Team:UC Chile2/Cyanolux/Project

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(30 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{UC_Chile4}}
{{UC_Chile4}}
-
<h1>Motivational drive</h1>
+
<h1>Main Goal</h1>
<p>Natural cycles have always fascinated mankind, probably due to the mysterious mechanisms involved in them and the power they exert in our everyday life. Since the dawn of synthetic biology, engineering oscillatory systems has been a recurrent topic, being Ellowitz's represillator a classical example. Nevertheless, to date no iGEM team has accomplished the implementation of a robust oscillatory system. That will be our challenge for this year's iGEM project.</p>
<p>Natural cycles have always fascinated mankind, probably due to the mysterious mechanisms involved in them and the power they exert in our everyday life. Since the dawn of synthetic biology, engineering oscillatory systems has been a recurrent topic, being Ellowitz's represillator a classical example. Nevertheless, to date no iGEM team has accomplished the implementation of a robust oscillatory system. That will be our challenge for this year's iGEM project.</p>
-
 
<br />
<br />
-
 
<p>To reach our goal we designed a synthethic circuit that links to the endogenous circadian rhythm of <i>Synechocystis PCC6803.</i> As a proof of concept we are going to engineer the first light-rechargeable biological lamp: <i>Synechocystis PCC 6803</i> cells that emit light only by night while recovering and producing the substrates in the day.<b> We strongly believe</b> this will serve as an enabling tool to any project requiring time control over a biological behaviour independently of the user's input.</p>
<p>To reach our goal we designed a synthethic circuit that links to the endogenous circadian rhythm of <i>Synechocystis PCC6803.</i> As a proof of concept we are going to engineer the first light-rechargeable biological lamp: <i>Synechocystis PCC 6803</i> cells that emit light only by night while recovering and producing the substrates in the day.<b> We strongly believe</b> this will serve as an enabling tool to any project requiring time control over a biological behaviour independently of the user's input.</p>
-
 
<br />
<br />
<p>Furthermore, the characterization of this chassis is a fundamental step to explore new systems with minimal inputs to replace <i>E. coli</i>, for example, in the biotechnological industry in order to achieve greener processes.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the characterization of this chassis is a fundamental step to explore new systems with minimal inputs to replace <i>E. coli</i>, for example, in the biotechnological industry in order to achieve greener processes.</p>
-
<h1>Background</h1>
+
<h1>Rationale</h1>
<h2>Synechocystis PCC 6803</h2>
<h2>Synechocystis PCC 6803</h2>
 +
<html><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/2/2c/Synecultureex_uc_chile.jpg" width="290" align="right" style ="margin-left:15px"></html>
<p>Cyanobacteria are prokaryotic photoautotrophs and they are believed to be the only group of organisms to
<p>Cyanobacteria are prokaryotic photoautotrophs and they are believed to be the only group of organisms to
evolve oxygenic photosynthesis about 2.4 billion years ago [[#1|1]]. Although this biochemical breakthrough can’t
evolve oxygenic photosynthesis about 2.4 billion years ago [[#1|1]]. Although this biochemical breakthrough can’t
be understated, several cyanobacteria species also play a crucial role in the planet nitrogen cycle as marine
be understated, several cyanobacteria species also play a crucial role in the planet nitrogen cycle as marine
-
diazotrophs [[#2|2]]. They are found almost in every environment in earth´s surface and interestingly, they
+
diazotrophs [[#2|2]]. Cyanobacteria are found almost in every environment in earth´s surface and interestingly, they
-
are the only prokaryote known to have circadian rhythms, probably accounting for their photosyntethic
+
are one of the few prokaryotes known to have circadian rhythms accounting for their photosyntethic
lifestyle [[#3|3]].</p>
lifestyle [[#3|3]].</p>
<br />
<br />
Line 30: Line 28:
<p>Given the reasons mentioned above, it is of no surprise that <i>Synechocystis PCC6803</i> (among other
<p>Given the reasons mentioned above, it is of no surprise that <i>Synechocystis PCC6803</i> (among other
cyanobacteria) has been extensively used for biotechnological applications and proposed as the “green <i>E.coli</i>”[[#4|4]].</p>
cyanobacteria) has been extensively used for biotechnological applications and proposed as the “green <i>E.coli</i>”[[#4|4]].</p>
 +
 +
<br />
<p>With the dawn of Synthetic Biology, research has made use of <i>Synechocystis</i> for
<p>With the dawn of Synthetic Biology, research has made use of <i>Synechocystis</i> for
commodity chemicals production and detection of water soluble pollutants among other applications[[#5|5]],[[#6|6]].</p>
commodity chemicals production and detection of water soluble pollutants among other applications[[#5|5]],[[#6|6]].</p>
Line 50: Line 50:
<p>The lux operon is a group of genes that are responsible for density-dependent bioluminescent behavior
<p>The lux operon is a group of genes that are responsible for density-dependent bioluminescent behavior
-
in various prokariotic organisms such as <i>Vibrio fischeri</i> and <i>Photorabdus luminescens</i>. In <i>V. fischeri</i>, the operon is composed of 8 genes: LuxA and LuxB encode for the monomers of a heterodimeric luciferase; LuxC, LuxD and LuxE code for fatty acid reductases enzymes and LuxR and LuxI are responsible for the regulation of the whole operon.</p>
+
in various prokariotic organisms such as <i>Vibrio fischeri</i> and <i>Photorabdus luminescens</i> [[#12|12]]. In <i>V. fischeri</i>, the operon is composed of 8 genes: LuxA and LuxB encode for the monomers of a heterodimeric luciferase; LuxC, LuxD and LuxE code for fatty acid reductases enzymes and LuxR and LuxI are responsible for the regulation of the whole operon [[#13|13]].</p>
<br />
<br />
-
 
