Team:TU-Delft/Modeling

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(305 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
{{:Team:TUDelft/Scripts}}{{:Team:TUDelft/CSS}}{{:Team:TUDelft/menu}}
+
{{:Team:TUDelft/Scripts}}{{:Team:TUDelft/CSSLaksh}}{{:Team:TUDelft/menu}}
 +
<html>
 +
<head><title>Human Outreach</title></head>
 +
<body>
 +
<div style="height:50px; width:105%;"></div>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/7/74/Background_greenlamp.jpg" class="bg_team"></img>
 +
<div id="logo_ed"><a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:TU-Delft" 'onfocus=this.blur()'><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/8/88/Logoigemklein.png" border="0" width="100" height="100"></a></div>
 +
<div id="contentbox" style="text-align:justify;">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/igem.org/d/d6/Modelingnieuw.jpg" align="middle" width="100%">
 +
</div>
 +
</body></html>
 +
<div id="contentbox" style="text-align:justify;">
 +
 +
__TOC__
 +
__NOEDITSECTION__
 +
 +
= Overview =
 +
 +
We decided to use the modeling expertise of the team members to achieve three key objectives for our project.
 +
 +
* Develop scientific understanding of the yeast pheromone response pathway.
 +
* Test the effects of the changes to the system.
 +
* Aid decision making in the laboratory.
 +
 +
To achieve the stated objectives, we adopted a hierarchical modeling approach, in which we constructed heterogeneous models spanning
 +
 +
* population dynamics (diffusion model).
 +
* extra-cellular interactions (structural model).
 +
* intra-cellular dynamics (pathway model).
 +
 +
== Connected Multi-level Models ==
 +
[[File:Scheme of Multi-layer models.JPEG|580px|right|thumb|'''Figure 1''': Scheme of Multi-level models.]]
 +
 +
These three models interact with each other to represent the mechanism of our project in different perspectives. At the system level, '''diffusion model''' sheds light on the behaviour of the proposed device the Snifferometer, incorporating the observations obtained from the single cell pathway model. At a lower level, the '''pathway model''' is built to functionally simulate the intra-cellular biochemical reactions in the signalling pathway. Parameters in pathway were fitted to the experimental data so as to provide a good estimate of the concentration of the Green Fluoroscent Protein. At a still lower level, the '''structural model''' was designed to understand the ligand docking at the molecular level. It indicates how well the ligand-receptor interaction is due to hydrogen bonds, which gives an insight into the receptor activation rate in the pathway model. Further research on the ligand-receptor model may provide more knowledge about ligand affinity and G-protein release.
 +
 +
Based on these models, a practical device, Snifferometer is designed to achieve the purpose of odor detection. The model of this device is developed to give an idea of the application of our project.
 +
 +
The models that were built spanned a broad spectrum of '''techniques: PDE, MD (Molecular Dynamics), SDE and ODE, as well as alignment techniques''', with '''diverse tools''' being employed for the application of these techniques: '''COMSOL, YASARA, MATLAB, COPASI, BLAST, ClustalO, Ensembl, PSIPRED.'''
 +
 +
== Research Cycle ==
 +
This research cycle is introduced in our project as an interactive boundary between the wetlab and the "dry" modeling to gain a hierarchical in-depth understanding of our biological system. [1]
 +
 +
[[File:Model-Experiment Cycle.png|350px|right|thumb|'''Figure 2''': Model-Experiment Cycle.]]
 +
 +
''Four basic phases'' are sequenced to close the cycle, as shows in Figure 2.
 +
 +
'''First''', model hypotheses for the signal transduction and the ligand-binding structure are proposed based on the biological expertise, the literature surveys on the related databases.
 +
 +
'''Second''', due to the inadequate descriptions of dynamics and lack of information, more analysis of the hypothesized models were done to investigate the properties of models such as the parameter sensitivities and the structural stability in pathway model.
 +
 +
'''Third''', The experimental design was aided by the initial analysis of the models. A 2D spatio-temporal model of the proposed device was also implemented to aid the conceptualization of the Snifferometer.
 +
 +
'''Finally''', the measured data from "wet" experiment, in turn, modified the final set of parameters to provide a more accurate description of the pathway.
 +
 +
As a result of the research cycle, a model validated by data was obtained which was used to predict the outcomes of the experiments, using which different conditions could be simulated by "cheap" computations ''in silco'' instead of the time-consuming experiments.
