Team:Hong Kong-CUHK/PROJECT RESULTS

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(5 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
       <p>&nbsp;</p>
       <p>&nbsp;</p>
       <p class="aloveofthunder" style="line-height:normal; margin-bottom:35px">RESULTS</p>
       <p class="aloveofthunder" style="line-height:normal; margin-bottom:35px">RESULTS</p>
-
       <p><strong>Data for Our Favourite New Parts</strong></p>
+
       <p><strong>I. Biobrick Construction Strategy</strong><br />
-
       <ol>
+
The Sensory Rhodopsin system works in <i>E. coli</i> by fusing SR and Htr with a flexible linker and joint the HtrII membrane-proximal cytoplasmic fragment with the cytoplasmic domain (Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein (MCP) signalling domain) of the eubacterial chemotaxis receptor [1]. The fusion protein in BBa_K317028 and BBa_K317003 used the Tar gene from <i>Synechocystis typhimurium</i>, have their construct design based on [2]. The previous study made three different junction constructs (P, G, M) based on studies of dimerization, yet no accurate tool was used for domain determination. Therefore, we made the following improvements.</p>
-
         <li><a href="http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K786001">Main Page</a> – <strong> Promoter efficiency for  BBa_K786001. BBa_K786002, BBa_K786003 </strong></li>
+
       <p><ol><li>Tar gene from <i>E. coli</i> K12 strain was used instead of that of <i>S. typhimurium</i>, as we believe <i>E. coli</i> can express and function more properly with its native genes and proteins.</li>
-
      </ol>
+
         <li>We designed the construct by using an accurate protein domain determining tool [3], the whole <em><i>E. coli</i> </em>Tar protein consist of three domains- Tar ligand binding domain (amino acid sequence 1-175), the HAMP domain (amino acid sequence 194-263) and the Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein (MCP) signalling domain (amino acid sequence 264-553). As only the cytoplasmic domain is needed, the exact Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein (MCP) signalling domain (amino acid sequence 264-553 of EcTar) was cut and fused with membrane-proximal cytoplasmic fragment part of HtrII (amino acid sequence 1- 133).</li>
 +
        <li>Restriction sites of HindIII and BamHI were added before and after the SRII gene respectively for enabling switching the sensory rhodopsin portion of the fusion protein. A series of mutant sensory rhodopsins was identified which covers a large variation of absorbing spectrum [2]. These two restriction sites allow further switching of the sensing unit, so the light sensing system can be tuned for sensing different kinds of light source.</li></ol>
 +
</p>
 +
      <p>The improvements made were successful as the function (sense light for cell movement) of the above fusion proteins were tested with positive results shown below.      </p>
 +
      <p><strong>II. Method of measurement</strong><br />
 +
      According to previous studies on positive phototactic microorganisms, colonies of microorganisms should spread towards the light source. [4]  </p>
 +
      <p>As our cells receive stimulation of blue light from all directions instead of unidirectional as what the paper used, therefore, they spread out in all directions after 12 h exposure of light. Average diameters were measured by an electronic ruler with precision of 0.01 mm. Data of diameters from at least three independent clones were collected. Paired <i>t</i>-test was used to analyze the collected data. A significant difference was observed between the plates (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). </p>
 +
<p><strong>1. </strong><a href="http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K786001">Main Page</a> – <strong> Promoter efficiency for  BBa_K786001. BBa_K786002, BBa_K786003 </strong></p>
       <p>To test the expression of sensory rhodopsin triggered by constitutive promoter BBa_J23100 to sense light, </p>
       <p>To test the expression of sensory rhodopsin triggered by constitutive promoter BBa_J23100 to sense light, </p>
       <p align="center"><center><img width="200" height="66" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/1/1f/R1.png" /></center></p>
       <p align="center"><center><img width="200" height="66" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/1/1f/R1.png" /></center></p>
