Team:Wageningen UR/Coil system

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
m (The Plug and Apply (PnA) System)
(The Plug and Apply (PnA) System)
Line 3: Line 3:
-
= The Plug and Apply (PnA) System =
+
= The Plug-and-Apply-system (PnA system)=
A big challenge of our project is the attachment of ligands and functional proteins on either the outside or inside of a virus-like particle ([[Team:Wageningen_UR/VLPs|VLP]]). We decided to use a noncovalent anchor-like system, which consists of two different coiled-coil proteins. We called it the Plug-and-Apply-system (PnA-system). In figure 1 is shown the actual connection of a ligand (yellow colour) via the PnA-system (shown in red and green colour) to a VLP (light blue colour)
A big challenge of our project is the attachment of ligands and functional proteins on either the outside or inside of a virus-like particle ([[Team:Wageningen_UR/VLPs|VLP]]). We decided to use a noncovalent anchor-like system, which consists of two different coiled-coil proteins. We called it the Plug-and-Apply-system (PnA-system). In figure 1 is shown the actual connection of a ligand (yellow colour) via the PnA-system (shown in red and green colour) to a VLP (light blue colour)
<br><br>
<br><br>

Revision as of 00:30, 27 September 2012


Contents

The Plug-and-Apply-system (PnA system)

A big challenge of our project is the attachment of ligands and functional proteins on either the outside or inside of a virus-like particle (VLP). We decided to use a noncovalent anchor-like system, which consists of two different coiled-coil proteins. We called it the Plug-and-Apply-system (PnA-system). In figure 1 is shown the actual connection of a ligand (yellow colour) via the PnA-system (shown in red and green colour) to a VLP (light blue colour)

Figure 1: Whole VLP with PnA-system and a bound ligand



E- and K-coil

Figure 2: homodimeric GCN4 leucine zipper

For various experiments the E-/K-coil combination IAAL E3 and IAAL K3 reported by Litowksi et al. in 2002 was used.

α-helical coiled-coils represent a widely abundant but simple oligomerization motif in proteins. They have an enormous diversity of functions in nature ranging from motor proteins to transcription factors and chaperones [1]. Coiled-coils are comprised of one single secondary protein structure: the α-helix. Their quaternary structure is stable and does not unfold in aqueous solution at a neutral pH unlike other peptide α-helices. One of the striking structural features of the coiled coils is their build-up of two to five α-helices. These helices contain a heptad repeat of mainly apolar amino acids which is denoted as (abcdefg)^n in literature. The letters a and d are usually amino acids with a highly hydrophobic side chain. The side chains are packed against each other forming a hydrophobic core which allows the formation of a supercoil. Whereas the letter n is representing the number of helices in the final coil. The helices can be identical or even different in sequence and may be aligned in a parallel/antiparallel way. The amino acids of the letters e and g have typically charged residues to allow electrostatic interactions with other peptides (most importantly other coils)[2]. The process of dimerization is largely dependent on the peptide sequence and can be homodimeric (Figure 2.) or heterodimeric (e.g. E- and K-coil). In our project we are utilizing heterodimeric coiled-coils to noncovalently attach proteins. This system is advantageous because of the high stability and specificity. The use of heterodimeric coils additionally prevents the self-dimerization of either the virus capsid monomer or the protein (or ligand) of choice.

Figure 3: cross-section view of a E-/ K-coil heterodimer


In figure 3 the chemical interactions of a E- and K-coil pair are shown, unfortunately not the pair we have used in the case of our experiments. The wide white arrows depict the interhelical hydrophobic interactions (hydrophobic core)[2]. The thin arrows display the electrostatic attractions of the two coils on each other. As mentioned before these electrostatic interactions are caused by the amino acids present on position e and g. In this case glutamic acid (E) and lysine (K). All these interactions greatly contribute to the stability and the prevention of self-dimerization. The correct amino acid sequence of the coil pair IAAL E3 and IAAL K3, which we have implemented in our experiments is stated in table 1[2]. The choice of this pair was made to have a reasonably short coil with only 3 heptad repeats to avoid interference with the quaternary structure of the capsid proteins.

Table 1: Amino acid sequence of the chosen pair of coils (in one letter amino acid code)

name peptide sequence
gabcdefgabcdefgabcdef
IAAL E3 Ac-EIAALEKEIAALEKEIAALEK-NH2
IAAL K3 Ac-KIAALKEKIAALKEKIAALKE -NH2

GFP with E-coil

Figure 4: E-coil attached to a GFP-molecule

In an effort to reduce the amount of laboratory work it was decided to fuse the different capsid proteins of the VLPs with the K-coil only. We designed experiments to add the K-coil to capsid proteins of the Turnip yellows virus (TuYV), the Cowpea chlorotic mottle virus (CCMV) and to Hepatitis B (Hepatitis B) by fusion PCR (for more information see project pages). Possible ligands and other proteins of interest are fused with the E-coil. In this way the GFP - E-coil construct for example is of universal use with either of the 3 different viruses. The GFP E-coil construct was created by a two-step PCR to add the E-coil to a GFP template (taken from the parts registry). The detailed experimental approach can be found in the following methods section.













Methods

We designed three primers to obtain the desired construct in 2 subsequent PCR reactions. The E-coil is fused to the N-terminus of the GFP protein additionally we placed a histidine-tag on the C-terminus.

