Revision as of 22:22, 26 September 2012 by Juvoss (Talk | contribs)


Our BioBricks


coming soon read more

Judging criteria

Bronze criteria

Bielefeld2012 haken grau.jpg
Registration of our team

Bielefeld2012 haken grau.jpg
Judging form completed

Bielefeld2012 haken grau.jpg
Team Wiki constructed

Presentation of a poster and a talk at the iGEM Jamboree

Bielefeld2012 haken grau.jpg
Either one new submitted and highly-documented standard BioBrick Part or Device, or a new application of and outstanding documentation of an already existing BioBrick part in the “Experience” section of that BioBrick’s Registry entry.

Silver criteria

In addition to the Bronze criteria...

  • Demonstrate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expected
  • Characterization of the operation of at least one new BioBrick Part/ Device and enter this information in the “Main Page” section of that Part’s/Device’s Registry entry.

Gold criteria

One or more of the following aspects in addition to the Bronze & Silver criteria...

  • Improve the function of an existing BioBrick Part or Device (created by another team or your own institution in a previous year) and enter this information in the Registry (in the “Experience” section of that BioBrick’s Registry entry), and don't forget to create a new registry page for the improved part.
  • Help another iGEM team by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system.
  • Outline and detail a new approach to an issue of Human Practice in synthetic biology as it relates to your project, such as safety, security, ethics, or ownership, sharing, and innovation.

Collaboration with the TU Munich and the UCL London

This team completed TU Munich's survey on Standardization of BioBrick part descriptions

Collaboration with the iGEM Team from University College London

We started collaboration with the iGEM Team University College London. They also work with a laccase, the laccase from E. coli W3110. So we had good requirements to characterize each other’s laccases with the different methods we used to characterize the proteins. Therefore we sent our part BBa_K863000 and got the part BBa_K729006. In our experiments we showed that their laccase is expressed and active in our Activity measurement.
For more detailed information about the methods we used for characterization and the results have a look on the Result Page or the entry in Parts Registry.

Collaboration with the iGEM team from the Southern University of Denmark

We invited the iGEM Team from the Southern University of Denmark to Bielefeld to share and exchange knowledge and of course to meet another iGEM team. Furthermore they supported us on our event Street Science. Here you can find all information about our meeting.

Promega logo 180x109.gif Logo merck.jpg BioCircle.JPG Bielefeld2012 Evonik.jpg Bielefeld2012 Baxter.png Logo knauer.jpg Logo iit.jpg Bielefeld2012 BIEKUBA.jpg Logo biometra.jpg Logo bio-nrw.png Bielefeld2012 Logo ERASynbio.jpg