       <p> </p>
       <p> </p>
-
       <p>we need to test the effect conferred by different <em>E. coli</em> strains to expression of red fluorescence protein reporter downstream of BBa_J23100 to different bacterial strains. It allows us to select the suitable strain(s) for this constitutive promoter for expressing sensory rhodopsin.</p>
+
       <p>we need to test the effect conferred by different <em><i>E. coli</i></em> strains to expression of red fluorescence protein reporter downstream of BBa_J23100 to different bacterial strains. It allows us to select the suitable strain(s) for this constitutive promoter for expressing sensory rhodopsin.</p>
       <p>Florescence plate reader was used to take readings of fluorescence emission of 635nm and absorbance at 600nm (OD600) between time intervals of 12 hours on each strain. The measurements were started when the cultures reached a OD600 of around 0.4 that represents log phase of active proliferation. Growth curve and fluorescence intensity against time were plotted to compare cell growth and protein expression on different strains.</p>
       <p>Florescence plate reader was used to take readings of fluorescence emission of 635nm and absorbance at 600nm (OD600) between time intervals of 12 hours on each strain. The measurements were started when the cultures reached a OD600 of around 0.4 that represents log phase of active proliferation. Growth curve and fluorescence intensity against time were plotted to compare cell growth and protein expression on different strains.</p>
       <p>Three independent experiments were conducted. No significant difference was observed on the growth curves, indicating a similar growth rate among the three bacterial strains with BBa_J23100 transformed. It implies the promoter does not cause cell toxicity or growth inhibition of these three bacterial strains.</p>
       <p>Three independent experiments were conducted. No significant difference was observed on the growth curves, indicating a similar growth rate among the three bacterial strains with BBa_J23100 transformed. It implies the promoter does not cause cell toxicity or growth inhibition of these three bacterial strains.</p>
Line 23: Line 30:
       <p><center><img border="0" width="417" height="330" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/f/f5/R3.png" alt="Description: ::Desktop:iGEM 2012:Characterization on Bba_J23100-fluoresence.jpg" /></center></p>
       <p><center><img border="0" width="417" height="330" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/f/f5/R3.png" alt="Description: ::Desktop:iGEM 2012:Characterization on Bba_J23100-fluoresence.jpg" /></center></p>
       <p>&nbsp;</p>
       <p>&nbsp;</p>
-
       <p>To conclude, DH5α is not an optimal strain to utilize promoter BBa_J23100, while TOP10 and BL 21(DE3) can effectively express the reporter. Therefore, in downstream application of our light sensing biobricks (BBa_K786001, BBa_K786002, BBa_K786003) in which BBa_J23100 was used, DH5α are not used.</p>
+
       <p>To conclude, DH5α is not an optimal strain to utilize promoter BBa_J23100, while TOP10 and BL 21(DE3) can effectively express the reporter. Therefore, in downstream application of our light sensing biobricks (BBa_K786001, BBa_K786002, BBa_K786003) in which BBa_J23100 was used, DH5α are not used.     </p>
-
       <p>&nbsp;</p>
+
       <p>2. <a href="http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K786002">Main Page</a> – <strong>Positive Phototactic Construct for Blue Light Detection </strong><strong>(BBa_K786002)</strong></p>
-
      <ol>
+
-
        <li><a href="http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K786002">Main Page</a> – <strong>Positive Phototactic Construct for Blue Light Detection </strong><strong>(BBa_K786002)</strong></li>
+
-
      </ol>
+
       <p>To evaluate whether our biobrick BBa_K786002 causes cell movement under blue light exposure, we transferred transformed bacteria on soft agar and observe if it moves under blue light. It is known that bacteria can swim on soft agar.</p>
       <p>To evaluate whether our biobrick BBa_K786002 causes cell movement under blue light exposure, we transferred transformed bacteria on soft agar and observe if it moves under blue light. It is known that bacteria can swim on soft agar.</p>