<p>Lastly LuxG is believed to act as a FMNH2 dependent FADH reductase, although luminescence is barely affected
<p>Lastly LuxG is believed to act as a FMNH2 dependent FADH reductase, although luminescence is barely affected
-
in its absence. The n-decanal ( n= 9 to 14) substrate oxidization to n-decanoic acid by the LuxAB heterodimer is coupled with the reduction of FMNH to FMNH2 and the releasing of oxygen and x photons of light at x wavelength.</p>
+
in its absence [[#14|14]]. The n-decanal ( n= 9 to 14) substrate oxidization to n-decanoic acid by the LuxAB heterodimer is coupled with the reduction of FMNH to FMNH2 and the releasing of oxygen and light.</p>
<br />
<br />
-
 
<p>The carboxylic group of the product is then reduced to aldehyde by CDE proteins allowing the reaction to
<p>The carboxylic group of the product is then reduced to aldehyde by CDE proteins allowing the reaction to
-
start over.</p>
+
start over [[#15|15]].</p>
<br />
<br />
-
 
+
<html>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2012/5/56/Alagain_uc_chile.jpg" width="300" align="left" style ="margin-right:15px"></html>
<p>LuxAB genes have been widely used as reporters dependent on the addition of n-decanal to the culture
<p>LuxAB genes have been widely used as reporters dependent on the addition of n-decanal to the culture
-
media and in 2010, the Cambridge iGEM team engineered LuxABCDEG to an <i>E. coli</i>-optimized biobrick
+
media [[#16|16]] and in 2010, the [https://2010.igem.org/Team:Cambridge Cambridge iGEM team] engineered LuxABCDEG to an <i>E. coli</i>-optimized biobrick
format, uncoupling it from the LuxR and LuxI regulation.</p>
format, uncoupling it from the LuxR and LuxI regulation.</p>
<br />
<br />
Line 69: Line 68:
produced by this pathway is much more visually appealing than other systems from the registry (i.e XFPs),
produced by this pathway is much more visually appealing than other systems from the registry (i.e XFPs),
moreover, the light production doesn´t depend on a single peptide but on a whole pathway involving several genes, which makes it much more tunable, for instance, decoupling in time the substrate recovery from the luciferase reaction itself.</p>
moreover, the light production doesn´t depend on a single peptide but on a whole pathway involving several genes, which makes it much more tunable, for instance, decoupling in time the substrate recovery from the luciferase reaction itself.</p>
-
 
