbial alteration, clogging). Biofilm formation is involved in the corrosion of the metallic structures, including the oil-platform, but most importantly the pipelines and tubing. <br/><br/> |
Biofilm-induced alteration will affect the structure, resulting in two effects : <br/> | Biofilm-induced alteration will affect the structure, resulting in two effects : <br/> | ||
- | The first one is the clogging of the tubing, which much like cholesterol deposits in our arteries, will reduce the available circulating space, reducing the flux of gas or oil that can be transported through the pipe. Even small amounts of biofilm can negatively | + | <ul> |
+ | <li>The first one is the clogging of the tubing, which much like cholesterol deposits in our arteries, will reduce the available circulating space, reducing the flux of gas or oil that can be transported through the pipe. Even small amounts of biofilm can negatively | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/e/e6/Flow.png" width=" | + | <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/e/e6/Flow.png" class="fancyable"> |
- | margin-left: | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/e/e6/Flow.png" width="215px" style=" |
- | + | margin-left:15px;margin-top:20px;vertical-align:top;"/> | |
+ | </a> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | <p>affect flow of hydrocarbons, as can be seen on the figure on the right showing the results of an an experiment performed on gas fluxes in presence or absence of only 8% of biofilm coverage. As a consequence of biofilm formation, we can see that about 50% of the gas flux is lost (<a href="http://www.slb.com/%7E/media/Files/resources/oilfield_review/ors12/sum12/1_microbes.pdf">from Z. Augustinovic <i>et al.</i></a>).</li> | ||
- | <div class="contenuTexte" style=" | + | |
- | < | + | <div class="contenuTexte" style="display:inline-block;"> |
+ | <li>The second is the anaerobic corrosion of metal from the structure, which will be instrumental in establishing the biofilm and induce clogging, but will also fragilize the structures.</li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
- | < | + | <center> |
- | + | <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/b/be/Tube-b.png" class="fancyable"> | |
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/b/be/Tube-b.png" width="300px" style=" | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/b/be/Tube-b.png" width="300px" style=" |
- | margin-left:20px;margin-top:20px;vertical-align:top;"/> | + | margin-left:20px;margin-top:20px;vertical-align:top;"/></a></center><br/> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<p>In the above example of biofilm-induced pipe corrosion, while a significant part of the corrosion occurs on the outside of the pipe, it is estimated that more than half of the corrosion is due to microbial growth on the inner surface of pipelines. Internal and external metallic corrosion contributes significantly to the risk of oil and gas pipeline deterioration and failure (see below), causes well and reservoir souring and plugging, and results in billions of dollars in annual costs to the oil and gas industry. | <p>In the above example of biofilm-induced pipe corrosion, while a significant part of the corrosion occurs on the outside of the pipe, it is estimated that more than half of the corrosion is due to microbial growth on the inner surface of pipelines. Internal and external metallic corrosion contributes significantly to the risk of oil and gas pipeline deterioration and failure (see below), causes well and reservoir souring and plugging, and results in billions of dollars in annual costs to the oil and gas industry. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
- | < | + | |
- | + | ||
- | <p>Impact of biofilms and microbiologically influenced corrosion in oilfield. Siri | + | <div class="contenuTexte" style="display:inline-block;width:60%"> |
+ | <p>Impact of biofilms and microbiologically influenced corrosion in oilfield. Siri platform (center) is located in the North sea and flanked by the smaller Cecilie and Nini satellite platforms. Seafloor lines between the 3 structures and wells carry oil and gas (gas for lift and injection water for pressure support). INSET: in 2007, water injection line ruptured. Subsequent investigation revealed a mixture of iron sulfide and other corrosion by-products plus microbes and polysaccharide slime at the rupture site. These deposits enable sulfate-reducing procaryotes and other troublesome microbes to grow protected from biocides. (Augustinovic <i>et al.</i>, Microbes- Oilfield Enemies or Allies? Oilfield Review, Summer 2012, Schlumberger)</p> | ||
<br/><br/> | <br/><br/> | ||
- | Most importantly, failure on the production line can lead to dramatic oil or gas spills that lead to unprecedented environmental risks and damages. Such failure has recently happened on the Elgin Field, located in the North Sea | + | </div> |
+ | |||
+ | <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/e/e2/Oilindus.gif" class="fancyable"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/e/e2/Oilindus.gif" width="30%" style=" | ||
+ | margin-left:20px;margin-top:0px;vertical-align:top;"/> | ||
