Team:NRP-UEA-Norwich/Project

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(47 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{UEANRP}}
{{UEANRP}}
 +
{{UEANRPProjects}}
{{UEANRPProjects}}
-
'''RUSSELL, KHADIJA AND PASCOE TO ORGANISE SUMMARIES OF THE THREE PAGES'''
+
==NRP-UEA-Norwich Project Overview==
Sensory BioBrick systems have been a large constituent of previous iGEM projects in which teams have combined impressive amounts of logic with limitless creativity in order to produce synthetically engineered organisms with the ability to detect the presence of specific substrates; this was achieved by combining various promoters and reporters to produce novel gene systems of great breadth and depth.
Sensory BioBrick systems have been a large constituent of previous iGEM projects in which teams have combined impressive amounts of logic with limitless creativity in order to produce synthetically engineered organisms with the ability to detect the presence of specific substrates; this was achieved by combining various promoters and reporters to produce novel gene systems of great breadth and depth.
-
 
We too have taken a sensory approach to our project and have produced systems involved in the sensation of nitric oxide (NO). Originally we set out to develop a bacterial and mammalian hybrid NO-sensing promoter (which we have achieved); we then looked into ways of quantifying the levels of highly reactive and difficult to measure NO within a system, leading to us producing a novel gene regulation system known as the comparator circuit. Throughout the project we went on to look at theoretical alternative approaches to the gene systems we have produced.
We too have taken a sensory approach to our project and have produced systems involved in the sensation of nitric oxide (NO). Originally we set out to develop a bacterial and mammalian hybrid NO-sensing promoter (which we have achieved); we then looked into ways of quantifying the levels of highly reactive and difficult to measure NO within a system, leading to us producing a novel gene regulation system known as the comparator circuit. Throughout the project we went on to look at theoretical alternative approaches to the gene systems we have produced.
 +
====Overall in our project we have produced 6 sensory BioBricks, 2 BioBricks involved in gene regulation, and have further characterised 4 more BioBricks. All 8 of our BioBricks have been submitted to the registry and the 6 sensory BioBricks have been characterised. Our project consists of three components, read their summaries on this page or click on the images below to see more detailed information including our BioBrick characterisation data.====
-
Overall in our project we have produced 6 sensory BioBricks, 2 BioBricks involved in gene regulation, and have further characterised 4 more BioBricks. All 8 of our BioBricks have been submitted to the registry and the 6 sensory BioBricks have been characterised.
+
 +
{| style="color:#1b2c8a;background-#6C0;" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"width="62%" align="center"
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
!align="left"|[[File:NRPNOLogo.png|link=https://2012.igem.org/Team:NRP-UEA-Norwich/NOSensing |300px]]
 +
!align="left"|[[File:NRPCompLogo.png |link=https://2012.igem.org/Team:NRP-UEA-Norwich/ComparatorCircuit |300px]]
 +
!align="left"|[[File:NRPTheoreticalLogo.png|link=https://2012.igem.org/Team:NRP-UEA-Norwich/TheoreticalProjects |300px]]
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
!align="left"|6 BioBricks created: [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774000 BBa_K774000] -- [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774001 BBa_K774001] -- [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774004 BBa_K774004] -- [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774005 BBa_K774005] -- [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774006 BBa_K774006] -- [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774004 BBa_K774004]
 +
!align="left"|2 BioBricks created: [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774002 BBa_K774002] -- [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774003 BBa_K774003]
 +
!align="left"|Theoretical BioBricks: [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774100 BBa_K774100]
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
|}
 +
 +
====Existing iGEM BioBrick parts which we characterised during our project:====
 +
 +
[http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K216005 PyeaR Promoter BBa_K216005] -- [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K381001 PyeaR Promoter + GFP BBa_K381001] -- [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_E0420 enhanced Cyan Fluorescent Protein + RBS + Terminators BBa_E0420] -- [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K081014 Red Fluorescent Protein + RBS + Terminators BBa_K081014]
----
----
Line 18: Line 37:
 +
Our main project has resulted in the production of a hybrid bacterial and mammalian promoter optimised for induction by nitric oxide, nitrates and nitrites. We have ligated PyeaR, a known bacterial promoter [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K216005 Part BBa_K216005] (Cambridge 2009) in the parts registry, with its mammalian counterpart, CArG. The resulting hybrid promoter has been synthesised in two orientations; PyeaR (bacterial, B) upstream of CArG (mammalian, M), nicknamed (B-M); and CArG upstream of PyeaR (M-B). These orientations were submitted to the parts registry as our first two BioBricks.
-
[[File:MB.png | 200px | right | thumbnail | '' '''Figure 1.''' A graphical representation of the hybrid promoter in its Mammalian-Bacterial orientation, also showing restriction sites.'' ]]
+
