Wiki/Results.htm

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
Line 113: Line 113:
       <p>&nbsp;</p>
       <p>&nbsp;</p>
       <p align="center"><strong><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/d/de/Tabla1..JPG" width="527" height="197" /></strong></p>
       <p align="center"><strong><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/d/de/Tabla1..JPG" width="527" height="197" /></strong></p>
-
       <p>The following shows the gel digestions confirmatory  promoters constructs:</p>
+
       <p>The constructions that were made, were confirmed by double digestions. The following image shows the digestions that correspond to the insert weight.
 +
</p>
       <p align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/4/4f/Figura1.JPG" width="270" height="250" /></p>
       <p align="center"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/4/4f/Figura1.JPG" width="270" height="250" /></p>

Latest revision as of 04:08, 27 September 2012

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> Home

Logo Principal

RESULT The characteristics of said biopartsare described in the following table:

 

The constructions that were made, were confirmed by double digestions. The following image shows the digestions that correspond to the insert weight.

Fig 2: fluorescence of the different promoters when the bacteria were exposed to UV light.

 

Fig 3: GFP expression vs. Time, we can appreciate that the J23107 promoter is the strongest of the selected, our reference promoter was J23101 

Fig 4:  Polymerases per second, we can appreciate that the J23107 promoter is the strongest of the selected, our reference promoter was J23101 .

With the previous results of the characterization of the promoters there is concluded that the promoter J23107, is the strongest because it produces more PoPs”