Team:NTU-Taida/Project/PEPDEX

From 2012.igem.org

Revision as of 14:06, 26 October 2012 by Angela (Talk | contribs)

Introduction

Introduction

Introduction

We seek to bridge the fields of synthetic biology and pharmacology to provide a revolutionary way of drug delivery called PEPDEX, the ultimate delivery system of peptides. Peptides bind to specific receptors and regulate many physiological processes. For instance, peptide-based hormones, such as insulin, growth hormone, and ACTH, are secreted by the pituitary gland and coordinate many physiological functions, including energy metabolism and stress response. Peptides have long been widely used in pharmacology to treat certain diseases, and with a better understanding of diseases, peptide-based drugs can now be applied in many disease modalities (except for hormonal supply), such as neurology, and immunology. Structurally, peptide-based drugs have many benefits. First, they can be processed and modified to bind seamlessly to specific receptors with complex 3D structures, which may not be accessible to small molecule drugs. Second, when applied in immunology, synthetic peptides can be used to mimic epitopes presented to antigen-presenting cells. Modified synthetic peptides show great efficacy in the induction of cognate CD4 T-cells, which is required for therapeutic activity against infection diseases, and, in particular, cancer.

Structure of PEPDEX

Reference

  1. Collins SM, et al. (2012) The interplay between the intestinal microbiota and the brain. Nature Reviews Microbiology. AOP, published online 24 September 2012, 1-8.
  2. Cryan JF, et al. (2012) Mind-altering microorganisms: the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour. NatureReviews Neuroscience 13: 701-712.
  3. Rhee SH, et al. (2009) Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis. Nature Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 6, 306–314.
  4. Neufeld KM, et al. (2010) Reduced anxiety-like behavior and central neurochemical change in germ-free mice. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 23, 255–264.
  5. Bercik, P. et al. (2011) The intestinal microbiota affect central levels of brain-derived neurotropic factor and behavior in mice. Gastroenterology 141, 599–609.
  6. Lyte M, et al. (2006) Induction of anxiety-like behavior in mice during the initial stages of infection with the agent of murine colonic hyperplasia Citrobacter rodentium. Physiol. Behav. 89, 350–357.
  7. Bravo, J. A. et al. (2011) Ingestion of Lactobacillus strain regulates emotional behavior and central GABA receptor expression in a mouse via the vagus nerve. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 16050–16055.
  8. Wall, R. et al. (2012)Contrasting effects of Bifidobacterium breve NCIMB 702258 and Bifidobacterium breve DPC 6330 on the composition of murine brain fatty acids and gut microbiota. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 95, 1278–1287.
  9. Tillisch, K. et al. (2012) Modulation of the brain–gut axis after 4 week intervention with a probiotic fermented dairy product. Gastroenterology 142, S-115.
  10. Mayer EA. (2011) Gut feelings: the emerging biology of gut–brain communication. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 12, 453–466.
  11. Freestone PP, et al. (2008) Microbial endocrinology: how stress influences susceptibility to infection. Trends Microbiol. 16, 55–64.
  12. Kaper JB, et al. (2005). Bacterial cell to cell signaling in the gastrointestinal tract. Infect. Immun. 73, 3197–3209.
  13. Neufeld KM, et al. (2011). Reduced anxiety-like behavior and central neurochemical change in germ-free mice. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 23, 255–264.
  14. Heijtz RD, et al. (2011) Normal gut microbiota modulates brain development and behavior. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 3047–3052.
  15. Gareau MG, et al. (2011) Bacterial infection causes stress-induced memory dysfunction in mice. Gut 60, 307–317.
  16. Desbonnet L, et al. (2010) Effects of the probiotic Bifidobacterium infantis in the maternal separation model of depression. Neuroscience 170, 1179–1188.
  17. Lyte M. (2011) Probiotics function mechanistically as delivery vehicles for neuroactive compounds: microbial endocrinology in the design and use of probiotics. Bioessays 33, 574–581.
  18. Derecki, N. C. et al. (2010) Regulation of learning and memory by meningeal immunity: a key role for IL 4. J. Exp. Med. 207, 1067–1080.
  19. Lyte M, et al. (2011) Stress at the intestinal surface: catecholamines and mucosa– bacteria interactions. Cell Tissue Res. 2431, 23–32..
  20. Lee Y K, et al. (2011) Proinflammatory T cell responses to gut microbiota promote experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4615–4622.
  21. Berer, K. et al. (2011) Commensal microbiota and myelin autoantigen cooperate to trigger autoimmune demyelination. Nature 479, 538–541.
  22. Juárez I, et al. (2008) Ontogeny of altered dendritic morphology in the rat prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, and nucleus accumbens following cesarean delivery and birth anoxia. J. Comp. Neurol. 507, 1734–1747.