Each orientation of the promoter was ligated to enhanced cyan fluorescent protein (eCFP) and red fluorescent protein (RFP) to produce four new BioBricks which have been submitted to the parts registry. These promoter + fluorescent protein BioBricks have been characterised following transformation into ''Escherichia coli'' and induction by potassium nitrate using methods such as flow cytometry, fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and scanning with a fluorometer. The data from these experiments has proved that our promoter works as we expected it to.  
-
[[File:BM.png | 200px | right| thumbnail | '' '''Figure 2.''' A graphical representation of the hybrid promoter in its Bacterial-Mammalian orientation, also showing restriction sites.'']]
+
We have also transfected M-B + eCFP into a human breast cancer cell line, MCF7, and have provided data to show that the system is flexible and can be used in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes. We believe the promoters we have produced have relevant uses in cancer therapeutics, soil fertilisation and detection of emissions from industries such as construction.
-
Our own hybrid promoter hopes to add to the systems already in the registry by creating a hybrid promoter that combines the bacterial promoter PyeaR and the mammalian CArG element , both of which respond to exogenous nitrogenous species. Combining the two would allow a more modular NO sensor that can be used in mammalian and bacterial cells interchangeably.
+
Our 6 BioBricks:
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
The University of East Anglia has a great deal of research groups studying nitrogenous species, therefore we decided to look into using synthetic biology to try and help solve any problems they had experienced; one of the main issues was with the use of nitric oxide, as it is difficult to work with due to its highly reactive nature. We decided to take on this challenge and investigate how we could use synthetic biology to quantitatively measure NO levels in an environment.
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
We began by synthesising a dual promoter taking elements of bacterial NO-sensing promoters and mammalian NO-sensing promoters; this has led to our hybrid promoter, a combination of the PyeaR promoter (bacterial, given as 'B' in our project) and the CArG promoter (mammalian, given as 'M' in our project). These two elements have been synthesised in two orientations; mammalian upstream of bacterial (M-B) (Figure 1) and bacterial upstream of mammalian (B-M) (Figure 2); this allows our promoter to be flexible and have use in both prokarayotes and eukarayotes.
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
Over the course of our project we have produced six individual BioBricks using these hybrid promoters; M-B alone, M-B with RFP and M-B with CFP; and B-M alone, B-M with RFP and B-M with CFP. The BioBricks containing fluorescent proteins were transformed into an ''Escherichia Coli'' chassis and through induction by potassium nitrate (using the nitrate as a homogenous substitute for nitric oxide) we have observed expression of RFP and CFP. We have also conducted experiments to measure the level of fluorescence (and thus transcription) under different concentrations of potassium nitrate; to do this we carried out flow cytometry, fluorescence-activated cell sorting, and scanned samples using a fluorometer. Our data thus far has suggested that in the case of CFP, M-B has a higher transcription rate than B-M; however, in the case of RFP both M-B and B-M appear to have similar rates of transcription. In the majority of fluorometer experiments it appeared that the maximum concentration of potassium nitrate that the cell could cope with was between 15 and 20 mM, as 15 mM gave the highest fluorescence intensity, while 20 mM showed much lower fluorescence intensity; we hypothesise that this is due to 20 mM potassium nitrate being toxic, or due to over-expression of the fluorescent proteins resulting in aggregation and the formation of inclusion bodies.
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
We have also transfected mammalian cells with M-B attached to CFP and added SNAP (a nitricoxide-producing agent) in order to induce transcription. Results appeared to show low levels of CFP expression in cells without SNAP (pertaining to normal physiological levels of nitric oxide) and higher levels of CFP expression once SNAP had been added.
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
The flexibility of the hybrid mammalian and bacterial dual promoter allows for many advances in sensation and control of nitric oxide. For instance NO has been recognised for its implications as a potential cancer therapeutic (due to macrophage usage of NO as an immune response) therefore this promoters allows for the development of systems in easier to use, faster-growing bacteria that can then be applied to mammalian cells for testing. We believe this to be a novel approach made possible through our BioBricks.
+
 +
[http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774000 Bacterial-Mammalian/B-M (PyeaR-CArG) Hybrid Promoter] -- [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774001 Mammalian-Bacterial/M-B (CArG-PyeaR) Hybrid Promoter] -- [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774004 B-M + eCFP] -- [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774005 B-M + RFP] -- [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774006 M-B + eCFP] -- [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774004 M-B + RFP]
----
----
Line 46: Line 52:
[[File:NRPCompLogo.png | centre | link=Team:NRP-UEA-Norwich/ComparatorCircuit]]
[[File:NRPCompLogo.png | centre | link=Team:NRP-UEA-Norwich/ComparatorCircuit]]
-
[[File:Comparator circuit.png | 200px |right | thumbnail | '' '''Figure 3.''' The electrical circuitary of the comparator circuit.'']]
+
