Team:Tianjin/Project/Technology

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Advantages and Disadvantages)
(MAGE)
 
(5 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 66: Line 66:
         </div>
         </div>
         <div class="menu_children">
         <div class="menu_children">
-
<a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Tianjin/Project/Gene">Safety Encryption</a>
+
<a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Tianjin/Project/Regulation">Logic Metabolism Regulation</a>
         </div>
         </div>
         <div class="menu_children">
         <div class="menu_children">
-
<a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Tianjin/Project/Regulation">Logic Metabolism Regulation</a>
+
<a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:Tianjin/Project/Gene">Future Work</a>
         </div>
         </div>
         <div class="menu_children">
         <div class="menu_children">
Line 77: Line 77:
<p class="menu_head">In this page</p>
<p class="menu_head">In this page</p>
<div class="menu_body">
<div class="menu_body">
 +
        <div class="menu_children">
 +
<a href="#Replace_of_RBS_in_Plasmid">Replace of RBS in Plasmid</a>
 +
        </div>
         <div class="menu_children">
         <div class="menu_children">
<a href="#Yeast_Assembler">Yeast Assembler</a>
<a href="#Yeast_Assembler">Yeast Assembler</a>
Line 95: Line 98:
=Replace of RBS in Plasmid=
=Replace of RBS in Plasmid=
[[file:TJU2012-Proj-LMR-fig-21.png|thumb|500px|center|'''Figure 1.''' The process of introducing the O-RBS to plasmid (from TJU iGEM Team 2012)]]
[[file:TJU2012-Proj-LMR-fig-21.png|thumb|500px|center|'''Figure 1.''' The process of introducing the O-RBS to plasmid (from TJU iGEM Team 2012)]]
-
Here, how did we introduce the O-Lock, we just use two primers to build two primers. Those two primers have about 20bp overhands on their 5' end, which contain the O-Lock or other mutations. Then we directly transform those PCR products to E. coli by electroporation-mediated method. E. coli could cyclize those PCR products and form the complete plasmid.
+
Here, how did we introduce the O-Lock, we just use two primers to build pcr. Those two primers have about 20bp overhands on their 5' end, which contain the O-Locks or other mutations. Then we directly transform those PCR products to E. coli by electroporation-mediated method. Then those PCR productions could cyclize and form the complete plasmids.
=Yeast Assembler=
=Yeast Assembler=
Line 150: Line 153:
===Completely Synthesizing the Genome of Mycoplasma Genitalium using Yeast Assembler===
===Completely Synthesizing the Genome of Mycoplasma Genitalium using Yeast Assembler===
In 2008, Gibson from the J. Craig Venter Institute, published an article “one-step assembly in Yeast of 25 overlapping DNA fragments to form a complete synthetic Mycoplasma genitalium genome”. In the article, the author transformed 25 overlapping DNA fragments into Yeast, homologous recombination occurs, and then the whole genome is synthesized.
In 2008, Gibson from the J. Craig Venter Institute, published an article “one-step assembly in Yeast of 25 overlapping DNA fragments to form a complete synthetic Mycoplasma genitalium genome”. In the article, the author transformed 25 overlapping DNA fragments into Yeast, homologous recombination occurs, and then the whole genome is synthesized.
-
[[file:TJU2012-Proj-LMR-fig-6.png|thumb|500px|center|'''Figure 6.''' Synthetic Mycoplasma genitalium genome (from "One-step assembly in yeast of 25 overlapping DNA fragments to form a complete synthetic ''Mycoplasma genitalium'' genome")]]
+
[[file:TJU2012-Proj-LMR-fig-6.png|thumb|500px|center|'''Figure 5.''' Synthetic Mycoplasma genitalium genome (from "One-step assembly in yeast of 25 overlapping DNA fragments to form a complete synthetic ''Mycoplasma genitalium'' genome")]]
Construction of a synthetic M. genitalium genome in yeast. Yeast cells were transformed with 25 different overlapping A-series DNA segments (blue arrows; ~17 kb to35 kb each) composing the M. genitalium genome. To assemble these into a complete genome, a single yeast cell (tan) must take up at least one representative of the 25 different DNA fragments and incorporate them in the nucleus (yellow), where homologous recombination occurs. This assembled genome, called JCVI-1.1, is 590,011 bp, including the vector sequence (red triangle) shown internal to A86 – 89.
Construction of a synthetic M. genitalium genome in yeast. Yeast cells were transformed with 25 different overlapping A-series DNA segments (blue arrows; ~17 kb to35 kb each) composing the M. genitalium genome. To assemble these into a complete genome, a single yeast cell (tan) must take up at least one representative of the 25 different DNA fragments and incorporate them in the nucleus (yellow), where homologous recombination occurs. This assembled genome, called JCVI-1.1, is 590,011 bp, including the vector sequence (red triangle) shown internal to A86 – 89.
=MAGE=
=MAGE=
-
We thought that now that we could introduce O-Lock cell, could we introduce O-Lock to the whole system. Theoretically speaking, we could make it come true because there is a technology called MAGE (Multiplex Automated Genomic Engineering) which comes from Harvard University. We could use this technology to replace all the N-RBS to O-RBS of the genomic. Then we could regulate the metabolic network more freely and accurately by many AND gates which come from the O-Locks.
+
We thought that now that we could introduce O-Lock into a cell, could we introduce O-Lock to the whole system. Theoretically speaking, we could make it come true because there is a technology called MAGE (Multiplex Automated Genomic Engineering) which comes from Harvard University. We could use this technology to replace all the N-RBS to O-RBS of the genome. Then we could regulate the metabolic network more freely and accurately by many AND gates which come from the O-Locks.
-
[[file:TJU2012-Proj-LMR-fig-22.png|thumb|500px|center|'''Figure 2.''' The basic principle of MAGE (from TJU iGEM Team 2012)]]
+
[[file:TJU2012-Proj-LMR-fig-22.png|thumb|500px|center|'''Figure 6.''' The basic principle of MAGE (from TJU iGEM Team 2012)]]
{{:Team:Tianjin/footer}}
{{:Team:Tianjin/footer}}

