Team:Paris Bettencourt

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 62: Line 62:
<li class="last"><span class="date" style="background:rgb(121,173,89);">9/7/12</span> <a href="/Safety">Safety questions due </a></li>
<li class="last"><span class="date" style="background:rgb(121,173,89);">9/7/12</span> <a href="/Safety">Safety questions due </a></li>
<li class="last"><span class="date">9/26/12</span>Project and part documentation due, including documentation for all medal criteria </li>
<li class="last"><span class="date">9/26/12</span>Project and part documentation due, including documentation for all medal criteria </li>
-
<li class="last"><span class="date">9/26/12</span>BioBrick Part DNA due to the Registry </li>
+
<li class="last"><span class="date" style="background:rgb(121,173,89);">9/26/12</span>BioBrick Part DNA due to the Registry </li>
<li class="last"><span class="date">9/26/12</span> <a href="https://igem.org/2012_Judging_Form?id=914">Judging form due </a></li>
<li class="last"><span class="date">9/26/12</span> <a href="https://igem.org/2012_Judging_Form?id=914">Judging form due </a></li>

Revision as of 17:03, 21 September 2012


iGEM Paris Bettencourt 2012

Abstract

During previous years’ competitions, many iGEM teams have developed projects that propose the application of Genetically Engineered Organisms (GEO) in natural environments. However, issues of biosafety continue to complicate and constrain the use of GEOs outside the lab. A primary concern is the Horizontal Gene Transfer (HGT) of synthetic genes to natural populations. Various strategies have been developed to address this problem, providing varying levels of containment. However, the substantial elimination of HGT risks remains difficult or perhaps impossible.

Our project aims to :

  • Raise the issue of biosafety, and advocate the discerning use of biosafety circuits in future iGEM projects as a requirement
  • Evaluate the risk of HGT in different SynBio applications
  • Develop a new, improved containment system to expand the range of environments where GEOs can be used safely.

To do so, we will :
  • Engage the general public and scientific community through debate
  • Raise the question about how can we regulate this practices ?
  • Compile a parts page of safety circuits in the registry
  • Rely on three levels of containment :
    • Physical containment with alginate capsules
    • Semantic containment using an amber suppressor system
    • An improved killswitch featuring delayed population-level suicide through complete genome degradation.
  • We will strive to make our system as robust against mutations as possible.




Copyright (c) 2012 igem.org. All rights reserved. Design by FCT.