[[File:QuanticareComparator.png | right | 250 px | thumbnail | '''Figure 1.''' A graphic showing the result of the comparator circuit; mRNAs transcribed following activation of two promoters have cancelled one another out, leaving only the overhang representative to the imbalance in substrate chemicals to be translated and expressed.]]
-
The lack of specificity of the bacterial promoter, pYEAR, used in the hybrid promoter was a pitfall that was always a concern. From this potential problem spawned a potential solution; the Comparator Circuit.This pair of BioBricks is designed to specifically bind to each other while ligated to two different promoters of overlapping specificity to result in an integrating of the conflicting outputs of the two opposing gene systems.
+
The lack of specificity of the bacterial promoter, pYeaR, used in the hybrid promoter was a pitfall that was always a concern when it came to accurately sensing nitric oxide. From this potential problem spawned a potential solution; the Comparator Circuit. This pair of BioBricks are designed to specifically bind to each other while ligated to two different promoters of overlapping specificity to result in an integration of the conflicting outputs of the two opposing gene systems.
Line 57: Line 63:
-
Our team have constructed a countercurrent comparator circuit in which the reporter proteins are at the same end of the complimentary region, although a contracurrent system has been theorised. Both systems share a crucial subtractive nature comparable to an analogue computer. We envisage that, should the system be fine-tuned and expanded on, a variety of different business sectors from agriculture to spinoff pharmaceutical companies (such as the fictious QuantaCare) could capitalise on this novel genetic technology.
+
Our team have constructed a countercurrent comparator circuit in which the reporter proteins are at the same end of the complimentary region, although a contracurrent system has been theorised. Both systems share a crucial subtractive nature comparable to an analogue computer. We envisage that, should the system be fine-tuned and expanded on, a variety of different business sectors from agriculture to spinoff pharmaceutical companies (<html><font size=2pt><b>Please check out our <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:NRP-UEA-Norwich/Quanticare">Quanticare</a> page for more details</b></font></html>) could capitalise on this novel genetic technology.
-
What we have produced is a biobrick pair that work in harmony, when ligated to promoters of interest and genes of interest, to sequester translation when both mRNA transcripts are present in the cell. The use of quantative tuners with these biobricks is encouraged to ensure that the transcription rate both gene constructs are equal when both promoters are transcribing at their optimal rate. Although the parts have been submitted to the registry and theoretically characterised, time constraints have meant that further lab-based characterisation could not occur.
+
What we have produced is a BioBrick pair that work in harmony, when ligated to promoters of interest and genes of interest, to sequester translation when both mRNA transcripts are present in the cell. The use of quantative tuners with these BioBricks is encouraged to ensure that the transcription rate both gene constructs are equal when both promoters are transcribing at their optimal rate. Although the parts have been submitted to the registry and theoretically characterised, time constraints have meant that further lab-based characterisation could not occur.
-
However, we hope to utilise any free time in our timetables sduring the next semester to characterise the biobricks further (please see our project proposal), and hope that we will be given a chance to present our further findings at MIT!  
+
However, we hope to utilise any free time in our timetables sduring the next semester to characterise the BioBricks further (please see our project proposal), and hope that we will be given a chance to present our further findings at MIT!  
Line 75: Line 81:
-
'''Division circuit'''
+
In addition to the two main projects, we have also worked to elaborate on some of the teams earlier ideas during the project:
-
The comparator circuit that we have created integrates two different transcription levels in a negative manner (subtraction) to perform a range of functions a range of different integrations (calculations) are necessary to this end we have also designed a system that would allow one signal (transcription rate) to be divided by the transcription level of another promoter. To achieve this we have used the processes of attenuation and the three loop system (in the tryp leader). the system has also been mathematically modelled. to find more please click the image above.
+
'''Multiplicative circuit'''
-
'''Multisensor'''
+
The comparator circuit that we have created integrates two different transcription levels in a negative manner (subtraction) to perform a range of functions a range of different integrations (calculations) are necessary to this end we have also designed a system that would allow one signal (transcription rate) to be divided by the transcription level of another promoter. To achieve this we have used the processes of attenuation and the three loop system (in the trp leader). the system has also been mathematically modeled. To find out more please click the image above.
-
There are many groups of chemical species for which there are no current biological techniques for distinguishing between each of these species and quantitatively analysing its concentration. Here we outline a possible approach for solving this problem using non-specific transcription factors and promoters. We use nitrates nitrites and nitric oxide as our example group. To find more please click the image above.
 
