Team:Carnegie Mellon/Bio-Submitted

(Difference between revisions)
 Revision as of 21:07, 1 October 2012 (view source)Leocmt (Talk | contribs)← Older edit Revision as of 21:10, 1 October 2012 (view source)Leocmt (Talk | contribs) Newer edit → Line 149: Line 149: RBS used in construct is: CATATG AAGAAGGAGA TATACC RBS used in construct is: CATATG AAGAAGGAGA TATACC + + Using the model we developed in MATLAB, we calculated the following properties with respect to the wild-type promoter. + + + +
Promoter Mutant I Mutant II Mutant III
Transcription Strength 97% 72% 127%
Translational Efficiency 6% 6% 94%
RNA degradation constant (assumed) 100% 100% 100%
Protein degradation constant (fit) 4% 6% 60%
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + {{:Team:Carnegie_Mellon/Templates/Footer}} {{:Team:Carnegie_Mellon/Templates/Footer}}

Submitted Parts

We have submitted three T7Lac promoter parts to the registry. The followings show the sequences of these constructs. BBa_K613007: TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGAGGAATTGTGAGCGGATAACAA
Mutant I: TAATGCGACTCACTATAGGACAATTGTGGGCGGACAACAATTCCAA
Mutant II: TAATACGACTCACTACAGGGCGGAATTGTGAGCGGATAACAATTCCAA
Mutant III: CAATCCGACTCACTAAAGAGAGAATTGTGAGCGGATAACAATTCCAA

Predicted strength of the hybrid T7Lac promoters

Expected promoter strength of the mutants (relative to BBa_K613007):
Mutant I: <100%
Mutant II: ~100%
Mutant III: ~50%

Expected LacI leaky expression of different mutants:
Mutant I: More than average
Mutant II: Average
Mutant III: Average

RBS used in construct is: CATATG AAGAAGGAGA TATACC Using the model we developed in MATLAB, we calculated the following properties with respect to the wild-type promoter.
Promoter Transcription Strength Translational Efficiency Mutant I Mutant II Mutant III 97% 72% 127% 6% 6% 94% 100% 100% 100% 4% 6% 60%