Team:Warsaw/Safety
From 2012.igem.org
Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
<br /><br /> | <br /><br /> | ||
- | 2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues?<br/> | + | <u>2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues?<br/></u> |
In our invasion device we use previously created listeriolysin BioBrick(BBa_...), which could be potentially harmful if someone was careless enough to get infected by a bacteria strain carrying this device. Even in this case the danger is limited as strains we use are unable to spread from cell to cell and it is impossible for them to last long in mammalian cells as it was mentioned before. We minimalized the risk by thorough application of our safety protocols.<br /><br /> | In our invasion device we use previously created listeriolysin BioBrick(BBa_...), which could be potentially harmful if someone was careless enough to get infected by a bacteria strain carrying this device. Even in this case the danger is limited as strains we use are unable to spread from cell to cell and it is impossible for them to last long in mammalian cells as it was mentioned before. We minimalized the risk by thorough application of our safety protocols.<br /><br /> | ||
Revision as of 13:23, 6 September 2012
1. Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of: researcher safety, public safety, or environmental safety? Laboratory strains of E. coli and B. subtilis are not pathogenic, thus
not hazardous. Bacillus strain carrying a plasmid with listeriolysin
might be hazardous, so great care must be taken. But even if one does
become infected, this bacteria are unable of replicating and surviving
long inside mammalian cells. They are also incapable of spreading from
cell to cell, meaning that infection could not spread.
2. Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety issues? 3. Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?
|