Team:Trieste/sandbox/safety

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(add safety)
(delete page)
 
(3 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
{{Team:Trieste/head}}
 
-
<html>
 
-
<div id="body">
 
-
    <div id="container"> <!-- start container -->
 
-
        </html>{{Team:Trieste/menu}}<html>
 
-
<div id="content"> <!-- start content -->
 
-
        <h1 id="h1_lf" class="main_tit"><div>Safety</div></h1>
 
-
            <h1 id="h1_rt" class="main_tit"><div>More</div></h1>
 
-
            <div id="box_main"> <!-- start box_main -->
 
-
<div class="box_contenuti">
 
-
    <ol>
 
-
<li>
 
-
    <span>Would any of your project ideas raise safety issues in terms of:</span>
 
-
    <ul>
 
-
        <li>researcher safety,</li>
 
-
        <li>public safety, or</li>
 
-
        <li>environmental safety</li>
 
-
    </ul>
 
-
    <p>
 
-
Before starting working in the lab we were trained by
 
-
biosafety experts about the rules to follow in laboratory.
 
-
    </p>
 
-
    <span>The key points are:</span>
 
-
    <ul>
 
-
<li>
 
-
    the general behavior rules we must follow, like wearing
 
-
    gloves and lab coat when we manage chemicals and cellular
 
-
    cultures, never eating or drinking inside the work area
 
-
    and smoking outside the building;
 
-
</li> <li>
 
-
    the equipment we need to use, as the UV transilluminator,
 
-
    the laminar flow cabinets, the biosafety hoods, the confocal
 
-
    microscope and the autoclave for tubes and glassware used
 
-
    for cellular cultures and bacteria;
 
-
</li> <li>
 
-
    the containment and the waste handling procedures, in order
 
-
    to avoid the involuntary spreading of microorganisms;
 
-
</li> <li>
 
-
    the waste handling procedures, in order to avoid the
 
-
    involuntary spreading of toxic substances;
 
-
</li>
 
-
    </ul>
 
-
    <p>
 
-
We planned a risk evaluation based on the Italian and UE guidelines and we concluded that
 
-
our project does not represent a danger for public and environmental safety. We performed
 
-
all experiments according to the protocols that respect the current regulations in Italy.
 
-
(for the current laws about researcher, public and environmental safety in Italy click here,
 
-
Dlgs 206/01, Dlgs 81/08 and DM 25.09.2001 )
 
-
    </p>
 
-
    <p>
 
-
Regarding the biological part of  the project, we used only harmless bacteria strains incapable
 
-
to survive outside the laboratory environment like the E.coli strain DH5-alpha, strain HB2151
 
-
and strain W3110. We used heat and Sodium hypochlorite to kill all bacterial cultures at the end
 
-
of the experiments.    We also used E.coli strain Nissle, that is able to live in the external
 
-
environment but it is regularly used as a probiotic for many years, so it is dangerous for the
 
-
human safety.
 
-
    </p>
 
-
    <p>
 
-
The genetic material we used in our project was not extracted directly from other prokaryotic
 
-
or eukaryotic species. All new sequences that can not be found as biobricks, were synthesized.
 
-
    </p>
 
-
    <p>
 
-
Regarding the antibodies, instead of real virions we used virus like particles (VLP) to test
 
-
our antibodies. Viral like particles  are viral protein envelops that do not contain a viral
 
-
genome so they are non-infectious.
 
-
    </p>
 
-
    <span>Both the toxins we intend to use in the project are safe:</span>
 
-
    <ol>
 
-
<li>
 
-
    Our first choice is  Cathelicidin LL-37 associated with Holin. LL-37 is a human
 
-
    antimicrobial peptide, not dangerous to humans nor the environment. Holin is a small
 
-
    bacteriophage-encoded protein that accumulate in the membrane until, at a precise genetically
 
-
    programmed time, the membrane suddenly becomes permealized.
 
-
</li>
 
-
<li>
 
-
    Alternatively, we can use Tse2, a P.aeruginosa toxin which blocks the growth of
 
-
    prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells when expressed intracellularly, but the secreted toxin does
 
-
    not have effect on eukaryotic cells.
 
-
</li>
 
-
    </ol>
 
-
    <p>
 
-
Moreover, our project was implemented with different strong security systems that allow the
 
-
total control over the molecular platform avoiding the horizontal gene transfer.
 