 +
 +
 +
 +
<div>
 +
= Structural Model =
 +
 +
In order to engineer a yeast strain that is able to detect a tuberculosis molecule (TB), its receptor should be designed [[File:Receptorcolor.png|150px|left|thumb|'''Figure 3''': Niacin receptor embedded in membrane.]]in such a way that the molecule can act as an agonist. By modeling the olfactory receptor ''in silico'' by means of Molecular Dynamics simulations (MD), its biophysical and biochemical properties are investigated at the molecular level. The aim is to get a clear understanding of how a ligand binds in the receptor and how to mutate the binding niche to let it bind to methyl nicotinate more specifically. A strong correlation between ''in vivo'' activity of the Homo Sapiens niacin receptor 1 and the simulated activity from the model resulted, enabling the prediction of ligand characteristics in the binding niche. 
 +
</div>
 +
 +
<div>
<html>
<html>
-
<h1>Project Overview</h1>
+
<a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:TU-Delft/Modeling/StructuralModeling" align="right">More Details&nbsp;&nbsp;<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/3/36/Right_arrow.png" width="60" height="60"></a>
-
<h3>Introduction</h3>
+
</html>
-
<p>
+
</div>
-
For this year’s iGEM competition the Aberdeen team has worked on developing a translationally controlled toggle switch embedded in yeast.<a href="#ref1"><sup style="font-size:10px">[1]</sup></a> Genetic toggle switches are a vital component for synthetic biology circuits , enabling functional control of biological functions. The majority of toggle switches used for iGEM are embedded in Escherichia coli and can only be controlled at the transcriptional level <a href="#ref2"><sup style="font-size:10px">[2]</sup></a><sup style="font-size:10px">,</sup><a href="#ref3"><sup style="font-size:10px">[3]</sup></a>. Our main goal was to create and model a novel gene circuit, wherein yeast cells can be switched between mutually exclusive fluorescent proteins under exposure to environmental factors.  This switching behaviour would be regulated at the translational level, an innovation over previous systems that only demonstrated transcriptional regulation <a href="#ref4"><sup style="font-size:10px">[4]</sup></a><sup style="font-size:10px">,</sup><a href="#ref5"><sup style="font-size:10px">[5]</sup></a>.The novel genetic toggle switch operated by controlling gene expression at the translational level consisted of two gene expression constructs expressing an RNA-binding protein fused to either Green (GFP) or Cyan (CFP) fluorescent protein in the presence of appropriate inducer. When co-expressed in yeast, these translational fusions would be mutually inhibitory at the translational level, thereby forming a biological, ‘Toggle Switch’ system.
+
-
</p>
+
-
<br>
+
-
<hr>
+
-
<h3>The AyeSwitch</h3>
+
-
<p>The toggle switch is shown by Fig 1 and was named the ‘AyeSwitch’. It is regulated by controlling the two constructs, GAL1p-[Npeptide-GFP] and CUP1p-[MS2-CFP], via inducible yeast promoters GAL1 or CUP1 in the presence or absence of galactose and Cu2+ ions respectively.
+
-
</p>
+
-
<center>
+
-
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/f/ff/Toggle_switch.jpg">
+
-
</center>
+
-
<br>
+
-
<p>
+
-
For example, in the presence of galactose only, GAL1 is induced and there is expression of N-peptide-GFP protein. The subsequent addition of Cu2+ then induces the transcription of mRNA coding for MS2 coat binding protein and CFP. In addition to this, the mRNA also codes for a Bbox stem loop sequence that can be bound by N-peptide. </p>
+
-
<p><br>
+
-
Ideally, there is initial inhibition of MS2-CFP translation by Npeptide-GFP binding to the Bbox stem loop. Evolution of time corresponds to the ratio of MS2-CFP mRNA to N-peptide-GFP protein increasing allowing some MS2-CFP to be produced until CFP ‘switches ON’ as it gains dominance over GFP.</p>
+
-
<p>
+
-
Additionally, N-peptide-GFP protein translation can also be inhibited by MS2-CFP via MS2 protein binding to the MS2 stem loops on the N-peptide-GFP mRNA. This may help the switching ON of CFP and also means GFP would face a similar situation if the inducer was changed from Cu2+ to galactose.</p>
+
-
<p><br>
+
-
However, additional variables may come into play affecting the outcomes described above. It is likely that the concentration of each inducer present, the translational rate and binding efficiency of stem loop binding proteins to mRNA stem loop and degradation rate of proteins can also affect the outcome. Reversing the order of inducer present may also affect the outcome. </p>
+
-
<br>
+
-
<br>
+
-
<h3>Experimental Characterisation of the AyeSwitch</h3>
+
-
<p>