+ | </a> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/c/cb/Industrya.png" class="fancyable"> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/c/cb/Industrya.png" width="300px" style="margin:20px;vertical-align:top;margin-top:40px; | ||
+ | "/> | ||
+ | </a> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="contenuTexte" style="display:inline-block;width:60%;"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>Most importantly, failure on the production line can lead to dramatic oil or gas spills that lead to unprecedented environmental risks and damages. Such failure has recently happened on the Elgin Field, located in the North Sea around 240 kilometers off Aberdeen (Scotland), on a gas field exploited by the French petroleum company Total. The failure of the production line lead to a gas spill estimated to around 1.8 million Euros loss per day for the company. Due to the location of the failure at the sea floor, it took several months for the leak to be stopped. In addition to the cost to the company, a maritime exclusion zone had to be created which perturbated maritime traffic, and around 20 tons of gas were released in the atmosphere daily. The previous year, in the same region an oleoduc exploited by the Royal Dutch Shell had ruptured, also leading to oil spill in the North sea. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
- | |||
<p>The problems with oil or gas production pipe is two folds : they are expected to be in place for decades and they often are difficult to access. Thus cleaning and locating biofilm is no simple task. Biofilms can be in dead zone which make them impossible to clean with mechanical process.</p> | <p>The problems with oil or gas production pipe is two folds : they are expected to be in place for decades and they often are difficult to access. Thus cleaning and locating biofilm is no simple task. Biofilms can be in dead zone which make them impossible to clean with mechanical process.</p> | ||
</div><br/> | </div><br/> | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | </div> | |
- | + | ||
- | </ | + | |
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 121: | Line 136: | ||
- | <p>Our Biofilm Killer construction in <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> 168 is designed to help address both | + | <p>Our Biofilm Killer construction in <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> 168 is designed to help address both ease of delivery of the cleaner as well as induce a long-term protection on the inner surface of the tubing. Biofilm Killer can be applied following the procedure which is already accepted in the industrial processes where Clean In Place procedures are performed. In this protocole, the process features 3 tanks usually filled with sodium carbonate, nitric acid and sodium hypochlorite. These three chemicals are used in sequence to remove the biofilm by inducing an alkaline and acidic treatment to destabilize the biofilm and a sterilizing treatment with hypochlorite. Refinements to the CIP procedure include the use of the use of specific enzymes targeting the biofilm, e.g. dispersin (Realco).<br/> |
<P style="text-align:center"><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/1/11/CIP.JPG" class="fancyable"> | <P style="text-align:center"><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/1/11/CIP.JPG" class="fancyable"> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/1/11/CIP.JPG" width="60% | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/1/11/CIP.JPG" width="60%" /> |
</a></P> | </a></P> | ||
- | <p><br>In order to specifically remove biofilms and to lower | + | <p><br>In order to specifically remove biofilms and to lower amounts of toxic chemicals used, we propose to fill one of the CIP bulk with “Biofilm Killer”. “Biofilm Killer” will be targeted to the place to clean by the flow of water delivered in the pipe. It will swim inside the biofilm and produce and deliver <i>in situ</i> inside the biofilm both the biocide and the scattering agent. “Biofilm Killer” will have an action on both the target strain to kill it and on the exopolysaccharide matrix of the biofilm to dissolve it. Our physiological tests show that after 1 hour, there are already significant effects of lysostaphin and dispersin. The impressive effect of the combined action of the two proteins on a staphylococcal biofilm is shown <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/5/5a/S.aureus_lyso%2Bdisp.jpg">HERE</a>. To maximise the dispersing effect of the construction, we recommend a 5-hour duration treatment with “Biofilm Killer”. The scattered and killed biofilm will then be eliminated by subsequent acid, caustic and sanitizing treatment as in classical CIP, if no recolonization is required. A significant decrease in the needed amount of these chemical is expected. Alternatively, “Biofilm Killer” will be induced to colonize the surface or produce surfactin in order to form a long-term protection against deleterious recolonization of the surface. |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
- | Preparation and storage of Biofilm Killer is not an issue since the very same organism is already produced and stored for poultry breeding or crop plant phytoprotection. In our case, it will be | + | Preparation and storage of Biofilm Killer is not an issue since the very same organism is already produced and stored for poultry breeding or crop plant phytoprotection. In our case, it will be more convenient to prepare Biofilm Killer as a lyophilisate since it can be stored for months until use. |
