Team:UIUC-Illinois/Project/Design

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 109: Line 109:
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/7/75/TheoryResults.png"></center><br/>
<center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/7/75/TheoryResults.png"></center><br/>
-
<p>The above chart shows our predicted results. The control binding sites are predicted to bind both wild and mutant PUF-PIN fusion proteins. The only non-expression combinations are when we match a PUF-PIN or *PUF-PIN to it's respective binding site which should result in endonuclease activity and subsequent silencing of the YFP reporter gene.</p><br/>
+
<p>The above chart shows our predicted results. The control binding sites are predicted to bind both wild and mutant PUF-PIN fusion proteins. The only non-expression combinations are when we match a PUF-PIN or *PUF-PIN to it's respective binding site which should result in endonuclease activity and subsequent silencing of the YFP reporter gene.</p>
</div>
</div>

Revision as of 04:45, 29 September 2012

Header

Project Design

Project Design

  • Overview
  • PUF+PIN Fusion
  • YFP Reporter
  • Non-Specific Control
  • Theoretical Results
  • Experimental Design


    In designing our project we based our quantitative tests on fluorescence measured by a plate fluorescence reader. Our constructs were created in ways that best suit providing evidence for our hypothesis of the PUF-PIN fusion protein showing endonuclease activity. Generally, our results were collected from quantifying two main PUF-PIN fusion protein types, a wild type and a mutant type, in different conditions. These two fusion proteins had recognition sites that differed by one base pair.

    Click on the list to the left to read about each of our constructs and why we decided to do them.

    Retrieved from "http://2012.igem.org/Team:UIUC-Illinois/Project/Design"