+
-
The experimental work addressed these issues by initially characterising the promoters in terms of their dose response and time response using constructs GAL1-[GFP] and CUP1-[GFP]. These experiments were then extended to characterise GAL1p-[Npeptide-GFP] and CUP1p-[MS2-CFP] which discovered that CUP1p-[MS2-CFP] did not function as expected.</p><br>
+
-
<p>
+
-
The experimental work diverged from this point to troubleshoot CUP1p-[MS2-CFP], investigating the translation inhibition of GAL1p-[Npeptide-GFP] by MS2 coat protein using construct MET17p - [MS2], Bio-brick construction and testing of Bio-brick E2050 mOrange.</p>
+
-
<br>
+
-
<br>
+
-
<h3>Modelling Characterisation of the Ayeswitch</h3>
+
-
<p>
+
-
Our team proposed a novel model to describe the functioning of the Aye-switch, based on ordinary differential equations (ODEs). The proposed system of ODEs was carefully and systematically studied both analytically and computationally. A bifurcation analysis was performed and the bistability of the system was investigated with respect to large variations in the parameters of the system. The deterministic simulations were compared with stochastic ones, using the Gillespie algorithm. The parameter space of the model was thoroughly investigated, using two different approaches: Monte-Carlo and directed evolution. These two approaches are very useful for a wide range of projects in synthetic biology. The theoretical predictions led to the  proposition of optimised parameters for the Aye-switch that allow a very robust translational switch.</p>
+
-
<br>
+
-
<br>
+
-
<h3>Troubleshooting CUP1p-[MS2-CFP]</h3>
+
-
<p>
+
-
Troubleshooting of CUP1p-[MS2-CFP] was carried out through a series of gene cassette replacement experiments testing the promoter and CFP sequences for functionality. The conclusions to these experiments suggest that the Bbox Stem loop, usually located in the 3’untranslated region but is in the 5’ untranslated region of our construct may be preventing the expression of downstream proteins. It may also be that the fusion of MS2 to CFP results in inappropriate protein folding, inhibiting expression.</p>
+
-
<br>
+
-
<br>
+
-
<h3>Verification of Translation Inhibition as a Regulatory Mechanism</h3>
+
-
<p>
+
-
It was shown that the translational inhibition of GAL1p-[Npeptide-GFP] by MS2 coat protein was possible, confirming that translational regulation is viable. Further work if time permitted would investigate if this inhibition could work in the context of a toggle switch.</p>
+
-
<br>
+
-
<br>
+
-
<h3>Bio-brick construction and testing </h3>
+
-
<p>
+
-
In parallel, Bio-bricks were constructed and submitted to the Registry of parts whilst testing of the Bio-brick E2050 mOrange using fluorimetry and FACS analysis lead to the conclusion that the mOrange sequence did not function within our GAL1p-[Npeptide-GFP] construct that was shown to be able to express GFP appropriately. </p>
+
-
<br><br>
+
-
<hr>
+
-
<h1>Attribution and Contributions</h1>
+
<div>
-
<h3>Biological circuit construction and testing </h3>
+
= Pathway Model =
-
<p>
+
-
The students within the experimental section of the team were provided (by their host lab) with two yeast strains that had Gal1p-GFP and Cup1p-GFP integrated into the genome (see 'DNA constructs). They then used these constructs to analyse the properties of the CUP1 and GAL1 promoters. With some instructor oversight, the student team themselves then completely designed constructs Gal1p-(Npep-GFP) and Cup1p-(MS2-CFP), which were then synthesised by a synthetic DNA supply company. The students then tested these constructs, and further engineered them during the trouble-shooting phase of the project.<br>
+
-
All the experimental work described on the wiki, involving characterisation, testing and re-engineering of the bio-bricks, was carried out by the student members of the team. All the construction and sequencing of the four submitted bio-bricks was also carried out by members of the student team.
+
-
<br><br>
+
-
<h3>Mathematical modelling of the AyeSwitch </h3>
+
The bio-chemical pathway model was developed based on a scheme favouring the temporal order of the processes, which involved the four fundamental modules,[[File:SniffSchematic.png|300px|right|thumb|'''Figure 4''': Schematic representation of the pathway model.]]
-
<p>
+
-
The students within the theoretical section of the team carried out all the described modelling. Team activities were overseen by the Instructors, but all model coding and model analysis was performed by the students within the team.
+
-
<br><br>
+
* Receptor Activation
-
<hr>
+
* G - Protein Cycle
-
<h3> References</h3><br>
+
* MAPK Cascade
-
<p>
+
* Gene Expression
-
<a name="ref1"></a>
+
 