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 140: | Line 155: | ||
<div class="contenuTexte" style="width:95%;display:inline-block;"> | <div class="contenuTexte" style="width:95%;display:inline-block;"> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
- | The oil patch is a worldwide industry and moreover a multi-billion | + | The oil patch is a worldwide industry and moreover a multi-billion dollar activity. It has ramifications worldwide. One can find at least one step of the production or the distribution line in every country. From the exploration to the distribution or the transformation in different products and to the consumer, this system is quite linear and can be schematized as follows : <br/> |
- | < | + | <p style="text-align:center"><a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/6/65/Image_analyse_oil_patch.jpg" class="fancyable"> |
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/ | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/6/65/Image_analyse_oil_patch.jpg" width="80%" /> |
- | </a></ | + | </a></p><br/> |
This work flow can be divided in two types of activities : | This work flow can be divided in two types of activities : | ||
- | <br/><ul><li>The upstream operations concerns the production <i>sensu largo</i> of the resource itself. It includes all the operations | + | <br/><ul><li>The upstream operations concerns the production <i>sensu largo</i> of the resource itself. It includes all the operations needed for the exploration, the drilling, and the extraction necessary for the crude oil and the natural gas production. </li> |
- | < | + | <li>The downstream operations deal with the transport and transformation of the product itself. It includes transporting the oil or gas by pipes or tankers, the refining, the retailing and the consuming, until it finally reaches the consumer, which can be the car owner at the gas station or a company using petroleum-derived products.</li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
- | <br/>The gas and oil patch is the biggest industry in the world. It is dominated by 5 or 6, extremely big companies called “Supermajors” which rule the system and have control over it: among them are BP, Total or Shell. Despite their gigantic size, these companies control only | + | <br/>The gas and oil patch is the biggest industry in the world. The daily production of oil is around 13 billion liters. It is dominated by 5 or 6, extremely big companies called “Supermajors” which rule the system and have control over it: among them are BP, Total or Shell. Despite their gigantic size, these companies control only around 5% of the oil reserves worldwide. The large majority of the reserve is controlled by local and national companies such as the Saudi Aramco, the iranian National Iranian Oil Company or the koweti Kuwait Petroleum Corporation. |
<br/><br/> | <br/><br/> | ||
- | + | Oil or gas production involves millions of kilometers of tubing at the production site or for transportation, tanks and tankers for storage and oversea transportation. Moreover, oil extraction often involves the use of large amounts of water, which create a very favorable environments for microbes to grow in. This oil and water mixture travels through the pipe until it is finally separated at the surface. Thus, oil production represents a vast number of tanks and kilometers of pipes in which microbial biofilms are likely to grow and induce corrosion, and which need to be cleaned!<br/> | |
- | + | <br/> | |
- | <br/><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/b/b6/Logo_amst%C3%A9rix_page_accueil.png" width="5%" />< | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/b/b6/Logo_amst%C3%A9rix_page_accueil.png" width="5%" style="float:left;" /><div style="width:800px;float:right;margin-right:10px">This logo means that our solution “Biofilm Killer” can be used in this part of the oil process to remove bacteria and clean pipes or tanks and save the company from much bigger issues, such as a hole in a pipe letting gas or oil flow out in the deep of an ocean, meaning loss of millions dollars.</div><br/> |
<p> | <p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
- | + | </div> | |
Latest revision as of 12:01, 8 June 2013
Applications
The versatility of « Biofilm Killer »
“Biofilm Killer” is designed to meet several industrial needs, because although almost every industry has problems dealing with biofilm development, cleaning biofilms does not mean the same in the different industries. These applications can be briefly categorized in three different needs :
- The need for a clean, microorganism-free and chemical-free surface. The industrial fields requiring this level of protection are basically those dealing with Human and Animal Health issues and in which the presence of contaminating microorganisms (whether good or bad) prevents certification or use of the instruments. This may as well concern the food industry because of health and hygiene related issues, although the use of a probiotic bacterium as a host for Biofilm Killer may be acceptable in certain conditions or countries.