+
<br>
-
 
+
<br>
 +
<br>
<h1>Experimental Strategy</h1>
<h1>Experimental Strategy</h1>
<p>We have devised different strategies to achieve bioluminescence controlled under circadian rhythms. Here we describe the strategies used for building the constructs to reach our goals.</p>
<p>We have devised different strategies to achieve bioluminescence controlled under circadian rhythms. Here we describe the strategies used for building the constructs to reach our goals.</p>
 +
 +
[[File:strategyboard_uc_chile.jpg|600px|center]]
<h2>Splitting the Lux operon and choosing promoters</h2>
<h2>Splitting the Lux operon and choosing promoters</h2>
Line 82: Line 84:
<br />
<br />
-
<p>To try our approach, we selected various promoter which could serve the purpose.  Our rational for selecting candidate promoters involved amplitude of oscillation, peak activity, hour, absence of restriction sites, predicted strength of promoter according to the role of the gene and reproducibility between experiments (based on the literature available).  We looked for promoters which would have peak expression nearby dusk hours and that were slightly out of phase to optimize production of bioluminescence according to our mathematical models <b>(LINK OVER HERE!)</b>. We prioritized promoters from genes that would be involved in central energetic metabolism as we believe that their expression would be most robust and reliable.</p>
+
<p>To try our approach, we selected various promoters which could serve the purpose.  Our rational for selecting candidate promoters involved amplitude of oscillation, peak activity, hour, absence of restriction sites, predicted strength of promoter according to the role of the gene and reproducibility between experiments (based on the literature available).  We looked for promoters which would have peak expression nearby dusk hours and that were slightly out of phase to optimize production of bioluminescence according to our mathematical models <b>(LINK OVER HERE!)</b>. We prioritized promoters from genes that would be involved in central energetic metabolism as we believe that their expression would be most robust and reliable.</p>
<br />
<br />
<p>We choose the transaldolase promoter <b>(specific name here and code in Synechocystis Genome)</b> to direct the expression of the LuxAB genes and we found a couple of other promoters which filled the other requirements from above. Pcaa3 (NAME HERE AND DESCRIPTION OF ENDOGENOUS ACTIVITY) and PsigE (NAME HERE AND DESCRIPTION OF ENDOGENOUS ACTIVITY), the former being already in Biobrick format (courtesy from the Utah team iGEM 2010).
<p>We choose the transaldolase promoter <b>(specific name here and code in Synechocystis Genome)</b> to direct the expression of the LuxAB genes and we found a couple of other promoters which filled the other requirements from above. Pcaa3 (NAME HERE AND DESCRIPTION OF ENDOGENOUS ACTIVITY) and PsigE (NAME HERE AND DESCRIPTION OF ENDOGENOUS ACTIVITY), the former being already in Biobrick format (courtesy from the Utah team iGEM 2010).
Line 89: Line 91:
<h2>Building constructs</h2>
<h2>Building constructs</h2>
<br />
<br />
 +
When confronted with the different available strategies to express the genes from the Lux operon in Synechocystis, we concluded that the one that best suits our need is by using integration plasmids. The reason for this is that the available plasmids that replicate in Synechocystis are very large (8 Kb) without even considering the genes we need to include in the constructs (that would sum up to a final 16 Kb aproximately). Such a large plasmid would prove very difficult to handle through molecular biology techniques, let alone transform Synechocystis.
 +
<br>
 +
Using integration plasmids also proposes an additional advantage, that is to produce successive integrations which allow accumulation of different desirable elements in the genome. Integration in Synechocystis is undergone through double recombination of homologous DNA which also allows interruption of genes if wanted. In our case we have designed our system to produce suceptibility to copper as a biosafety measure to have further control over our recombinant Synechocystis.
-
<p>As transformation in Synechocystis is undergone through double recombination of DNA strands, we designed two constructs that have different recombination locations in the Synechocystis chromosome. </p>
+
<br>
-
<h3>pSB1C3_IntK</h3>
+
We designed two constructs that have different recombination locations in the Synechocystis chromosome. We named them according to what Utah iGEM team from 2010 proposed for [https://2010.igem.org/Construction_usu.html#Integration_Plasmid_Construction naming conventions]:
 +
 
 +
<h3>pSB1C3_IntK</h3> [http://partsregistry.org/Part:BBa_K743006 BBa_K743006]
 +
<p>This construct is an integrative plasmid which targets neutral recombination sites (slr0370 and sll0337). We selected this locus because it has been extensively used in the literature ([[#11| 11]]) and it shown to have no deleterious effects on Synechocystis viability. We selected Kanamycin resistance as our selectable marker. [PUT LINK TO CONSTRUCT HERE].</p>
 +
<br>
 +
Using this backbone we have decided to put LuxAB under the transaldolase promoter.We have choose the transaldolase promoter to express the luciferase part of the operon, as in the literature the promoter is described as having a peak of expression at 2 hours past dusk, which we believe is just the right timing to "turn on the lamp".
 +
<br>
 +
 