       <p>Soft agar (0.4%) plate was prepared. Cell cultures transformed with BBa_K786002 (6, 12 and 25 µl) with OD600 ~2 were pipetted on each semi-agar plate. Duplicate aliquots were done on each plate and four plates were made. Two of the plates were placed in dark and two were placed under blue LED light of 200 mW (with spectra covering from 430-480 nm).<br />
       <p>Soft agar (0.4%) plate was prepared. Cell cultures transformed with BBa_K786002 (6, 12 and 25 µl) with OD600 ~2 were pipetted on each semi-agar plate. Duplicate aliquots were done on each plate and four plates were made. Two of the plates were placed in dark and two were placed under blue LED light of 200 mW (with spectra covering from 430-480 nm).<br />
         <center><img border="0" width="300" height="352" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/b/bf/R4.png" alt="Description: C:\Users\Ricky\Documents\igem\rhodopsin\result\blue light (1).PNG" /></center><br />
         <center><img border="0" width="300" height="352" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/b/bf/R4.png" alt="Description: C:\Users\Ricky\Documents\igem\rhodopsin\result\blue light (1).PNG" /></center><br />
-
         We placed the plates overnight for 12 h at 25oC and compared the diameter differences between the plates with or without blue light exposure. We used paired <em>t</em>-test for analyzing the collected data. A significant difference was observed between the plates (*** indicates <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The average diameters of three clones exposed under blue light are bigger than the counterparts in dark. Blue light triggers a change in diameter of 180 ± 40 %, while there is no significant change in diameter for those without BBa_K786002. When we put the bacteria transformed with BBa_K786002 under light, the blue light stimulates SRII and switches on the hisitine kinase CheY by decreasing the phosphorylation level of CheY (CheY-P). Therefore, a prolonged running period in bacteria is resulted as CheY-P causes cell tumbling, a random movement. When the cell tumbles and faces towards light, SRII is stimulated again. The process repeats and the cell will eventually travel towards blue light.<br />
+
         We placed the plates overnight for 12 h at 25oC and compared the diameter differences between the plates with or without blue light exposure. We used paired <em>t</em>-test for analyzing the collected data. A significant difference was observed between the plates (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The average diameters of three clones exposed under blue light are bigger than the counterparts in dark. Blue light triggers a change in diameter of 180 ± 40 %, while there is no significant change in diameter for those without BBa_K786002. When we put the bacteria transformed with BBa_K786002 under light, the blue light stimulates SRII and switches on the hisitine kinase CheY by decreasing the phosphorylation level of CheY (CheY-P). Therefore, a prolonged running period in bacteria is resulted as CheY-P causes cell tumbling, a random movement. When the cell tumbles and faces towards light, SRII is stimulated again. The process repeats and the cell will eventually travel towards blue light.<br />
-
  <center> <img border="0" width="450" height="338" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/f/fe/R5.png" alt="Description: ::Desktop:iGEM 2012:Protein B with light on semi-agar.jpg" /></center></p>
+
  <center> <img border="0" width="450" height="338" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/f/fe/R5.png" alt="Description: ::Desktop:iGEM 2012:Protein B with light on semi-agar.jpg" /></center>
-
      <ol>
+
3.
-
        <li><a href="http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K786003">Main Page</a> – <strong>Phototactic Construct for Orange Light Detection</strong><strong>&nbsp;</strong><strong>(</strong><strong>BBa_K786003</strong><strong>)</strong></li>
+
<a href="http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K786003">Main Page</a> – <strong>Phototactic Construct for Orange Light Detection</strong><strong>&nbsp;</strong><strong>(</strong><strong>BBa_K786003</strong><strong>)</strong></p>
-
      </ol>
+
       <p>See our <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Hong_Kong-CUHK/PROJECT_MODELING"><strong>modeling</strong></a> page for more details.</p>
       <p>See our <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Hong_Kong-CUHK/PROJECT_MODELING"><strong>modeling</strong></a> page for more details.</p>
-
        
