Team:Penn State/Judging Criteria

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(3 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 52: Line 52:
text-align: center;
text-align: center;
}
}
-
h3 {font-size:1.4em; font-weight:400; margin:0 0 10px;}
+
h3 {font-size:1.4em;
 +
        font-weight:400;
 +
        margin:0 0 10px;
 +
}
p {
p {
line-height: 1.5em;
line-height: 1.5em;
Line 91: Line 94:
color: #FFF;
color: #FFF;
}
}
-
#desc h2 {
+
#desc h3 {
color: #fff;
color: #fff;
padding: 15px 15px 0;
padding: 15px 15px 0;
text-align: left;
text-align: left;
text-size: 18pt;
text-size: 18pt;
-
font-size: 16pt;
+
        font-size: 16pt;
}
}
#desc a {border-color:#fff; color:#fff; text-decoration:none;}
#desc a {border-color:#fff; color:#fff; text-decoration:none;}
Line 188: Line 191:
<a class="navitab" href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Penn_State/Project">Projects</a><span class="hide"> | </span>
<a class="navitab" href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Penn_State/Project">Projects</a><span class="hide"> | </span>
<a class="navitab" href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Penn_State/Parts">Parts</a><span class="hide"> | </span>
<a class="navitab" href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Penn_State/Parts">Parts</a><span class="hide"> | </span>
-
<a class="navitab" href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Penn_State/Modeling">Modeling</a><span class="hide"> | </span>
+
<a class="navitab" href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Penn_State/Modeling">Main Results</a><span class="hide"> | </span>
<a class="navitab" href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Penn_State/Notebook">Notebook</a><span class="hide"> | </span>
<a class="navitab" href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Penn_State/Notebook">Notebook</a><span class="hide"> | </span>
<a class="activenavitab" href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Penn_State/Other">Other</a>
<a class="activenavitab" href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Penn_State/Other">Other</a>
Line 194: Line 197:
<div id="desc">
<div id="desc">
-
<h2>Questioning Central Dogma</h2>
+
<h3>Questioning Central Dogma</h3></br>
-
<p>The Central Dogma of Molecular Biology is the foundation of modern-day synthetic, molecular, and microbiology. While countless innovations in medicine and technology are based on the truth of the doctrine, it does not always accurately predict results in the lab. The Penn State iGEM team questions the central dogma with genetic constructs explore deviations from the norm.</p>
+
<p>Check out the progress we've made in the iGEM competition by reviewing the judging criteria we have met so far. The iGEM East Americas Jamboree awarded us a gold medal, but here is the proof how much we have achieved.</p>
<p class="right"><a href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Penn_State/Project">Projects >></a></p>
<p class="right"><a href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Penn_State/Project">Projects >></a></p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="main">
<div id="main">
-
<h1>Judging Criteria</h1>
+
<h2>Judging Criteria</h2>
<br/>
<br/>
<h2>Bronze Medal</h2>
<h2>Bronze Medal</h2>
Line 209: Line 212:
  <dd><i>Complete</i></dd>
  <dd><i>Complete</i></dd>
  <dt>Complete a Poster and Talk at the Jamboree</dt>
  <dt>Complete a Poster and Talk at the Jamboree</dt>
-
  <dd><i>Pending</i></dd>
+
  <dd><i>Complete</i></dd>
  <dt>Submit a new BioBrick Part</dt>
  <dt>Submit a new BioBrick Part</dt>
  <dd><i>Complete</i></dd>
  <dd><i>Complete</i></dd>
Line 216: Line 219:
<dl>
<dl>
  <dt>Demonstrate that a new BioBrick of the team's design worked as expected</dt>
  <dt>Demonstrate that a new BioBrick of the team's design worked as expected</dt>
-
  <dd><i>Pending</i></dd>
+
  <dd><i>Complete</i></dd>
  <dt>Characterize the operation of a new BioBrick of the team's design and enter this information</dt>
  <dt>Characterize the operation of a new BioBrick of the team's design and enter this information</dt>
-
  <dd><i>Pending</i></dd>
+
  <dd><i>Complete</i></dd>
</dl>
</dl>
<h2>Gold Medal</h2>
<h2>Gold Medal</h2>
Line 227: Line 230:
  <dd><i>Incomplete</i></dd>
  <dd><i>Incomplete</i></dd>
  <dt>Outline and detail a new approach to Human Practices in Synthetic Biology as it relates to the team's project</dt>
  <dt>Outline and detail a new approach to Human Practices in Synthetic Biology as it relates to the team's project</dt>
-
  <dd><i>Pending</i></dd>
+
  <dd><i>Complete</i></dd>
</dl>
</dl>

Latest revision as of 03:03, 27 October 2012

Index

Questioning Central Dogma


Check out the progress we've made in the iGEM competition by reviewing the judging criteria we have met so far. The iGEM East Americas Jamboree awarded us a gold medal, but here is the proof how much we have achieved.

Projects >>

Judging Criteria


Bronze Medal

Team Registration
Complete
Team Wiki
Complete
Complete a Poster and Talk at the Jamboree
Complete
Submit a new BioBrick Part
Complete

Silver Medal

Demonstrate that a new BioBrick of the team's design worked as expected
Complete
Characterize the operation of a new BioBrick of the team's design and enter this information
Complete

Gold Medal

Improve the function of an existing BioBrick and post the information to the registry
Pending
Help another iGEM team
Incomplete
Outline and detail a new approach to Human Practices in Synthetic Biology as it relates to the team's project
Complete