-
<a href="http://www.nature.com/msb/journal/v2/n1/full/msb4100073.html"target="_blank"><b><sup style="font-size:10px">[1]</sup></b></a> Ernesto Andrianantoandro et al. Synthetic biology: new engineering rules for an emerging discipline Molecular Systems Biology 2:2006.0028</p><br>
+
Three different models were used for the analysis of different aspects of the pathway. The dynamics of the system in these models were described using a set of differential equations governing the concentration changes of individual components and of complexes over time.
-
<p>
+
 
-
<a name="ref2"></a>
+
Sensitivity and stability analysis were permformed to determine the sensitivity coefficients which were used to study the parametric dependence of the biological models. The results from the sensitivity analysis were then used in the parameter estimation to fit the model to the data provided by the experimentalists.
-
<a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v403/n6767/abs/403339a0.html"target="_blank"><b><sup style="font-size:10px">[2]</sup></b></a> Timothy S. Gardner et al. Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli Nature 403, 339-342 (20 January 2000)</p><br>
+
</div>
-
<p>
+
 
-
<a name="ref3"></a>
+
<div>
-
<a href="http://www.cell.com/retrieve/pii/S0092867403003465"target="_blank"><b><sup style="font-size:10px">[3]</sup></b></a> Mariette R. Atkinson et al. Development of Genetic Circuitry Exhibiting Toggle Switch or Oscillatory Behavior in Escherichia coli Cell, Volume 113, Issue 5, 597-607, 30 May 2003 </p><br>
+
<html>
-
<p>
+
<a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:TU-Delft/Modeling/SingleCellModel" align="right">More Details&nbsp;&nbsp;<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/3/36/Right_arrow.png" width="60" height="60"></a>
-
<a name="ref4"></a>
+
</html>
-
<a href="http://www.nature.com/emboj/journal/v17/n14/abs/7591108a.html"target="_blank"><b><sup style="font-size:10px">[4]</sup></b></a> Adam Platt and Richard J Reece The yeast galactose genetic switch is mediated by the formation of a Gal4p–Gal80p–Gal3p complex The EMBO Journal (1998) 17, 4086 - 4091 </p><br>
+
</div>
-
<p>
+
 
-
<a name="ref5"></a>
+
<div>
-
<a href="http://www.pnas.org/content/88/19/8597.abstract"target="_blank"><b><sup style="font-size:10px">[5]</sup></b></a> D W Griggs and M Johnston Regulated expression of the GAL4 activator gene in yeast provides a sensitive genetic switch for glucose repression PNAS October 1, 1991 vol. 88 no. 19 8597-8601</i></p>
+
 
-
<br>
+
= Diffusion Model =
-
<hr>
+
[[File:convectionsniff.png|250px|left|thumb|'''Figure 5''': The convection based model of the Snifferometer]]
-
<table class="nav">
+
One of the main objectives of the project was to synthesize a practical device for the detector This led to the design of a three layered device, The Snifferometer.
-
<tr>
+
 