+
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
4. </strong>Cell sorting by<strong> Phototactic Construct for Orange Light Detection (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K786003">BBa_K786003</a>)</strong> and<strong> Positive Phototactic Construct for Blue Light Detection (<a href="http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K786002">BBa_K786002</a>)</strong></strong>
 +
</p>
 +
       <p>To evaluate the cell sorting function of our biobricks BBa_K786002 and BBa_K786003, we transferred bacteria transformed with BBa_K786002 (sensitive to blue light) and BBa_K786003 (sensitive to orange light) on soft agar and observed their movements under blue and orange light source from different directions.</p>
 +
      <p>Soft agar (0.4%) plate was prepared. A mix of two individual Ccell cultures transformed with BBa_K786002 and BBa_K786003 (12 µl each) respectively with OD600 ~2 were pipetted onto two semi-agar plates. One of the plates was placed in dark while another one was exposed to blue and orange light in opposite direction. The plates were placed overnight for 12 h at 25oC.</p>
 +
 
 +
<p><center><img border="0" width="417" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/3/30/R6.jpg"  /></center></p>
 +
 
 +
<p>The bacteria colony separated towards opposite directions after exposed to blue and orange light, while the colony left in the dark has no significant change in shape, suggesting the bacteria sensitive to blue light and orange light have migrated towards to corresponding light sources respectively.</p>
 +
 
 +
 
     <!-- InstanceEndEditable --></td>
     <!-- InstanceEndEditable --></td>

Latest revision as of 14:11, 26 October 2012



 

 

Check out our FACEBOOK page!

 

RESULTS

I. Biobrick Construction Strategy
The Sensory Rhodopsin system works in E. coli by fusing SR and Htr with a flexible linker and joint the HtrII membrane-proximal cytoplasmic fragment with the cytoplasmic domain (Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein (MCP) signalling domain) of the eubacterial chemotaxis receptor [1]. The fusion protein in BBa_K317028 and BBa_K317003 used the Tar gene from Synechocystis typhimurium, have their construct design based on [2]. The previous study made three different junction constructs (P, G, M) based on studies of dimerization, yet no accurate tool was used for domain determination. Therefore, we made the following improvements.

  1. Tar gene from E. coli K12 strain was used instead of that of S. typhimurium, as we believe E. coli can express and function more properly with its native genes and proteins.
  2. We designed the construct by using an accurate protein domain determining tool [3], the whole E. coli Tar protein consist of three domains- Tar ligand binding domain (amino acid sequence 1-175), the HAMP domain (amino acid sequence 194-263) and the Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein (MCP) signalling domain (amino acid sequence 264-553). As only the cytoplasmic domain is needed, the exact Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein (MCP) signalling domain (amino acid sequence 264-553 of EcTar) was cut and fused with membrane-proximal cytoplasmic fragment part of HtrII (amino acid sequence 1- 133).
  3. Restriction sites of HindIII and BamHI were added before and after the SRII gene respectively for enabling switching the sensory rhodopsin portion of the fusion protein. A series of mutant sensory rhodopsins was identified which covers a large variation of absorbing spectrum [2]. These two restriction sites allow further switching of the sensing unit, so the light sensing system can be tuned for sensing different kinds of light source.

The improvements made were successful as the function (sense light for cell movement) of the above fusion proteins were tested with positive results shown below.

II. Method of measurement
According to previous studies on positive phototactic microorganisms, colonies of microorganisms should spread towards the light source. [4] 

As our cells receive stimulation of blue light from all directions instead of unidirectional as what the paper used, therefore, they spread out in all directions after 12 h exposure of light. Average diameters were measured by an electronic ruler with precision of 0.01 mm. Data of diameters from at least three independent clones were collected. Paired t-test was used to analyze the collected data. A significant difference was observed between the plates (p < 0.001).

1. Main Page Promoter efficiency for BBa_K786001. BBa_K786002, BBa_K786003

To test the expression of sensory rhodopsin triggered by constitutive promoter BBa_J23100 to sense light,

we need to test the effect conferred by different E. coli strains to expression of red fluorescence protein reporter downstream of BBa_J23100 to different bacterial strains. It allows us to select the suitable strain(s) for this constitutive promoter for expressing sensory rhodopsin.

Florescence plate reader was used to take readings of fluorescence emission of 635nm and absorbance at 600nm (OD600) between time intervals of 12 hours on each strain. The measurements were started when the cultures reached a OD600 of around 0.4 that represents log phase of active proliferation. Growth curve and fluorescence intensity against time were plotted to compare cell growth and protein expression on different strains.