Figure 5: legend

Figure 6: primers designed for the fusion of GFP with the E.coil

Figure 7: PCR steps for the fusion of GFP with the E.coil

Next to the construct mentioned above, we made a variant of GFP + E-coil without a histidine-tag using the sequencing reverse primer (which anneals to the backbone) instead of the self-designed backward primer .


Results

After some trouble with the PCR reactions at the beginning, the correct construct was obtained, sequenced and ligated into a pSB1C3 plasmid backbone as well as into a BBa_J04500 (behind an IPTG induced promoter) to make it available for the Registry of Standard Biological Parts (BBa_K883701; BBa_K883700; BBa_K883702 and BBa_K883703).

For further experimental information also see our Journal week 20 (obtaining the construct)and week 21 (ligation into the desired backbones)

"Leucine zipper" coils

Next to the E-/K-coil combination we are searching for suitable alternatives. We found the EILD/ KILR coils made by UC Berkeley are attractive, which are already presented in the Standard parts registry of iGEM (BBa_K197021 and BBa_K197022). Both coils are GNC4 leucine zippers which can form homo- and heterodimers. The 2009 iGEM Berkeley wetlab team used this property to show cell-cell adhesion of Escherichia coli cells, if the coils are presented on the cell surface (Figure 8) [3].

Figure 8: cell-cell adhesion using coiled-coils


Despite their proven functionality in cell-cell adhesion both coils are cloned into a BBa_197038 plasmid backbone. This backbone is very unusual for iGEM standard registry parts and is not compatible with either of the other cloning standards. Being aware of this we decided to clone the KILR-coil into a standard 10 plasmid backbone pSB1C3 to allow following iGEM teams to easily work with the Berkeley coils. This experimental approach was done only for the BBa_K197022 KILR. We designed 2 primers containing iGEM standard 10 pre- and suffix to anneal directly on the sequence of the KILR coil.

  • FW primer KILR: 5’ GTTTCTTCGAATTCGCGGCCGCTTCTAGAGGATCTGTTAAAGAACTGGAAGACAAAAA 3’
  • BW primer KILR: 5’ TACTAGTAGCGGCCGCTGCAGGAAGAAACCGCAACCACCACGTTCAC 3’
Figure 9: st.10 PCR Berkeley KILR
Figure 10: KILR transformation plate with nice red-white screening possibility
Figure 11: KILR linearization


















The digested PCR product was ligated into a BBa_J04450 (RFP coding device) plasmid to allow a red-white screening of the transformed colonies after transformation by electroporation. 5 white colonies checked by digestion, if they yielded a plasmid of the expected size. The gel electrophoresis of figure 10 shows the expected constructs lengths except for sample 4, which was discarded. Sample 1 and 2 were sent for sequencing. Unfortunately the BBa_K883600 was send to partsregistry before sequencing revealed that all 2 samples lack a SpeI restriction site. But they contain the full sequence of the KILR coil (about 111bp)+ the restrictions-sites of EcoRI, XbaI and PstI.

Ideas - possible Epitopes and Ligands

The parts registry already contains both ligands and epitopes which can be attached to the VLPs using the PnA-system. An overview is given in the table below. Many of the BioBricks are still 'planning', but the design can be used to attach to the E-coil.

Table 2 Overview of epitopes and ligands from the parts registry

Epitopes Author URL Type Status
V5 epitope tag tail domain (GKPIPNPLLGLDST) Reshma Shetty http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_T2018 proteindomain/affinity Planning
V5 epitope tag head domain (GKPIPNPLLGLDST) Reshma Shetty http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_T2019 proteindomain/affinity Planning
V5 epitope tag special internal domain (GKPIPNPLLGLDST) Reshma Shetty http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_T2020 proteindomain/affinity Planning
VSV-G epitope tag tail domain (YTDIEMNRLGK) Reshma Shetty http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_T2021 proteindomain/affinity Planning
VSV-G epitope tag special internal domain (YTDIEMNRLGK) Reshma Shetty http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_T2022 proteindomain/affinity Planning
ITGA4 - B epitope QGEM_09 http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K214003 Null Available
Ligands
Delta-mCherry Juxtacrine Signaling Ligand MammoBlock Grant Robinson http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K511302 Null Planning
Delta-mCherry-4xFF4 Juxtacrine Signaling Ligand MammoBlock Grant Robinson http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K511303 Null Planning
Stem cell factor (SCF) or c-kit-ligand David Charoy http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K292009 Null Available
SH3 ligand John Dueber http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J62002 Null Planning
SH3 ligand John Dueber http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_J62003 Null Planning



References

  • 1. Minten, I.J., et al., Controlled encapsulation of multiple proteins in virus capsids. J Am Chem Soc, 2009. 131(49): p. 17771-3.
  • 2. Litowski, J.R. and R.S. Hodges, Designing heterodimeric two-stranded alpha-helical coiled-coils. Effects of hydrophobicity and alpha-helical propensity on protein folding, stability, and specificity. J Biol Chem, 2002. 277(40): p. 37272-9.
  • 3. Aguado, G.G.L. Part: BBa_K197022 KILR. 2009 [09/17/2012]; Available from: http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K197022.