Team:UT Dallas/partsregistry

From 2012.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
 
(One intermediate revision not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
<link href="https://2012.igem.org/Team:UT_Dallas/test/page.css?action=raw&ctype=text/css&purtryjryjytu=eryw" rel="stylesheet">
+
<div id='st_1'><font color = '#9eb123' size='3px'>Project: Registry</font><br>
-
 
+
-
<div id='middle_box'>
+
-
<div id='st_1'><font color = '#9eb123' size='3px'>Project: Registry</h2></font><br>
+
Anyone and everyone who has ever participated in iGEM would agree that the Registry of Parts is not the most user-friendly program to use. Our team decided it is imperative for the Registry to be redone in a more user-friendly fashion. Therefore, this year we proposed a layout for a "Registry 2.0".
Anyone and everyone who has ever participated in iGEM would agree that the Registry of Parts is not the most user-friendly program to use. Our team decided it is imperative for the Registry to be redone in a more user-friendly fashion. Therefore, this year we proposed a layout for a "Registry 2.0".
-
</div>
 
</div>
</div>

Latest revision as of 23:31, 23 September 2012

Project: Registry

Anyone and everyone who has ever participated in iGEM would agree that the Registry of Parts is not the most user-friendly program to use. Our team decided it is imperative for the Registry to be redone in a more user-friendly fashion. Therefore, this year we proposed a layout for a "Registry 2.0".