Team:Grenoble/Modeling/Notebook/August/34

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Blanked the page)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
-
{{:Team:Grenoble/Templates/Modeling}}
 
-
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
 
-
<body id="Modeling">
 
-
<div id="cadre">
 
-
<section>
 
-
<h1>August</h1>
 
-
<a href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Grenoble/Modeling/Notebook/August/31">Week 31</a> •
 
-
<a href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Grenoble/Modeling/Notebook/August/32">Week 32</a> •
 
-
<a href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Grenoble/Modeling/Notebook/August/33">Week 33</a> •
 
-
<a href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Grenoble/Modeling/Notebook/August/34">Week 34</a> •
 
-
<a href="http://2012.igem.org/Team:Grenoble/Modeling/Notebook/August/35">Week 35</a>
 
-
</section>
 
-
 
-
<br/>
 
-
 
-
<section>
 
-
<h1> Week 34: August 20<span class="exposant">th</span> to 26<span class="exposant">th</span> </h1>
 
-
</br>
 
-
<b> Goal </b>
 
-
</br>
 
-
<ul>
 
-
<li>End of the stochastic</li>
 
-
<li>Redaction of the stochastic part</li>
 
-
<li>Equilibrium analysis</li>
 
-
<li>Determine which parameters we should modify to get better results</li>
 
-
</ul>
 
-
</br>
 
-
<b> Completion </b>
 
-
</br>
 
-
For the stochastic part we are still waiting on parameters. Concerning the redaction of the stochastic part, we can't progress seeing that we can't analyse our results yet.
 
-
</br>
 
-
It seems that we reach the wanted equilibriums only if the basal production of Ca is zero. We modified the ODE to make them be always right.
 
-
</section>
 
-
</div>
 
-
</body>
 
-
</html>
 
-
{{:Team:Grenoble/script}}
 
-
{{:Team:Grenoble/menu}}
 

Latest revision as of 00:13, 25 September 2012