"
Team:Tianjin/Modeling/Calculation
From 2012.igem.org
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
=Input of Our Calculation= | =Input of Our Calculation= | ||
| + | ===RBS sequence=== | ||
*RFP, normal RBS | *RFP, normal RBS | ||
ATTTCACACATACTAGAGAAAGAGGAGAAATACTAGATGGCTTCCTCCGAAGACGTTATCAAAGAGTT | ATTTCACACATACTAGAGAAAGAGGAGAAATACTAGATGGCTTCCTCCGAAGACGTTATCAAAGAGTT | ||
| Line 24: | Line 25: | ||
TCTTGTT | TCTTGTT | ||
| + | ===16S rRNA sequence=== | ||
| + | *normal 16S: ACCTCCTTA | ||
| + | *orthogonal 16S: ACGGAACTA | ||
{{:Team:Tianjin/footer}} | {{:Team:Tianjin/footer}} | ||
Revision as of 01:53, 23 September 2012
Contents |
Overview
Three problems came up while we start calculating: what sequences to input, which method to use and how cogent the result will be. As for sequence, we input the both the SD and the protein coding sequence.
Our goal is to calculate the total ΔG of each reaction and then predict the amount of protein expressed. There are several softwares dealing with DNA or RNA base-pairing progress, such as NUPACK, RBS-Calculator, and Vienna RNA etc. After comparison, we decide to use RBS-Calculator.
Due to the complication of translation progress and our lack of insight in this issue, the results of our modeling can’t be very precise. But at least it should have the precision of order of magnitude.
Input of Our Calculation
RBS sequence
- RFP, normal RBS
ATTTCACACATACTAGAGAAAGAGGAGAAATACTAGATGGCTTCCTCCGAAGACGTTATCAAAGAGTT
CATGCGTT
- RFP, orthogonal RBS
ATTTCACACATGTTCCGTACTAGATGGCTTCCTCCGAAGACGTTATCAAAGAGTTCATGCGTT
- GFP, normal RBS
TACTAGAGAAAGAGGAGAAATACTAGATGCGTAAAGGAGAAGAACTTTTCACTGGAGTTGTCCCAAT
TCTTGTT
16S rRNA sequence
- normal 16S: ACCTCCTTA
- orthogonal 16S: ACGGAACTA
