Team:ZJU-China/model s2 3.htm

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(4 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 109: Line 109:
   padding: 5px 20px;
   padding: 5px 20px;
}
}
 +
table.tm,td.tm
 +
{
 +
  background-color: transparent;
 +
  border:0px;
 +
  font-size:15px;
 +
  border-collapse:collapse;
 +
  padding: 0px;
 +
}
 +
h3
h3
{
{
Line 239: Line 248:
<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="justify">After 1200 iterations, the scaffold and non-scaffold results are as following:</p>
<p align="justify">After 1200 iterations, the scaffold and non-scaffold results are as following:</p>
 +
<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
<table align="center">
<table align="center">
<tr>
<tr>
Line 248: Line 258:
<td>A (Substrate)</td>
<td>A (Substrate)</td>
<td>1417</td>
<td>1417</td>
-
<td>1470<td>
+
<td>1470</td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
Line 271: Line 281:
</tr>
</tr>
</table>
</table>
-
</br>
+
<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
-
<div class="floatC"><img src="http://www.jiajunlu.com/igem/zju_model2_4.jpg" width="400px"></div>
+
<table class="tm" align="center">
-
<p class="fig" align="justify"><b>Fig 4.</b> Result of scaffold system for large scale simulation. After 1200 iterations, there are 436 B and 147 C.</p>
+
<tr>
-
<div class="floatC"><img src="http://www.jiajunlu.com/igem/zju_model2_5.jpg" width="400px"></div>
+
<td class="tm"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/3/3a/Scaffold.gif" width="350px" /></td>
-
<p class="fig" align="justify"><b>Fig 5.</b> Result of non-scaffold system for large scale simulation. After 1200 iterations, there are 451 B and 79 C.</p>
+
<td class="tm"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/a/ab/Nonscaffold.gif" width="350px" /></td>
 +
</tr>
 +
</table>
 +
<p class="fig" align="justify"><b>Fig 4.(Left)</b> Result of scaffold system for large scale simulation. After 1200 iterations, there are 436 B and 147 C.<br/>
 +
<b>Fig 5.(Right)</b> Result of non-scaffold system for large scale simulation. After 1200 iterations, there are 451 B and 79 C.</p>
<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
<h2>Comparison between the two system</h2>
<h2>Comparison between the two system</h2>
<p align="justify">As the iteration increasing, the number of A is decreasing and the number of B and C are increasing. We record the number of B and C for both scaffold system and non-scaffold system as iteration grows to watch the reaction rate of pathway (i.e. the number of C).</p>
<p align="justify">As the iteration increasing, the number of A is decreasing and the number of B and C are increasing. We record the number of B and C for both scaffold system and non-scaffold system as iteration grows to watch the reaction rate of pathway (i.e. the number of C).</p>
-
  <div class="floatC"><img src="http://www.jiajunlu.com/igem/zju_model2_6.jpg" width="400px"></div>
+
  <div class="floatC"><img src="http://www.jiajunlu.com/igem/zju_model2_6.jpg" width="400px">
-
<p class="fig" align="justify"><b>Fig 6.</b> The number of B and C as iteration grows.</p>
+
<p class="fig"><b>Fig 6.</b> The number of B and C as iteration grows.</p>
-
<p align="justify">&nbsp;</p>
+
</div>
-
<p align="justify">From figure 4.5.6, it is obvious that the number of C for scaffold system is more than that for non-scaffold system and the number of B for scaffold system is less than that for non-scaffold system. This phenomenon can be interpreted as that the probability that B meets an E2 is highly increased since their distance is closer. Therefore, it is safely to draw a conclusion that the reaction rate of pathway has been speed up because of the scaffold bringing two enzymes closer.</p>
+
 +
<p align="justify">From figure 4.5.6, it is obvious that the number of C for scaffold system is more than that for non-scaffold system and the number of B for scaffold system is less than that for non-scaffold system. This phenomenon can be interpreted as that the probability that B meets an E2 is highly increased since their distance is closer. Therefore, it is safely to draw a conclusion that the reaction rate of pathway has been speed up because of the scaffold bringing two enzymes closer.</p>
 +
<br/>
</body></html>
</body></html>

Latest revision as of 19:58, 26 October 2012

HOME

A large scale simulation

The initial state is as following:

Edge of cube: 50 units

The amount of A: 2000

The amount of B: 0

The amount of C: 0

The amount of E1: 50

The amount of E2: 50

The distance between E1 and E2 for RNA scaffold: 2 units

 

After 1200 iterations, the scaffold and non-scaffold results are as following:

 

Scaffold Non-scaffold
A (Substrate) 1417 1470
B (Intermediate) 436 451
C (Product) 147 79
E1 (Enzyme1) 50 50
E2 (Enzyme2) 50 50

 

Fig 4.(Left) Result of scaffold system for large scale simulation. After 1200 iterations, there are 436 B and 147 C.
Fig 5.(Right) Result of non-scaffold system for large scale simulation. After 1200 iterations, there are 451 B and 79 C.

 

Comparison between the two system

As the iteration increasing, the number of A is decreasing and the number of B and C are increasing. We record the number of B and C for both scaffold system and non-scaffold system as iteration grows to watch the reaction rate of pathway (i.e. the number of C).

Fig 6. The number of B and C as iteration grows.

From figure 4.5.6, it is obvious that the number of C for scaffold system is more than that for non-scaffold system and the number of B for scaffold system is less than that for non-scaffold system. This phenomenon can be interpreted as that the probability that B meets an E2 is highly increased since their distance is closer. Therefore, it is safely to draw a conclusion that the reaction rate of pathway has been speed up because of the scaffold bringing two enzymes closer.


Retrieved from "http://2012.igem.org/Team:ZJU-China/model_s2_3.htm"