- The need for a clean deleterious microorganism-free, with a protective bacterial barrier. Two main application domains are concerned. First, in farm animal breeding, protective biofilm barriers are already in use (e.g. poultry), and has application in other animal systems to prevent pathogen infection and excessive mortality. The second application domain is phytoprotection, e.g. biological control of plant pathogens in agriculture. Several microbial agents have been used successfully for years to control plant diseases. In many cases, the biocontrol agent is used to replace the local flora and create a protective barrier against the pathogens to prevent infection.
- The need for a clean, deleterious microorganism-free but biofilm colinization-protected surface. This may apply to certain areas in which long-term protection would be useful, but the protective biofilm presence is inadequate, e.g. food industry, cosmetics, and other soft-chemical industries. This also apply to refrigeration systems and air-conditioning units.
The beauty of Bioflm Killer resides in its versatile design that enables the user to choose the best combination of action for his needs. The 3 modules of Biofilm Killer are independent, and can be used efficiently in any combination with the use of non toxic inducers in very limited quantities.
Basically, given the above classification of needs the following options are suggested.
- Health and food industry: Use of only Module 1 (Kill and Scatter) to facilitate complete removal of the biofilm and recover a surface 100% free of bacteria after a regular cleaning procedure step.
- Poultry and Animal raising, Oil industry : Use of Module 1 (Kill and Scatter) to facilitate the complete removal of the biofilm and induction of Module 3 (STICK) to establish a protective B. subtilis biofilm to create a barrier flora in the intestine of the animal or on the surface of tubing to achieve long-term protection against pathogen recolonization or corrosion.
- Food industry, Soft chemical industry or the treatment of refrigeration units, air-conditionning modules : In other applications where the establishement of a bacterial biofilm cannot be envisionned, but long-term protection against microbial recolonization needs to be achieved, the user can use Module 1 (Kill and Scatter) to remove the biofilm in combination with Module 2 (COAT) to generate a protective, peptide-based protective coating of the surface to protect.
Focus on Oil Industry
The Oil industry faces important and costly difficulties due to biofilm-related issues. These include, but are not limited to, pipeline and metallic structure corrosion, porosity clogging in the rock or the tubing, microbial souring, petroleum spoilage during storage. The main consequences of microbial presence at the global scale are several :
A reduced quality of the final product (microbial alteration), an increase in treatment costs (souring), the reduction of efficient production (souring, microbial alteration, clogging). Biofilm formation is involved in the corrosion of the metallic structures, including the oil-platform, but most importantly the pipelines and tubing.
Biofilm-induced alteration will affect the structure, resulting in two effects :
- The first one is the clogging of the tubing, which much like cholesterol deposits in our arteries, will reduce the available circulating space, reducing the flux of gas or oil that can be transported through the pipe. Even small amounts of biofilm can negatively
affect flow of hydrocarbons, as can be seen on the figure on the right showing the results of an an experiment performed on gas fluxes in presence or absence of only 8% of biofilm coverage. As a consequence of biofilm formation, we can see that about 50% of the gas flux is lost (from Z. Augustinovic et al.).
In the above example of biofilm-induced pipe corrosion, while a significant part of the corrosion occurs on the outside of the pipe, it is estimated that more than half of the corrosion is due to microbial growth on the inner surface of pipelines. Internal and external metallic corrosion contributes significantly to the risk of oil and gas pipeline deterioration and failure (see below), causes well and reservoir souring and plugging, and results in billions of dollars in annual costs to the oil and gas industry.
Impact of biofilms and microbiologically influenced corrosion in oilfield. Siri platform (center) is located in the North sea and flanked by the smaller Cecilie and Nini satellite platforms. Seafloor lines between the 3 structures and wells carry oil and gas (gas for lift and injection water for pressure support). INSET: in 2007, water injection line ruptured. Subsequent investigation revealed a mixture of iron sulfide and other corrosion by-products plus microbes and polysaccharide slime at the rupture site. These deposits enable sulfate-reducing procaryotes and other troublesome microbes to grow protected from biocides. (Augustinovic et al., Microbes- Oilfield Enemies or Allies? Oilfield Review, Summer 2012, Schlumberger)
Most importantly, failure on the production line can lead to dramatic oil or gas spills that lead to unprecedented environmental risks and damages. Such failure has recently happened on the Elgin Field, located in the North Sea around 240 kilometers off Aberdeen (Scotland), on a gas field exploited by the French petroleum company Total. The failure of the production line lead to a gas spill estimated to around 1.8 million Euros loss per day for the company. Due to the location of the failure at the sea floor, it took several months for the leak to be stopped. In addition to the cost to the company, a maritime exclusion zone had to be created which perturbated maritime traffic, and around 20 tons of gas were released in the atmosphere daily. The previous year, in the same region an oleoduc exploited by the Royal Dutch Shell had ruptured, also leading to oil spill in the North sea.