-
    </p>
 
-
</li>
 
-
<li>
 
-
    <strong>Do any of the new BioBrick parts (or devices) that you made this year raise any safety
 
-
issues? If yes,
 
-
<ol>
 
-
    <li>did you document these issues in the Registry?</li>
 
-
    <li>how did you manage to handle the safety issue?</li>
 
-
    <li>How could other teams learn from your experience?</li>
 
-
</ol>
 
-
    </strong>
 
-
    <p>
 
-
The biobricks we made, do not produce protein with toxic effects on humans, plants and animals. The
 
-
cathelicidin LL-37 represents a threat for prokaryotes only.
 
-
    </p>
 
-
</li>
 
-
 
-
<li>
 
-
    <strong>
 
-
    Is there a local biosafety group, committee, or review board at your institution?
 
-
<ul>
 
-
    <li>If yes, what does your local biosafety group think about your project?</li>
 
-
    <li>If no, which specific biosafety rules or guidelines do you have to consider in your country?</li>
 
-
</ul>
 
-
    </strong>
 
-
 
-
    <p>
 
-
The ICGEB (International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology) has a Biosafety Unit
 
-
that is especially focused on the effect of the new technologies on the environment, according to
 
-
the Italian laws (click here to learn more about the ICGEB goals in this field). We explained to
 
-
them our project in detail and then we also filled a form about genetically modified organisms
 
-
requested from the Italian government to estimate the biosafety risks. The ICGEB Biosafety
 
-
Unit evaluated our project and they did not find any particular danger concerning the safety
 
-
and security beyond the usual.
 
-
    </p>
 
-
    <span>We quote you the summary of the form about genetically modified organisms:</span>
 
-
    <p>
 
-
“We used the Escherichia coli ( Bacteria / Eubacteria / Proteobacteria / Gammaproteobacteria/
 
-
Entero-bacteriales / Enterobacteriaceae / Escherichia / E.coli ) strain Nissle 1917, commercialized
 
-
as Mutaflor, as the receiving organism. Mutaflor is commonly used as a probiotic and it can
 
-
be found in the German Collection of Microorganisms in Braunschweig. Several clinical trials
 
-
demonstrate that this strain is harmless to humans and that it has many  beneficial effects.
 
-
E. coli Nissle 1917, was isolated by A. Nissle in 1917 from the feces of a soldier who, in
 
-
contrast with all of his comrades, did not develop enterocolitis during the war on the Balkan
 
-
peninsula, which was highly contaminated by enteropathogens at that time.
 
-
We confirmed its identity using standard microbiology techniques and sequencing the following
 
-
genes 16S, rpoB, recA .  This particular strain is "06:K5:H1": it has an iron uptake system, type
 
-
I fimbriae, cryptic plasmids and semirough LPS. It produces microcines, but no proteic toxins are
 
-
produced, so it doesn't present any danger to animals or plants. It does not contain mycoplasma,
 
-
viruses or viroids, and doesn't have any biogeochemical properties. Genetic instability or any
 
-
previous genetic modification are not reported.  E. coli Nissle 1917 is a ubiquitous strain found
 
-
in all countries. It lives in the ground, in animal or human intestines as a commensal where
 
-
it competes with other bacteria. This bacterium does not form spores on any other quiescent form.
 
-
    </p>
 
-
    <p>
 
-
We transformed the E.coli strain Nissle 1917 with a protein-expressing plasmid J61002 ( 2267
 
-
bp). We decided to insert a gene into its genome  to prevent  the horizontal gene transfer and
 
-
to keep under control the bacterial growth.  Another plasmid in combination with a transposase
 
-
coding plasmid was used to integrate two copies of CymR regulator into the chromosome downstream
 
-
GLMS gene. The integration does not interrupt other genes.
 
-
    </p>
 
-
    <span>Main features of the vector used:</span>
 
-
    <ul>
 
-
        <li>Structural genes: Antibody (SIP/scFv) fused to LPP-OmpA</li>
 
-
        <li>Antibiotic resistant</li>
 
-
        <li>marker gene: Ampicillin</li>
 
-
        <li>Other genes: Tse2 and LL-37 coding genes</li>
 
-
        <li>Regulatory elements: Consitutive promoter and Cumate inducible promoter repressed by CymR and induced by Cumate</li>
 
-
        <li>Sites used for the insertion: EcoRI and PstI</li>
 
-
        <li>ORI: ColE1</li>
 
-
        <li>Mobility: not mobilizable</li>
 
-
        <li>Copy number: high copy (50-70 copies/cell)</li>
 
-
    </ul>
 
-
 
-
    <p>
 
-
The sequences that we inserted are not pathogenic or toxic to animals or plants. In our project
 
-
we use specific tissue cDNA, synthetic DNA and biobricks.
 