-
<td>
+
As a first step towards achieving this goal, we built a temporal model of the system using PDE's which were simulated in matlab. A 2D reaction-diffusion system was then implemented in COMSOL multiphysics using the knowledge obtained from single cell pathway model, combining the behaviours of the which helped us get a better understanding of how such a device could be implemented and the response times involved in such a process.
-
<a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Aberdeen_Scotland"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/8/8e/Left_arrow.png">&nbsp;&nbsp;Return to Home Page</a>
+
</div>
-
</td>
+
 
-
<td align="right">
+
<div>
-
<a href="https://2010.igem.org/Team:Aberdeen_Scotland/Team">Continue to iGEM at Aberdeen&nbsp;&nbsp;<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/3/36/Right_arrow.png"></a>
+
<html>
-
</td>
+
<a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:TU-Delft/Modeling/Diffusion" align="right">More Details&nbsp;&nbsp;<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/3/36/Right_arrow.png" width="60" height="60"></a>
-
</tr>
+
</html>
-
</table>
+
</div>
 +
 
 +
<div>
 +
= Stochastic Model - Sensitivity & Specificity Analysis =
 +
[[File:IdealDevice1.png|250px|right|thumb|'''Figure 6''': The convection based model of the Snifferometer]]
 +
A false positive and false negative analysis is a crucial aspect of a  binary classification test such as the snifferomenter, as it indicates the confidence level in the data that one should typically strive for. On account of the inherent stochasticity in biological functions, we built a stochastic model to analyze the Sensitivity and the Specificity of the Snifferometer.
 +
</div>
 +
 
 +
<div>
 +
<html>
 +
<a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:TU-Delft/Modeling/StochasticSensitivitySpecificityAnalysis" align="right">More Details&nbsp;&nbsp;<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/3/36/Right_arrow.png" width="60" height="60"></a>
 +
</html>
 +
</div>
 +
 
 +
 
 +
<div>
 +
= Information processing Model =
 +
[[File:Biobit.jpg|250px|right|thumb|'''Figure 7''': The BioBit, how much information can you process?]]
 +
Signaling pathways and genetic circuitry have the capacity to transmit and process information about certain states in the environment.
 +
They are used by the cell to make decisions about whether to take certain actions to remain well adapted. Until now we have used models to describe these dynamics with the goal of eventually having enough insight into the systems so we can actually engineer them.
 +
 
 +
If we however want to quantify the information processing capacity we will need something extra. Something like the BioBit!
 +
</div>
 +
 
 +
<div>
 +
<html>
 +
<a href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:TU-Delft/informationtheory" align="right">More Details&nbsp;&nbsp;<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2010/3/36/Right_arrow.png" width="60" height="60"></a>
</html>
</html>
 +
</div>

Latest revision as of 03:42, 27 October 2012

Team:TUDelft/CSSLaksh Menu

Human Outreach

Contents


Overview

We decided to use the modeling expertise of the team members to achieve three key objectives for our project.

  • Develop scientific understanding of the yeast pheromone response pathway.
  • Test the effects of the changes to the system.
  • Aid decision making in the laboratory.

To achieve the stated objectives, we adopted a hierarchical modeling approach, in which we constructed heterogeneous models spanning

  • population dynamics (diffusion model).
  • extra-cellular interactions (structural model).
  • intra-cellular dynamics (pathway model).

Connected Multi-level Models

Figure 1: Scheme of Multi-level models.

These three models interact with each other to represent the mechanism of our project in different perspectives. At the system level, diffusion model sheds light on the behaviour of the proposed device the Snifferometer, incorporating the observations obtained from the single cell pathway model. At a lower level, the pathway model is built to functionally simulate the intra-cellular biochemical reactions in the signalling pathway. Parameters in pathway were fitted to the experimental data so as to provide a good estimate of the concentration of the Green Fluoroscent Protein. At a still lower level, the structural model was designed to understand the ligand docking at the molecular level. It indicates how well the ligand-receptor interaction is due to hydrogen bonds, which gives an insight into the receptor activation rate in the pathway model. Further research on the ligand-receptor model may provide more knowledge about ligand affinity and G-protein release.

