Team:Amsterdam/tania/shadow/
From 2012.igem.org
(13 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | {{Team:Amsterdam/ | + | {{Team:Amsterdam/tania/stylesheet}} |
- | {{Team:Amsterdam/ | + | {{Team:Amsterdam/tania/scripts}} |
- | {{Team:Amsterdam/ | + | {{Team:Amsterdam/tania/Main_Header|home}} |
- | {{Team:Amsterdam/ | + | {{Team:Amsterdam/tania/Header}} |
- | + | ||
- | <p style=" | + | <div id="main-content"> |
- | < | + | <p><span style="align:center">https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/c/ca/Logo-v7-collored.png https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/e/e9/Vu_Uva_Logo_woBG_140px.png</span></p> |
- | < | + | <div style="position:absolute;top:200px;right:100px;width:125px;"> |
+ | </div> | ||
<p><b>Introduction</b> | <p><b>Introduction</b> | ||
<br><br>Prokaryotes have been selected through evolutionary processes for accurate sensing | <br><br>Prokaryotes have been selected through evolutionary processes for accurate sensing | ||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
the span of time we can use to do measurements on.</p> | the span of time we can use to do measurements on.</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
- | {{Team:Amsterdam/ | + | {{Team:Amsterdam/tania/Foot}} |
Latest revision as of 13:48, 8 July 2012
Introduction
Prokaryotes have been selected through evolutionary processes for accurate sensing
and acting upon their living environments. This bacterial versatility can be used by
us, humans, to sense the environments in places we have trouble reaching. Maybe we
would want to measure the conditions (e.g. nutrient availability, toxicity, pathogen
presence, light) somewhere deep under the ground, perhaps we would want to noninvasively
scan for biomarkers in diseased tissue in our bodies. The classical way
to make a bacteria tell us whether a certain event has happened is to link it to the
transcription of fluorescent proteins. This however requires constant monitoring and
maintenance in order to get an idea of the time-variation of the studied system. Could
we make the cell ‘remember’ what it has sensed and when so we can leave it alone for a
while and make it report back to us later?
Meet E. memo, a ‘cellular logbook’, which uses the naturally occurring phenomenon
of DNA methylation to robustly store signals it has sensed in its environment. The
Amsterdam iGEM 2012 team, consisting of six students, will dedicate the summer to
the realization of this innovative and ambitious plan. This novel storage mechanism,
redesignating an evolutionarly designed tested and proven principle for novel purposes,
could be linked to any of the many biological sensors that are available in the DNA
parts registry. E. memo therefore holds great promise as a detect & store–system for
experimental and industrial purposes.
Just storing whether certain signals have been sensed by the cell is only half of the story
however. The proposed memory mechanism would be a form of volatile memory,
of which the traces slowly dissappear as the E. memo-population keeps proliferating.
This is because methylation-patterns are not transferred to the progeny in eukaryotes.
We can use this our advantage. The most exciting part of our project would be to infer
when a signal has been sensed from the percentage of bits that is methylated, which
slowly decreases as the cells keep proliferating. This way, we won’t just store whether
a certain signal has occured; we will also know when it happened.
Molecular mechanism
In short, we will introduce a site-specific methyltransferase into the iGEM default
chassis organism E. coli, that will only be active/transcribed when the measured signal
is encountered by the logbook-cell. The activated methyltransferase will then move
over to a plasmid region we’ve termed the bit and append a methyl-group to it. By
1
linking the methyltransferase to a Zinc-Finger, its site-specificity is greatly increased,
reducing the amount of undesired background methylation events to a minimum.
Furthermore, by slowing down the cell replication cycle of the cells, we can increase
the span of time we can use to do measurements on.