-
    </p>
 
-
    <span>The genetic elements that we used:</span>
 
-
    <ul>
 
-
        <li>REPRESSOR - to control the toxin expression</li>
 
-
        <li>TOXIN - to control both the dimension of the bacterial population and to prevent eventual plasmid transfer to other bacteria</li>
 
-
        <li>LPP-OmpA - signal to express the protein fused to the membrane</li>
 
-
        <li>scFv/SIP - single chain variable fragment antibodies to capture the antigens</li>
 
-
    </ul>
 
-
    <p>
 
-
All the constructs made were  fully sequenced and they do not contain any unknown sequence or
 
-
sequence codifying for undesired functions. The transcripts are the ones that we expected as
 
-
their proteins product.  Like the original Nissle, our bacterium is not pathogenic and grows
 
-
less well than the wild-type strain. It also has the same environmental impact as the wild type,
 
-
and it is very stable against mutation even after 50 generations. There are no possibilities
 
-
of horizontal transfer thanks to the addition of a safety gene guard system. The presence of
 
-
pJ61002 plasmid confers to our strain Ampicillin resistance. This kind of marker will be used
 
-
only during the laboratory experiments a then will be replaced with a biocompatible marker.
 
-
Our project may contemplate the inoculation into animals (mice) in the future.
 
-
    </p>
 
-
    <p>
 
-
For our experiments we utilized a maximum of 50mL of culture.  The preparation of the cultures
 
-
consists in inoculating the bacteria in solid or in liquid medium. The bacterial culture can
 
-
reach the highest concentration of 7x10^9 bacteria per ml. All the equipment and the glassware
 
-
used in the laboratory during the project, have been autoclavated and sterilized after use.“
 
-
Vittorio Venturi
 
-
    </p>
 
-
    <p>
 
-
This domument was approved by Vittorio Venturi (a legal responsible about safety in the
 
-
laboratories where the team is working in) and Marco Vegliach (a safety assistant)
 
-
    </p>
 
-
</li>
 
-
<li>
 
-
    <strong>
 
-
    Do you have any other ideas how to deal with safety issues that could be useful for
 
-
future iGEM competitions? How could parts, devices and systems be made even safer through
 
-
biosafety engineering?
 
-
    </strong>
 
-
 
-
    <p>
 
-
Our advice for the future iGEM competitions is to avoid harmful substances like chloramphenicol or
 
-
ethidium bromid during the experiments. Ethidium bromid is an intercalating agent commonly used
 
-
as a nucleic acid stain for agarose gel electrophoresis. It is also a known mutagen. Ethidium
 
-
bromide can be replaced with a non toxic nucleid acid stain like Syber green. Chloramphenicol
 
-
is broad-spectrum antibiotic used as selection marker in standard iGEM vectors. This antibiotic
 
-
has serious adverse effects like bone marrow toxicity so it should be replaced with a less
 
-
toxic marker.  Our advise to iGEM is to create a safety regulations that all teams should
 
-
follow. In this way iGEM can achieve a higher level of biosafety control.
 
-
    </p>
 
-
</li>
 
-
    </ol>
 
-
</div>
 
-
            </div> <!-- end box_main -->
 
-
            <div id="box_right"> <!-- start box_right -->
 
-
            <ul id="sub_menu">
 
-
                <li><a href="#">Sotto menu 1</a></li>
 
-
                    <li class="select"><a href="#">Sotto menu 2</a></li>
 
-
                    <li><a href="#">Sotto menu 3</a></li>
 
-
                    <li><a href="#">Sotto menu 4</a></li>
 
-
                    <li><a href="#">Sotto menu 5</a></li>
 
-
                </ul>
 
-
                <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/b/b0/Team_trieste.jpg" alt="Team iGEM 2012" id="igem_team" />
 
-
                <div class="box_contacts">
 
-
<h2>Contact us</h2>
 
-
<p>For other information, write to:</p>
 
-
                    <a href="mailto:igem2012@gmail.com" class="btn">igem2012@gmail.com</a>
 
-
                    <div class="social">
 
-
                    Follow us also:
 
-
<a href="https://www.facebook.com/IGEMUNITS?ref=ts" target="_blank"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/f/f4/Ico_fb.png" alt="Facebook" class="fb" /></a>
 
-
                        <a href="https://twitter.com/igemunits" target="_blank"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/2/21/Ico_twitter.png" alt="twitter" class="tw" /></a>
 
-
                    </div>
 
-
                </div>
 
-
            </div> <!-- end box_right -->
 
-
            </html>{{Team:Trieste/footer}}<html>
 
-
        <!-- end content is included in template -->
 
-
    </div> <!-- end container -->
 
-
</div>
 
-
</html>
 

Latest revision as of 18:50, 7 September 2012