Team:SDU-Denmark/labwork/Notebook/week4

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(7 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 219: Line 219:
<!--\\\\ ACCORDION MENU ////-->
<!--\\\\ ACCORDION MENU ////-->
-
<iframe src="https://2012.igem.org/Team:SDU-Denmark/menu" frameborder="0" height="500" width="200" scrolling="no"  ALLOWTRANSPARENCY="true">
+
<iframe src="https://2012.igem.org/Team:SDU-Denmark/menu" frameborder="0" height="1000" width="200" scrolling="no"  ALLOWTRANSPARENCY="true">
   <p>Your browser does not support iframes.</p>
   <p>Your browser does not support iframes.</p>
</iframe>
</iframe>
Line 249: Line 249:
<!-- /// velkomst ////-->
<!-- /// velkomst ////-->
-
<h2>Laboratory Notebook</h2>
+
<h1>Laboratory Notebook</h1>
-
<p>
+
 
-
Here you find the log book for the procedures carried out in the laboratory, starting from week 27. 
+
-
</p>
+
<table border="1" bordercolor="#FE1919" style="background-color:#EDEDED" width="100%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="3">
<table border="1" bordercolor="#FE1919" style="background-color:#EDEDED" width="100%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="3">
Line 281: Line 279:
     <span class="classred"><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:SDU-Denmark/labwork/Notebook/week8">8th week      </a></span>    </regulartext></td>
     <span class="classred"><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:SDU-Denmark/labwork/Notebook/week8">8th week      </a></span>    </regulartext></td>
</tr>
</tr>
-
</table>
+
<tr>
 +
<td id="tablestyle1"><regulartext>
 +
    <span class="classred"><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:SDU-Denmark/labwork/Notebook/week9">9th week</a></span>    </regulartext></td>
-
                                            <!----------4th WEEK---------->
+
<td id="tablestyle1"><regulartext>
 +
    <span class="classred"><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:SDU-Denmark/labwork/Notebook/week10">10th week</a></span>    </regulartext></td>
 +
<td id="tablestyle1"><regulartext>
 +
    <span class="classred"><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:SDU-Denmark/labwork/Notebook/week11">11th week</a></span>    </regulartext></td>
-
<p> <b>23-07-2012:</b> </p>
+
<td id="tablestyle1"><regulartext>
-
<h2>SST send for sequencing </h2> <br/>  
+
    <span class="classred"><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:SDU-Denmark/labwork/Notebook/week12">12th week</a></span>     </regulartext></td>
-
<p>
+
</tr>
 +
</table>
-
SST from the gel extraction the 21-07-2012 was diluted to a concentration of 100ng/µL and separated to 4 samples of 15µL each and send of for sequencing. <br/>
+
                                            <!----------4th WEEK---------->
-
We made liquid cultures from the SST plates from 19-07-2012 and incubated them O.N.
+
-
<br/> 
 
-
<br/> 
 
-
<p> <b>24-07-2012:</b> </p>
+
<p> <b>23-07-2012 to 29-07-2012</b> </p>
-
<h2>Cryo backup, miniprep and preparation to sequencing </h2> <br/>  
+
<p>
<p>
 +
Another checkdigest was made on SST colonies, we had our doubts about the entegrity of the formerly used restriction enzyme, so a newer EcoRI was used, a get was made and this time we got results. After a checkdigest that showed bands at expected lengths and nanodrop, two samples of 1-SST was sent for sequencing.<br/><br/>
-
We made some Cryo backup’s from the 18 liquid cultures, that was incubated O.N. and took some sample out from each to do a miniprep on. <br/>  
+
4 days later we recieved results from sequencing. As we expected from the original ncbi sequences, the genes contained illegal restriction sites.<br/>
-
We ran a gel on the samples and found that three samples had bands corresponding to our cut gene and vector.  
+
1-SST contained 1 SpeI restriction site and 1-FFT had 1 EcoRI and 1 XbaI. <br/><br/>
-
These will be shipped of to be sequneced tomorrow.
+
 
-
+
Primers for mutagenesis were constructed and ordered with the help of our supervisor Steffen Schmidt
-
<br/> <br/>
+
</p>
-
<p> <b>24-07-2012:</b> </p>
 
-
<h2>SST send for sequencing </h2> <br/>
 
-
<p>
 
-
Dato 25/7-12 Kristian og Lars
 
-
Sample 2.3 and 2.6 was prepared for sequencing by diluting them 6:15 giving a total of around 70-78 ng/uL and sent them for sequencing. Afterward we looked into the expected outcomes of sequencing and had a look at the following mutagenesis post-sequencing. Lars will upload the work when it is done (between now and the weekend).
 
-
-results from sequencing
 
-
-primers ordered
 
<!--
<!--
<div id="contentcolumleft">
<div id="contentcolumleft">

Latest revision as of 02:07, 27 September 2012

iGEM TEAM ::: SDU-DENMARK

Laboratory Notebook

1st week 2nd week 3th week 4th week
5th week 6th week 7th week 8th week
9th week 10th week 11th week 12th week

23-07-2012 to 29-07-2012

Another checkdigest was made on SST colonies, we had our doubts about the entegrity of the formerly used restriction enzyme, so a newer EcoRI was used, a get was made and this time we got results. After a checkdigest that showed bands at expected lengths and nanodrop, two samples of 1-SST was sent for sequencing.

4 days later we recieved results from sequencing. As we expected from the original ncbi sequences, the genes contained illegal restriction sites.
1-SST contained 1 SpeI restriction site and 1-FFT had 1 EcoRI and 1 XbaI.

Primers for mutagenesis were constructed and ordered with the help of our supervisor Steffen Schmidt