Based on these models, a practical device, Snifferometer is designed to achieve the purpose of odor detection. The model of this device is developed to give an idea of the application of our project.

The models that were built spanned a broad spectrum of techniques: PDE, MD (Molecular Dynamics), SDE and ODE, as well as alignment techniques, with diverse tools being employed for the application of these techniques: COMSOL, YASARA, MATLAB, COPASI, BLAST, ClustalO, Ensembl, PSIPRED.

Research Cycle

This research cycle is introduced in our project as an interactive boundary between the wetlab and the "dry" modeling to gain a hierarchical in-depth understanding of our biological system. [1]

Figure 2: Model-Experiment Cycle.

Four basic phases are sequenced to close the cycle, as shows in Figure 2.

First, model hypotheses for the signal transduction and the ligand-binding structure are proposed based on the biological expertise, the literature surveys on the related databases.

Second, due to the inadequate descriptions of dynamics and lack of information, more analysis of the hypothesized models were done to investigate the properties of models such as the parameter sensitivities and the structural stability in pathway model.

Third, The experimental design was aided by the initial analysis of the models. A 2D spatio-temporal model of the proposed device was also implemented to aid the conceptualization of the Snifferometer.

Finally, the measured data from "wet" experiment, in turn, modified the final set of parameters to provide a more accurate description of the pathway.

As a result of the research cycle, a model validated by data was obtained which was used to predict the outcomes of the experiments, using which different conditions could be simulated by "cheap" computations in silco instead of the time-consuming experiments.


Structural Model

In order to engineer a yeast strain that is able to detect a tuberculosis molecule (TB), its receptor should be designed
Figure 3: Niacin receptor embedded in membrane.
in such a way that the molecule can act as an agonist. By modeling the olfactory receptor in silico by means of Molecular Dynamics simulations (MD), its biophysical and biochemical properties are investigated at the molecular level. The aim is to get a clear understanding of how a ligand binds in the receptor and how to mutate the binding niche to let it bind to methyl nicotinate more specifically. A strong correlation between in vivo activity of the Homo Sapiens niacin receptor 1 and the simulated activity from the model resulted, enabling the prediction of ligand characteristics in the binding niche.

More Details  


Pathway Model

The bio-chemical pathway model was developed based on a scheme favouring the temporal order of the processes, which involved the four fundamental modules,
Figure 4: Schematic representation of the pathway model.
  • Receptor Activation
  • G - Protein Cycle
  • MAPK Cascade
  • Gene Expression

Three different models were used for the analysis of different aspects of the pathway. The dynamics of the system in these models were described using a set of differential equations governing the concentration changes of individual components and of complexes over time.

Sensitivity and stability analysis were permformed to determine the sensitivity coefficients which were used to study the parametric dependence of the biological models. The results from the sensitivity analysis were then used in the parameter estimation to fit the model to the data provided by the experimentalists.

More Details  

Diffusion Model

Figure 5: The convection based model of the Snifferometer

One of the main objectives of the project was to synthesize a practical device for the detector This led to the design of a three layered device, The Snifferometer.

As a first step towards achieving this goal, we built a temporal model of the system using PDE's which were simulated in matlab. A 2D reaction-diffusion system was then implemented in COMSOL multiphysics using the knowledge obtained from single cell pathway model, combining the behaviours of the which helped us get a better understanding of how such a device could be implemented and the response times involved in such a process.

More Details  

Stochastic Model - Sensitivity & Specificity Analysis

Figure 6: The convection based model of the Snifferometer

A false positive and false negative analysis is a crucial aspect of a binary classification test such as the snifferomenter, as it indicates the confidence level in the data that one should typically strive for. On account of the inherent stochasticity in biological functions, we built a stochastic model to analyze the Sensitivity and the Specificity of the Snifferometer.

More Details  


Information processing Model

Figure 7: The BioBit, how much information can you process?

Signaling pathways and genetic circuitry have the capacity to transmit and process information about certain states in the environment. They are used by the cell to make decisions about whether to take certain actions to remain well adapted. Until now we have used models to describe these dynamics with the goal of eventually having enough insight into the systems so we can actually engineer them.

If we however want to quantify the information processing capacity we will need something extra. Something like the BioBit!

More Details