 +
We've found 2 versions of the bacterial luciferase which we will use on this construct. The first one is of <i>Photorhabdus luminiscent</i> K216008 from the 2009 Edinburgh iGEM team and the second one is part from the LuxBrick (K325909 from the 2010 Cambridge iGEM team) and originally comes from <i>Vibrio fisherii</i> but has been "E.coli optimized".
 +
 
 +
<h3>pSB1A3_IntC (Utah 2010 iGEM Team integration plasmid)</h3>
<br />
<br />
-
<p>The first of our constructs is an integrative plasmid which targets neutral recombination sites (slr0370 and slr03770 DOUBLECHECK this). We selected this locus because it has been extensively used in the literature (CAPAZ EXAGERE?) and it shown to have no deleterious effects on Synechocystis viability. We selected Kanamycin resistance as our transformation marker. [PUT LINK TO CONSTRUCT HERE].</p>
+
<p>We plan on using this plasmid to express the LuxCDEG contructs under the regulation of the Pcaa3 and PsigE promoters mentioned above. [http://partsregistry.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K390200 pSB1A3_IntC].</p>
 +
 
<h3>pSB1C3_IntS</h3>
<h3>pSB1C3_IntS</h3>
<br />
<br />
-
<p>We designed another construct that besides serving as a double recombination plasmid it makes Synechocystis susceptible to copper concentrations higher than X uM [[#10|10]]. We have designed this construct to interrupt the CopS gene as a biosafety measure to avoid the possibility of having a leakage of recombinant DNA to the environment. This plasmid has Spectynomycin resistance as the transformation marker. [PUT LINK TO CONSTRUCT HERE]
+
<p>Due to issues mentioned in the results page (PUT LINK HERE) we designed a new plasmid backbone.
 +
This is an integration plasmid which makes Synechocystis susceptible to copper concentrations higher than 0.75 uM [[#10|10]] by disrupting the CopS gene. We believe that this strategy serves as a biosafety measure to avoid the possibility of having a leakage of recombinant DNA to the environment. The plasmid uses Spectynomycin as a selectable marker. [PUT LINK TO CONSTRUCT HERE]
</p>
</p>
-
 