The problems with oil or gas production pipe is two folds : they are expected to be in place for decades and they often are difficult to access. Thus cleaning and locating biofilm is no simple task. Biofilms can be in dead zone which make them impossible to clean with mechanical process.
« Biofilm Killer »: a practical manual
Our Biofilm Killer construction in Bacillus subtilis 168 is designed to help address both ease of delivery of the cleaner as well as induce a long-term protection on the inner surface of the tubing. Biofilm Killer can be applied following the procedure which is already accepted in the industrial processes where Clean In Place procedures are performed. In this protocole, the process features 3 tanks usually filled with sodium carbonate, nitric acid and sodium hypochlorite. These three chemicals are used in sequence to remove the biofilm by inducing an alkaline and acidic treatment to destabilize the biofilm and a sterilizing treatment with hypochlorite. Refinements to the CIP procedure include the use of the use of specific enzymes targeting the biofilm, e.g. dispersin (Realco).
In order to specifically remove biofilms and to lower amounts of toxic chemicals used, we propose to fill one of the CIP bulk with “Biofilm Killer”. “Biofilm Killer” will be targeted to the place to clean by the flow of water delivered in the pipe. It will swim inside the biofilm and produce and deliver in situ inside the biofilm both the biocide and the scattering agent. “Biofilm Killer” will have an action on both the target strain to kill it and on the exopolysaccharide matrix of the biofilm to dissolve it. Our physiological tests show that after 1 hour, there are already significant effects of lysostaphin and dispersin. The impressive effect of the combined action of the two proteins on a staphylococcal biofilm is shown HERE. To maximise the dispersing effect of the construction, we recommend a 5-hour duration treatment with “Biofilm Killer”. The scattered and killed biofilm will then be eliminated by subsequent acid, caustic and sanitizing treatment as in classical CIP, if no recolonization is required. A significant decrease in the needed amount of these chemical is expected. Alternatively, “Biofilm Killer” will be induced to colonize the surface or produce surfactin in order to form a long-term protection against deleterious recolonization of the surface.
Preparation and storage of Biofilm Killer is not an issue since the very same organism is already produced and stored for poultry breeding or crop plant phytoprotection. In our case, it will be more convenient to prepare Biofilm Killer as a lyophilisate since it can be stored for months until use.
Biofilm Killer and the Oil Patch Economy
The oil patch is a worldwide industry and moreover a multi-billion dollar activity. It has ramifications worldwide. One can find at least one step of the production or the distribution line in every country. From the exploration to the distribution or the transformation in different products and to the consumer, this system is quite linear and can be schematized as follows :
This work flow can be divided in two types of activities :
- The upstream operations concerns the production sensu largo of the resource itself. It includes all the operations needed for the exploration, the drilling, and the extraction necessary for the crude oil and the natural gas production.
- The downstream operations deal with the transport and transformation of the product itself. It includes transporting the oil or gas by pipes or tankers, the refining, the retailing and the consuming, until it finally reaches the consumer, which can be the car owner at the gas station or a company using petroleum-derived products.
The gas and oil patch is the biggest industry in the world. The daily production of oil is around 13 billion liters. It is dominated by 5 or 6, extremely big companies called “Supermajors” which rule the system and have control over it: among them are BP, Total or Shell. Despite their gigantic size, these companies control only around 5% of the oil reserves worldwide. The large majority of the reserve is controlled by local and national companies such as the Saudi Aramco, the iranian National Iranian Oil Company or the koweti Kuwait Petroleum Corporation.
Oil or gas production involves millions of kilometers of tubing at the production site or for transportation, tanks and tankers for storage and oversea transportation. Moreover, oil extraction often involves the use of large amounts of water, which create a very favorable environments for microbes to grow in. This oil and water mixture travels through the pipe until it is finally separated at the surface. Thus, oil production represents a vast number of tanks and kilometers of pipes in which microbial biofilms are likely to grow and induce corrosion, and which need to be cleaned!