Latest revision as of 01:18, 27 October 2012


Technology


Replace of RBS in Plasmid

Figure 1. The process of introducing the O-RBS to plasmid (from TJU iGEM Team 2012)

Here, how did we introduce the O-Lock, we just use two primers to build pcr. Those two primers have about 20bp overhands on their 5' end, which contain the O-Locks or other mutations. Then we directly transform those PCR products to E. coli by electroporation-mediated method. Then those PCR productions could cyclize and form the complete plasmids.

Yeast Assembler

History

Yeast Assembler is based on in vivo homologous recombination in yeast. As for its high efficiency and ease to work with, in vivo homologous recombination in yeast has been widely used for gene cloning, plasmid construction and library creation. In the early of 2008, Zengyi Shao from University of lllinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, used such a method to construct biochemical pathways. Such a method, for its high efficiency in assembling multiple genes, received great popularity since its appearance.

The Difficulty of Large Fragments Assembly

The general digestion connection will leave scar and will be limited by the specific cleavage sequences.

Figure 2. Enzyme digestion (from the website of dnaQ

Long PCR fragment will suffer the decline of success rate and distortion, etc.

Figure 3. PCR Recombinant & PCR Machine (from the website of dnaQ

However, the construction of some large fragments cannot be avoided, so the development of a low-cost, simple operation, good fidelity, a little limiting factor large DNA fragment assembly method is particularly important.

Principles

One step assembly into a vector.

Figure 4. Principles of Yeast assembler (from "DNA assembler, an in vivo genetic method for rapid construction of biochemical pathways")

When parts are transformed all parts into Yeast, homologous recombination occurs at the site “x”, and then all little parts are integrated into a vector.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Compared with other methods,the “Yeast assembler” are more efficient and useful for large gene assemble.

Table 1. Advantages compared to the other two methods (from TJU iGEM Team 2012)

  Yeast Assembler SLIC Domino Method
Advantages High efficient, Fit for large gene assemble rapid Fit for many little parts into overall Fit for two large gene parts integration
Disadvatages Process is complex Success rate is low, The size of recombinant is relatively small(<8kb) Require a great amount of time and labor. Process is sequential

Completely Synthesizing the Genome of Mycoplasma Genitalium using Yeast Assembler

In 2008, Gibson from the J. Craig Venter Institute, published an article “one-step assembly in Yeast of 25 overlapping DNA fragments to form a complete synthetic Mycoplasma genitalium genome”. In the article, the author transformed 25 overlapping DNA fragments into Yeast, homologous recombination occurs, and then the whole genome is synthesized.

Figure 5. Synthetic Mycoplasma genitalium genome (from "One-step assembly in yeast of 25 overlapping DNA fragments to form a complete synthetic Mycoplasma genitalium genome")

Construction of a synthetic M. genitalium genome in yeast. Yeast cells were transformed with 25 different overlapping A-series DNA segments (blue arrows; ~17 kb to35 kb each) composing the M. genitalium genome. To assemble these into a complete genome, a single yeast cell (tan) must take up at least one representative of the 25 different DNA fragments and incorporate them in the nucleus (yellow), where homologous recombination occurs. This assembled genome, called JCVI-1.1, is 590,011 bp, including the vector sequence (red triangle) shown internal to A86 – 89.

MAGE

We thought that now that we could introduce O-Lock into a cell, could we introduce O-Lock to the whole system. Theoretically speaking, we could make it come true because there is a technology called MAGE (Multiplex Automated Genomic Engineering) which comes from Harvard University. We could use this technology to replace all the N-RBS to O-RBS of the genome. Then we could regulate the metabolic network more freely and accurately by many AND gates which come from the O-Locks.

Figure 6. The basic principle of MAGE (from TJU iGEM Team 2012)