Team:UIUC-Illinois/Project/Design

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(One intermediate revision not shown)
Line 165: Line 165:
<tr><td>mCherry + Control Binding Site in Protet plasmid + wild type PUF-PIN in pBAD30 plasmid</td>
<tr><td>mCherry + Control Binding Site in Protet plasmid + wild type PUF-PIN in pBAD30 plasmid</td>
-
<td>This test was to test the effects of the PUF-PIN endonuclease activity on a reporter other than YFP to pinpoint possible problems stemming from a YFP reporter.</td>
+
<td>This test was to test the effects of the PUF-PIN endonuclease activity on a reporter other than YFP to pinpoint possible problems stemming from a YFP reporter. Theoretically, we will see fluorescence.</td>
</tr>
</tr>
     <tr>
     <tr>
       <td>mCherry + Control Binding Site in Protet plasmid+ mutant PUF-PIN in pBAD30 plasmid</td>
       <td>mCherry + Control Binding Site in Protet plasmid+ mutant PUF-PIN in pBAD30 plasmid</td>
-
       <td>This test is to show the specificity of wild type PUF-PIN and mutant PUF-PIN. Theoretically, we will see fluoresce. </td>
+
       <td>This test is to show the specificity of mutant PUF-PIN. Theoretically, we will see fluorescence. </td>
     </tr>
     </tr>

Latest revision as of 21:45, 26 October 2012

Header

Project Design

PUF Project Design

  • Overview
  • PUF+PIN Fusion
  • YFP Reporter
  • Non-Specific Control
  • Experiments
  • Theoretical Results
  • PUF Experimental Design


    In designing our project we based our quantitative tests on fluorescence measured by a plate fluorescence reader. Our constructs were created in ways that best suit providing evidence for our hypothesis of the PUF-PIN fusion protein showing endonuclease activity. Generally, our results were collected from quantifying two main PUF-PIN fusion protein types, a wild type and a mutant type, in different conditions. These two fusion proteins had recognition sites that differed by two base pairs.

    Click on the list to the left to read about each of our constructs and why we decided to do them. All expressions were done in vivo with the DH5a strain of E.Coli on pBAD30 or pPROTet.E plasmids.

    Retrieved from "http://2012.igem.org/Team:UIUC-Illinois/Project/Design"