+
We plan on expressing LuxCDEG under the control of the promoters Pcaa3 and PsigE (mentioned above). These promoters have peak activities 1 hour before dusk. We believe that we might enhance bioluminescence yield initially by setting the substrate production/regeneration part of the operon prior to the expression of the luciferase.(LINK TO MODELLING?)
-
<h3>pSB1A2_IntC (Utah 2010 iGEM Team integration plasmid)</h3>
+
-
<br />
+
-
<p>Alternatively, we designed our LuxCDEG contructs for the Utah 2010 iGEM Team plasmid backbone pSB1A2_IntC. [PUT LINK TO CONSTRUCT HERE].</p>
+
<h1>References</h1>
<h1>References</h1>
<div id="1">
<div id="1">
-
(1) Evolution of photosynthesis. Hohmann-Marriott MF, Blankenship. Annual Review of Plant Biology Vol. 62: 515-548
+
(1) Hohmann-Marriott MF, Blankenship.(2011). Evolution of photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Biology Vol. 62: 515-548
</div>
</div>
<br />
<br />
<div id="2">
<div id="2">
-
(2) Nitrogen fixation by marine cyanobacteria. Jonathan P. Zehr. Trends in microbiology, Volume 19, Issue 4,
+
(2) Jonathan P. Zehr. (2011) Nitrogen fixation by marine cyanobacteria. Trends in microbiology, Vol. 19, 162–17
-
April 2011, Pages 162–17
+
</div>
</div>
<br />
<br />
<div id="3">
<div id="3">
-
(3) Carl Hirschie Johnson and Susan S. Golden. CIRCADIAN PROGRAMS IN CYANOBACTERIA: Adaptiveness
+
(3) Carl Hirschie Johnson and Susan S. Golden.(1999). CIRCADIAN PROGRAMS IN CYANOBACTERIA: Adaptiveness
-
and Mechanism. Annual Review of Microbiology, Vol. 53: 389-409
+
and Mechanism. Annual Review of Microbiology, Vol. 53, 389-409
</div><br />
</div><br />
<div id="4">
<div id="4">
(4) Ducat, D. C., Way, J. C., & Silver, P. a. (2011). Engineering cyanobacteria to generate high-value products.
(4) Ducat, D. C., Way, J. C., & Silver, P. a. (2011). Engineering cyanobacteria to generate high-value products.
-
Trends in biotechnology, 29(2), 95-103.
+
Trends in biotechnology, Vol. 29, 95-103.
</div><br />
</div><br />
Line 130: Line 143:
(5) Huang, H.-H., Camsund, D., Lindblad, P., & Heidorn, T. (2010). Design and characterization of molecular
(5) Huang, H.-H., Camsund, D., Lindblad, P., & Heidorn, T. (2010). Design and characterization of molecular
tools for a Synthetic Biology approach towards developing cyanobacterial biotechnology. Nucleic acids
tools for a Synthetic Biology approach towards developing cyanobacterial biotechnology. Nucleic acids
-
research, 38(8), 2577-93
+
research, 38, 2577-93.
</div><br />
</div><br />
Line 136: Line 149:
<div id="6">
<div id="6">
(6) Peca, L., Kós, P. B., Máté, Z., Farsang, A., & Vass, I. (2008). Construction of bioluminescent cyanobacterial
(6) Peca, L., Kós, P. B., Máté, Z., Farsang, A., & Vass, I. (2008). Construction of bioluminescent cyanobacterial
-
reporter strains for detection of nickel, cobalt and zinc. FEMS microbiology letters, 289(2), 258-64.
+
reporter strains for detection of nickel, cobalt and zinc. FEMS microbiology letters, 289, 258-64.
</div><br />
</div><br />
Line 148: Line 161:
<div id="8">
<div id="8">
(8) Layana, C., & Diambra, L. (2011). Time-course analysis of cyanobacterium transcriptome: detecting
(8) Layana, C., & Diambra, L. (2011). Time-course analysis of cyanobacterium transcriptome: detecting
-
oscillatory genes. PloS one, 6(10), e26291.
+
oscillatory genes. PloS one, 6, e26291.
</div><br />
</div><br />
Line 154: Line 167:
(9) Kunert, a, Hagemann, M., & Erdmann, N. (2000). Construction of promoter probe vectors for
(9) Kunert, a, Hagemann, M., & Erdmann, N. (2000). Construction of promoter probe vectors for
Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 using the light-emitting reporter systems Gfp and LuxAB. Journal of
Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 using the light-emitting reporter systems Gfp and LuxAB. Journal of
-
microbiological methods, 41(3), 185-94.
+
microbiological methods, 41, 185-94.
</div><br />
</div><br />
<div id="10">
<div id="10">
-
(10)Giner-Lamia, J., Lopez-Maury, L., Reyes, J. C., & Florencio, F. J. (2012). The CopRS two-component system is responsible for resistance to copper in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Plant physiology, 159(August), 1806-1818.
+
(10)Giner-Lamia, J., Lopez-Maury, L., Reyes, J. C., & Florencio, F. J. (2012). The CopRS two-component system is responsible for resistance to copper in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Plant physiology, 159, 1806-1818.
</div>
</div>
-
 
+
<br>
 +
<div id="11">
 +
(11)Kucho, K., Aoki, K., Itoh, S., & Ishiura, M., (2005). Improvement of the bioluminescence reporter system for real-time monitoring of circadian rhythms in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803. Genes Genet. Syst.  80, p. 19–23
 +
</div>
 +
<div id="12">
 +
(12)Meighen, E. a. (1991). Molecular biology of bacterial bioluminescence. Microbiological reviews, 55(1), 123-42.
 +
</div>
 +
<div id="13">
 +
(13)Dunlap, P. V. (1999). Quorum regulation of luminescence in Vibrio fischeri. Journal of molecular microbiology and biotechnology, 1(1), 5-12.
 +
</div>
 +
<div id="14">
 +
(14)Luciferase, R. (2001). Differential Transfers of Reduced Flavin Cofactor and Product by Bacterial Flavin. Society, 1749-1754.
 +
</div>
 +
<div id="15">
 +
(15) Kelly, C. J., Hsiung, C.-J., & Lajoie, C. a. (2003). Kinetic analysis of bacterial bioluminescence. Biotechnology and bioengineering, 81(3), 370-8. doi:10.1002/bit.10475
 +
</div>
 +
<div id="16">
 +
(16)Tehrani, G. A., Mirzaahmadi, S., Bandehpour, M., & Laloei, F. (2011). Molecular cloning and expression of the luciferase coding genes of Vibrio fischeri. Journal of Biotechnology, 10(20), 4018-4023. doi:10.5897/AJB10.2363
{{UC_Chilefooter}}
{{UC_Chilefooter}}

Latest revision as of 22:52, 25 September 2012

Project: Luxilla - Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, iGEM 2012