Team:Dundee/Project
From 2012.igem.org
(8 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li class='active '><a href='https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee'><span>Home</span></a></li> | <li class='active '><a href='https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee'><span>Home</span></a></li> | ||
- | <li class='has-sub '><a href=' | + | <li class='has-sub '><a href='https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee/Team'><span>Team</span></a> |
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li><a href='https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee/Team'><span>Team Members</span></a></li> | <li><a href='https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee/Team'><span>Team Members</span></a></li> | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li><a href='https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee/Project'><span>The Problem</span></a></li> | <li><a href='https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee/Project'><span>The Problem</span></a></li> | ||
- | <li><a href='https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee/Solution'><span> | + | <li><a href='https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee/Solution'><span>Our Solution</span></a></li> |
<li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee/Biobricks"><span>Biobricks</span></a></li> | <li><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee/Biobricks"><span>Biobricks</span></a></li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
- | <li class='has-sub'><a href='https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee/ | + | <li class='has-sub'><a href='https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee/Strategy'><span>Wet Lab</span></a> |
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li><a href='https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee/Strategy'><span>Strategy</span></a></li> | <li><a href='https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee/Strategy'><span>Strategy</span></a></li> | ||
- | <li><a href='https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee/Results'><span> | + | <li><a href='https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee/Results'><span>Experimentation</span></a></li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
- | <li class='has-sub'><a href=' | + | <li class='has-sub'><a href='#'><span>Human Practices</span></a> |
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li><a href='https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee/Safety'><span>Safety</span></a></li> | <li><a href='https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee/Safety'><span>Safety</span></a></li> | ||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
<li><a href='https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee/Collaboration'><span>Collaboration</span></a></li> | <li><a href='https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee/Collaboration'><span>Collaboration</span></a></li> | ||
<li><a href='https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee/Notebook'><span>Notebook</span></a></li> | <li><a href='https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee/Notebook'><span>Notebook</span></a></li> | ||
- | + | <li><a href='https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee/Song'><span>Song!</span></a></li> | |
- | <li><a href='https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee/Song'><span>Song</span></a></li> | + | |
<li><a href='https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee/References'><span>References</span></a></li> | <li><a href='https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee/References'><span>References</span></a></li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
Line 60: | Line 59: | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | |||
<!-- Start Body Content Here --> | <!-- Start Body Content Here --> | ||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
<div class="contentbox" style="height: 665px;"> | <div class="contentbox" style="height: 665px;"> | ||
- | < | + | <h2><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/9/95/Theproblem_header.png"></h2> |
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
- | <p>The main form of treatment of <I>C. difficile</I> infections is to use antibiotics. The current drug of choice is Metronidazole but Vancomycin is also used. Evidence of resistance to Metronidazole has begun to emerge amongst <I>C. difficile</I> populations and in these cases Vancomycin can be used | + | <p>The main form of treatment of <I>C. difficile</I> infections is to use antibiotics. The current drug of choice is Metronidazole but Vancomycin is also used. Evidence of resistance to Metronidazole has begun to emerge amongst <I>C. difficile</I> populations and in these cases Vancomycin can be used, but this is still widely accepted as a drug of last resort so is not an ideal treatment. The main issue associated with the use of antibiotics is that they are often the source of the problem. Broad spectrum antibiotics that are used to treat <I>C. difficile</I> infections further disrupt the gut microbiome and therefore the natural gut flora can take longer to return to their natural levels. As a result, when patients are treated with antibiotics, recurrence occurs in about 20% of cases. These cases are usually further treated by altering the antibiotics used. Following this treatment has a recurrence rate of between 40-60% (Kelly and LaMont 2008). These incidents of recurrence probably occur due to the <I>C. difficile</I> populations recovering before the organisms that out compete them under normal circumstances can efficiently recolonize.</p> |