-
in addition to the two main projects, we have also worked to elaborate on some of the teams earlier ideas during the project.
+
'''Multisensor'''
 +
 
 +
There are many groups of chemical species for which there are no current biological techniques for distinguishing between each of these species and quantitatively analysing its concentration. Here we outline a possible approach for solving this problem using non-specific transcription factors and promoters. We use nitrates, nitrites and nitric oxide as our example group. To find more please click the image above.

Latest revision as of 00:55, 27 September 2012

Header1NewGreen.png

NRP UEA iGEM 2012

 

Welcome to the NRP UEA iGEM 2012 Wiki Projects Menu

Please choose the relevant link to view an overview of each project!

Nitric Oxide Sensing & The Hybrid Promoters | The Comparator Circuit | Theoretical Projects

NRP-UEA-Norwich Project Overview

Sensory BioBrick systems have been a large constituent of previous iGEM projects in which teams have combined impressive amounts of logic with limitless creativity in order to produce synthetically engineered organisms with the ability to detect the presence of specific substrates; this was achieved by combining various promoters and reporters to produce novel gene systems of great breadth and depth.

We too have taken a sensory approach to our project and have produced systems involved in the sensation of nitric oxide (NO). Originally we set out to develop a bacterial and mammalian hybrid NO-sensing promoter (which we have achieved); we then looked into ways of quantifying the levels of highly reactive and difficult to measure NO within a system, leading to us producing a novel gene regulation system known as the comparator circuit. Throughout the project we went on to look at theoretical alternative approaches to the gene systems we have produced.

Overall in our project we have produced 6 sensory BioBricks, 2 BioBricks involved in gene regulation, and have further characterised 4 more BioBricks. All 8 of our BioBricks have been submitted to the registry and the 6 sensory BioBricks have been characterised. Our project consists of three components, read their summaries on this page or click on the images below to see more detailed information including our BioBrick characterisation data.

NRPNOLogo.png NRPCompLogo.png NRPTheoreticalLogo.png
6 BioBricks created: [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774000 BBa_K774000] -- [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774001 BBa_K774001] -- [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774004 BBa_K774004] -- [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774005 BBa_K774005] -- [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774006 BBa_K774006] -- [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774004 BBa_K774004] 2 BioBricks created: [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774002 BBa_K774002] -- [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774003 BBa_K774003] Theoretical BioBricks: [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774100 BBa_K774100]

Existing iGEM BioBrick parts which we characterised during our project:

[http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K216005 PyeaR Promoter BBa_K216005] -- [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K381001 PyeaR Promoter + GFP BBa_K381001] -- [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_E0420 enhanced Cyan Fluorescent Protein + RBS + Terminators BBa_E0420] -- [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K081014 Red Fluorescent Protein + RBS + Terminators BBa_K081014]

NRPNOLogo.png


Our main project has resulted in the production of a hybrid bacterial and mammalian promoter optimised for induction by nitric oxide, nitrates and nitrites. We have ligated PyeaR, a known bacterial promoter [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K216005 Part BBa_K216005] (Cambridge 2009) in the parts registry, with its mammalian counterpart, CArG. The resulting hybrid promoter has been synthesised in two orientations; PyeaR (bacterial, B) upstream of CArG (mammalian, M), nicknamed (B-M); and CArG upstream of PyeaR (M-B). These orientations were submitted to the parts registry as our first two BioBricks.