Three independent experiments were conducted. No significant difference was observed on the growth curves, indicating a similar growth rate among the three bacterial strains with BBa_J23100 transformed. It implies the promoter does not cause cell toxicity or growth inhibition of these three bacterial strains.

Description: ::Desktop:iGEM 2012:Characterization on Bba_J23100 OD600.jpg

For the protein expression, the results showed that the fluorescence intensity of reporter in DH5α was significantly lower compared with TOP10 and BL21(DE3).

Description: ::Desktop:iGEM 2012:Characterization on Bba_J23100-fluoresence.jpg

 

To conclude, DH5α is not an optimal strain to utilize promoter BBa_J23100, while TOP10 and BL 21(DE3) can effectively express the reporter. Therefore, in downstream application of our light sensing biobricks (BBa_K786001, BBa_K786002, BBa_K786003) in which BBa_J23100 was used, DH5α are not used.

2. Main PagePositive Phototactic Construct for Blue Light Detection (BBa_K786002)

To evaluate whether our biobrick BBa_K786002 causes cell movement under blue light exposure, we transferred transformed bacteria on soft agar and observe if it moves under blue light. It is known that bacteria can swim on soft agar.

Soft agar (0.4%) plate was prepared. Cell cultures transformed with BBa_K786002 (6, 12 and 25 µl) with OD600 ~2 were pipetted on each semi-agar plate. Duplicate aliquots were done on each plate and four plates were made. Two of the plates were placed in dark and two were placed under blue LED light of 200 mW (with spectra covering from 430-480 nm).

Description: C:\Users\Ricky\Documents\igem\rhodopsin\result\blue light (1).PNG

We placed the plates overnight for 12 h at 25oC and compared the diameter differences between the plates with or without blue light exposure. We used paired t-test for analyzing the collected data. A significant difference was observed between the plates (p < 0.001). The average diameters of three clones exposed under blue light are bigger than the counterparts in dark. Blue light triggers a change in diameter of 180 ± 40 %, while there is no significant change in diameter for those without BBa_K786002. When we put the bacteria transformed with BBa_K786002 under light, the blue light stimulates SRII and switches on the hisitine kinase CheY by decreasing the phosphorylation level of CheY (CheY-P). Therefore, a prolonged running period in bacteria is resulted as CheY-P causes cell tumbling, a random movement. When the cell tumbles and faces towards light, SRII is stimulated again. The process repeats and the cell will eventually travel towards blue light.
Description: ::Desktop:iGEM 2012:Protein B with light on semi-agar.jpg
3. Main PagePhototactic Construct for Orange Light Detection (BBa_K786003)

See our modeling page for more details.

4. Cell sorting by Phototactic Construct for Orange Light Detection (BBa_K786003) and Positive Phototactic Construct for Blue Light Detection (BBa_K786002)

To evaluate the cell sorting function of our biobricks BBa_K786002 and BBa_K786003, we transferred bacteria transformed with BBa_K786002 (sensitive to blue light) and BBa_K786003 (sensitive to orange light) on soft agar and observed their movements under blue and orange light source from different directions.

Soft agar (0.4%) plate was prepared. A mix of two individual Ccell cultures transformed with BBa_K786002 and BBa_K786003 (12 µl each) respectively with OD600 ~2 were pipetted onto two semi-agar plates. One of the plates was placed in dark while another one was exposed to blue and orange light in opposite direction. The plates were placed overnight for 12 h at 25oC.

The bacteria colony separated towards opposite directions after exposed to blue and orange light, while the colony left in the dark has no significant change in shape, suggesting the bacteria sensitive to blue light and orange light have migrated towards to corresponding light sources respectively.


Home   |   Team   |   Project   |   Biobricks   |   Human Practice   |   Safety   |   Documentation   |   Acknowledgement

 

Address: Rm. 184, Science Centre, CUHK
Email: kingchan@cuhk.edu.hk  Tel: (852)-39434420  Fax: (852)-26037246

© Copyright CUHK iGEM Team 2012, All Rights Reserved.