- | <p>The second form of <I>C. difficile</I> infection treatment is by a faecal transplant. This method is only used in severe cases with multiple recurrences. A faecal transplant involves the faeces of a person, usually a relative of the patient, being transplanted into the patient's colon through a nasal-gastric tube in the form of a faecal slurry or via the rectum. This method aims to reintroduce the natural bacteria that are present in the colon and allow them to out compete <I>C. difficile</I> and keep the population at a controlled level, i.e. preventing it causing infection, as in a healthy individual. In some ways, this treatment works in an opposite way to antibiotics by encouraging the growth of the natural bacteria instead of preventing growth. This method of treatment has been shown to be successful in 95% of cases and is also highly effective in preventing recurrence. | + | <p>The second form of <I>C. difficile</I> infection treatment is by a faecal transplant. This method is only used in severe cases with multiple recurrences. A faecal transplant involves the faeces of a person, usually a relative of the patient, being transplanted into the patient's colon through a nasal-gastric tube in the form of a faecal slurry or via the rectum. This method aims to reintroduce the natural bacteria that are present in the colon and allow them to out compete <I>C. difficile</I> and keep the population at a controlled level, i.e. preventing it causing infection, as in a healthy individual. In some ways, this treatment works in an opposite way to antibiotics by encouraging the growth of the natural bacteria instead of preventing growth. This method of treatment has been shown to be successful in 95% of cases and is also highly effective in preventing recurrence (Brandt et. al. 2012). However, despite the evidence that this method of treatment is superior to antibiotics it is not widely used. The main reason for this is the obvious hygiene issue associated with handling faeces in a hospital environment.</p> |
<h3>Our Project</h3> | <h3>Our Project</h3> | ||
Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
- | With all this information in mind we set out to find a possible alternative treatment for C. difficile infections using synthetic biology. We were keen to utilise the principle of the faecal transplant, i.e. allowing the natural gut bacteria to combat the <I>C. difficile</I>. We decided to use the common lab model organism and microbiome bacteria <I>Escherichia coli</I> (<I>E. coli</I>). Our aim was to engineer a harmless strain of <I>E. coli</I> to target and kill <I>C. difficile</I> organisms during an infection. How we did this is explained in Our Solution. | + | With all this information in mind we set out to find a possible alternative treatment for <I>C. difficile</I> infections using synthetic biology. We were keen to utilise the principle of the faecal transplant, i.e. allowing the natural gut bacteria to combat the <I>C. difficile</I>. We decided to use the common lab model organism and microbiome bacteria <I>Escherichia coli</I> (<I>E. coli</I>). Our aim was to engineer a harmless strain of <I>E. coli</I> to target and kill <I>C. difficile</I> organisms during an infection. How we did this is explained in Our Solution. |
Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
<div class="pickerbox"> | <div class="pickerbox"> | ||
- | <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee/Biobricks"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/ | + | <a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Dundee/Biobricks"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/2/27/Biobricks_button.png"></a> |
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 108: | Line 108: | ||
<div class="footerbox"><br> | <div class="footerbox"><br> | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
- | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/ | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/0/04/Sponsorbar2.jpg"> |
<center> | <center> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Latest revision as of 21:05, 26 September 2012
Current Treatment
The main form of treatment of C. difficile infections is to use antibiotics. The current drug of choice is Metronidazole but Vancomycin is also used. Evidence of resistance to Metronidazole has begun to emerge amongst C. difficile populations and in these cases Vancomycin can be used, but this is still widely accepted as a drug of last resort so is not an ideal treatment. The main issue associated with the use of antibiotics is that they are often the source of the problem. Broad spectrum antibiotics that are used to treat C. difficile infections further disrupt the gut microbiome and therefore the natural gut flora can take longer to return to their natural levels. As a result, when patients are treated with antibiotics, recurrence occurs in about 20% of cases. These cases are usually further treated by altering the antibiotics used. Following this treatment has a recurrence rate of between 40-60% (Kelly and LaMont 2008). These incidents of recurrence probably occur due to the C. difficile populations recovering before the organisms that out compete them under normal circumstances can efficiently recolonize.
The second form of C. difficile infection treatment is by a faecal transplant. This method is only used in severe cases with multiple recurrences. A faecal transplant involves the faeces of a person, usually a relative of the patient, being transplanted into the patient's colon through a nasal-gastric tube in the form of a faecal slurry or via the rectum. This method aims to reintroduce the natural bacteria that are present in the colon and allow them to out compete C. difficile and keep the population at a controlled level, i.e. preventing it causing infection, as in a healthy individual. In some ways, this treatment works in an opposite way to antibiotics by encouraging the growth of the natural bacteria instead of preventing growth. This method of treatment has been shown to be successful in 95% of cases and is also highly effective in preventing recurrence (Brandt et. al. 2012). However, despite the evidence that this method of treatment is superior to antibiotics it is not widely used. The main reason for this is the obvious hygiene issue associated with handling faeces in a hospital environment.