Each orientation of the promoter was ligated to enhanced cyan fluorescent protein (eCFP) and red fluorescent protein (RFP) to produce four new BioBricks which have been submitted to the parts registry. These promoter + fluorescent protein BioBricks have been characterised following transformation into Escherichia coli and induction by potassium nitrate using methods such as flow cytometry, fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and scanning with a fluorometer. The data from these experiments has proved that our promoter works as we expected it to.

We have also transfected M-B + eCFP into a human breast cancer cell line, MCF7, and have provided data to show that the system is flexible and can be used in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes. We believe the promoters we have produced have relevant uses in cancer therapeutics, soil fertilisation and detection of emissions from industries such as construction.

Our 6 BioBricks:

[http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774000 Bacterial-Mammalian/B-M (PyeaR-CArG) Hybrid Promoter] -- [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774001 Mammalian-Bacterial/M-B (CArG-PyeaR) Hybrid Promoter] -- [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774004 B-M + eCFP] -- [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774005 B-M + RFP] -- [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774006 M-B + eCFP] -- [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K774004 M-B + RFP]


NRPCompLogo.png
Figure 1. A graphic showing the result of the comparator circuit; mRNAs transcribed following activation of two promoters have cancelled one another out, leaving only the overhang representative to the imbalance in substrate chemicals to be translated and expressed.

The lack of specificity of the bacterial promoter, pYeaR, used in the hybrid promoter was a pitfall that was always a concern when it came to accurately sensing nitric oxide. From this potential problem spawned a potential solution; the Comparator Circuit. This pair of BioBricks are designed to specifically bind to each other while ligated to two different promoters of overlapping specificity to result in an integration of the conflicting outputs of the two opposing gene systems.


Our system relies on two constructs that interact via complimentary base pair sequences both before and after the ribosome binding site of the reporter protein. The idea being that, when both transcripts are present in the chassis, they would bind together, inhibiting the translation of the reporter proteins.


Any imbalance of transcription due to the presence of the substrate of interest results in free mRNA of the gene system that detects that substrate. Crucially, if both promoters detect the same substrates but differ with one extra substrate being detected by one of the promoters, it is this substrate and this substrate only that our system will be able to detect in a simple and quantitative way.


Our team have constructed a countercurrent comparator circuit in which the reporter proteins are at the same end of the complimentary region, although a contracurrent system has been theorised. Both systems share a crucial subtractive nature comparable to an analogue computer. We envisage that, should the system be fine-tuned and expanded on, a variety of different business sectors from agriculture to spinoff pharmaceutical companies (Please check out our Quanticare page for more details) could capitalise on this novel genetic technology.


What we have produced is a BioBrick pair that work in harmony, when ligated to promoters of interest and genes of interest, to sequester translation when both mRNA transcripts are present in the cell. The use of quantative tuners with these BioBricks is encouraged to ensure that the transcription rate both gene constructs are equal when both promoters are transcribing at their optimal rate. Although the parts have been submitted to the registry and theoretically characterised, time constraints have meant that further lab-based characterisation could not occur.


However, we hope to utilise any free time in our timetables sduring the next semester to characterise the BioBricks further (please see our project proposal), and hope that we will be given a chance to present our further findings at MIT!


To conclude, what we have created is a pair of antagonistic BioBricks that turned the pair of mRNAs in which they reside into translational repressor molecules when both are transcribed in tandum within a specific chassis of interest, a new application for mRNA complimentary base pairing within the registry and a project we feel could go very far indeed.



NRPTheoreticalLogo.png


In addition to the two main projects, we have also worked to elaborate on some of the teams earlier ideas during the project:

Multiplicative circuit

The comparator circuit that we have created integrates two different transcription levels in a negative manner (subtraction) to perform a range of functions a range of different integrations (calculations) are necessary to this end we have also designed a system that would allow one signal (transcription rate) to be divided by the transcription level of another promoter. To achieve this we have used the processes of attenuation and the three loop system (in the trp leader). the system has also been mathematically modeled. To find out more please click the image above.


Multisensor

There are many groups of chemical species for which there are no current biological techniques for distinguishing between each of these species and quantitatively analysing its concentration. Here we outline a possible approach for solving this problem using non-specific transcription factors and promoters. We use nitrates, nitrites and nitric oxide as our example group. To find more please click the image above.

Retrieved from "http://2012.igem.org/Team:NRP-UEA-Norwich/Project"