Team:Buenos Aires/Project/Schemes
From 2012.igem.org
(Difference between revisions)
Manugimenez (Talk | contribs) (→Stochastic State Transitions) |
(→Stochastic State Transitions) |
||
Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
* All components need to be incorporated in the same strain, thus no circuit integration or isolation is possible (see applications section). | * All components need to be incorporated in the same strain, thus no circuit integration or isolation is possible (see applications section). | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | |||
+ | == References == | ||
+ | |||
+ | # You L., Sidney Cox III R., Weiss R., Arnold1 F. H. (2004). Programmed population control by cell–cell communication and regulated killing. Nature 428, 868-871. | ||
+ | # Derossi D., Chassaing G., Prochiantz A.. (1998). Trojan peptides: the penetratin system for intracellular delivery. Trends Cell Biol 8-2. 84-87. | ||
+ | # Shou W., Ram S., Vilar J. M. G. (2006). Synthetic cooperation in engineered yeast populations. PNAS 104-6 1877-1882 |
Revision as of 18:36, 18 September 2012
Contents |
Schemes
Crossfeeding
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
|
|
Independent Population Control
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
|
|
Cross-population control
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
|
|
Stochastic State Transitions
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
|
|
References
- You L., Sidney Cox III R., Weiss R., Arnold1 F. H. (2004). Programmed population control by cell–cell communication and regulated killing. Nature 428, 868-871.
- Derossi D., Chassaing G., Prochiantz A.. (1998). Trojan peptides: the penetratin system for intracellular delivery. Trends Cell Biol 8-2. 84-87.
- Shou W., Ram S., Vilar J. M. G. (2006). Synthetic cooperation in engineered yeast populations. PNAS 104-6 1877-1882