Team:EPF-Lausanne/Modeling/Expression

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{:Team:EPF-Lausanne/Template/Header|Project}}
{{:Team:EPF-Lausanne/Template/Header|Project}}
{{:Team:EPF-Lausanne/Template/SetTitle|Modeling expression levels}}
{{:Team:EPF-Lausanne/Template/SetTitle|Modeling expression levels}}
 +
 +
=Why?=
 +
 +
From our work on [[Team:EPF-Lausanne/Modeling/Photoactivation|LOV2 photoactivation]] we might be able to predict the percentage of LOV2 domains in our LovTAP-VP16, even though this value might be affected by the fact of having both ends fused to other domains: TrpR and VP16.
[[File:EPF-Lausanne-Modeling-path_simple.png|600px]]
[[File:EPF-Lausanne-Modeling-path_simple.png|600px]]

Revision as of 08:32, 26 September 2012

Why?

From our work on LOV2 photoactivation we might be able to predict the percentage of LOV2 domains in our LovTAP-VP16, even though this value might be affected by the fact of having both ends fused to other domains: TrpR and VP16.

EPF-Lausanne-Modeling-path simple.png

92% of photoactive LOV2 has it's Jα-helix undocked (Yao et al, 2008).

Eitoku et al (2005) say it takes 2 ms for the J&alpha-helix to undock.